Open report — full analysis, no account required.
Sign up to generate reports and read filings that aren't on the open list.
Get notified when V files again. Create a free account and we'll email you the moment its next filing is analyzed.
Get filing alertsrevenue $11.6B, net income $5.63B. Visa litigation accrual falls; revenue
Filed July 29, 2026 · Period ending June 30, 2026 · Compared to 10-Q Jul 30, 2025 · ~2 min read
Key Financials
SEC XBRL| Metric | PriorJun 30, 2025 | CurrentJun 30, 2026 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $10.2B | $11.6B | ▲ +14.4% |
| Net income | $5.27B | $5.63B | ▲ +6.8% |
| Operating income | $6.18B | $6.88B | ▲ +11.3% |
| Cash & equivalents | $17.1B | $12.4B | ▼ -27.7% |
| Long-term debt (noncurrent) | $19.6B | $20.9B | ▲ +6.5% |
| Total assets | $100.0B | $94.6B | ▼ -5.4% |
As reported in XBRL by the filer · 10-Q vs 10-Q. Income figures cover the fiscal quarter (not year-to-date); cash & assets are period-end balances. n/m = not meaningful (sign change; a % would mislead). about this table · verify on EDGAR →
Key Number Changes
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR →
Balance as of end of period $ 2,352 $ 1,688
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Balance as of end of period $ 1,274 $ 2,352
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR →
Balance as of end of period $ 2,255 $ 1,557
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Balance as of end of period $ 822 $ 2,255
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR →
For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2025, net revenue increased 14% and 11% over the prior-year comparable periods, respectively
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2026, net revenue increased 14% and 15%, respectively, over the prior-year comparable periods
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR →
Service revenue increased over the three and nine-month prior-year comparable periods primarily due to growth in nominal payments volume of 5% and 6%, respectively
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2026, nominal payments volume growth of
11% and 10% was supported by broad-based growth across both credit and debit spending
Prior filing · view on EDGAR →
Visa processed transactions 65,443 59,318 10 % 189,891 172,247 10 %
Current filing · view on EDGAR →
Visa processed transactions 71,662 65,443 10 % 207,148 189,891 9 %
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR →
For the three months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, revenue from value-added services was $2.8 billion and $2.2 billion, respectively. For the nine months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, revenue from value-added services was $7.8 billion and $6.4 billion, respectively. Value-added services revenue increased 28% and 22% over the three and nine-month prior-year comparable periods, respectively
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
For the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, revenue from value-added services was $3.8 billion and $2.8 billion, respectively. For the nine months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, revenue from value-added services was $10.3 billion and $7.8 billion, respectively. Value-added services revenue increased 33% and 32% over the three and nine-month prior-year comparable periods, respectively
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR →
For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2025, operating expenses increased 35% and 26% over the prior-year comparable periods, respectively, primarily driven by higher litigation provision and personnel expenses.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2026, operating expenses increased 19% and 13%, respectively, over the prior-year comparable periods, primarily driven by higher personnel expenses. The increase over the nine-month prior-year comparable period was also driven by higher marketing expenses.
Prior filing · view on EDGAR →
Litigation provision 615 13 NM 1,659 452 NM
Current filing · view on EDGAR →
Litigation provision 253 615 (59 %) 1,290 1,659 (22 %)
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR →
For the nine months ended June 30, 2025, we repurchased 40 million shares of our class A common stock in the open market for $13.2 billion. As of June 30, 2025, our share repurchase program had remaining authorized funds of $29.8 billion.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
For the nine months ended June 30, 2026, we repurchased 50 million shares of our class A common stock in the open market for $16.5 billion. As of June 30, 2026, our share repurchase programs had remaining authorized funds of $28.4 billion.
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR →
On July 29, 2025, our board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.59 per share of class A common stock
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
On July 28, 2026, our board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.67 per share of class A common stock
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR →
For the nine months ended June 30, 2025, the Company recorded additional accruals of $1.5 billion and deposited $375 million into the U.S. litigation escrow account to address claims associated with the interchange multidistrict litigation.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
For the nine months ended June 30, 2026, the Company recorded additional accruals of $1.1 billion and deposited $875 million into the U.S. litigation escrow account to address claims associated with the interchange multidistrict litigation.
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR →
Balance as of end of period $ 6
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Balance as of end of period $ 89
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR →
As of June 30, 2025 and September 30, 2024, the book value of series A convertible participating preferred stock (series A preferred stock) was $388 million and $540 million, respectively.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
As of June 30, 2026 and September 30, 2025, the book value of series A convertible participating preferred stock (series A preferred stock) was $402 million and $513 million, respectively.
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR → · paraphrased
For the nine months ended June 30, 2025, shares repurchased in the open market: 40 million shares, average repurchase cost per share: $330.39, total cost: $13,241 million.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR → · paraphrased
For the nine months ended June 30, 2026, shares repurchased in the open market: 50 million shares, average repurchase cost per share: $328.29, total cost: $16,537 million.
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR →
On July 29, 2025, the Company’s board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.59 per share of class A common stock (determined in the case of all other outstanding common and preferred stock on an as-converted basis), payable on September 2, 2025 to all holders of record as of August 12, 2025.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
On July 28, 2026, the Company’s board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.67 per share of class A common stock (determined in the case of all other outstanding common and preferred stock on an as-converted basis), payable on September 1, 2026 to all holders of record as of August 11, 2026.
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR →
For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2025, the effective income tax rate was 17%
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2026, the effective income tax rates were 18% and 16%, respectively.
Key Changes
-
high
Total litigation accrual decreased (from ) as Visa paid out in settlements during the nine months, primarily for interchange MDL opt-out merchants now covering 95% of affected volume.
-
high
Net revenue growth accelerated from prior year, driven by nominal payments volume growth doubling to 10-11% and cross-border volume up 14-15%. Value-added services revenue rose, up from 22-28%.
-
high
Interchange MDL Injunctive Relief Class settlement received preliminary approval June 9, 2026; final approval motion filed July 15. Securities class action dismissed without leave to amend June 29, 2026.
-
high
New European merchant groups filed interchange claims in UK High Court (April-June 2026) seeking damages from 2019 forward; Potayto-Potahto filed new U.S. class action April 21 challenging validity of prior MDL settlement releases.
-
medium
Severance costs of recorded in the quarter (vs. nine-month total prior year) for actions to drive operational efficiencies and reinvest in high-growth opportunities. Operating expense growth decelerated to 13-19% from 26-35%.
Summary
Visa's third quarter fiscal 2026 shows the company making substantial progress resolving its long-running interchange litigation while accelerating core business growth. The litigation accrual fell 46% to $1.3 billion as Visa paid out $3.1 billion in settlements during the nine-month period, primarily to opt-out merchants now representing 95% of affected Visa-branded payment card sales volume.
The Injunctive Relief Class settlement advanced to preliminary approval in June 2026, with a final approval motion filed in July. The securities class action tied to the DOJ antitrust case was dismissed without leave to amend, and two other cases (Debit Surcharge, MiCamp Solutions) were also dismissed favorably.
However, new litigation fronts emerged: multiple European merchant groups filed interchange claims in the UK High Court between April and June 2026 seeking damages from 2019 forward, and Potayto-Potahto filed a new U.S. class action in April attempting to circumvent or invalidate the forward-looking release in the prior Damages Class settlement. The UK Competition Appeal Tribunal issued a mixed decision in February 2026, finding interchange was not passed by most merchants (favorable to Visa on damages) while Visa appeals the June 2025 ruling that certain rates restrict competition. On the business side, revenue growth accelerated sharply: net revenue rose 15% for the nine months (up from 11% prior year) as nominal payments volume growth doubled to 10-11% and value-added services revenue jumped 32-33%. The company recorded $563 million in severance costs during the quarter as part of a restructuring to drive operational efficiencies, more than double the $213 million recorded in the entire prior nine-month period. Visa also completed a $1.5 billion acquisition of Prisma and Newpay in Argentina in February 2026, expanding its Latin American processing footprint. Watch next quarter for final approval of the Injunctive Relief Class settlement and developments in the new European and Potayto-Potahto litigation.
Section-by-Section Diff
Legal Proceedings
Litigation accruals fell 46% to $1.3B; interchange MDL settlement advanced; new European interchange claims filed; securities class action dismissed.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Balance as of end of period $ 2,352 $ 1,688
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Balance as of end of period $ 1,274 $ 2,352
Total litigation accrual decreased from $2,352 million at June 30, 2025 to $1,274 million at June 30, 2026, a 46% decline. This reflects $3.1 billion in payments during the nine months ended June 30, 2026 (versus $1.1 billion in the prior-year period), partially offset by $1.4 billion in new provisions. The decline indicates substantial settlement activity, primarily in the interchange MDL.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Balance as of end of period $ 2,255 $ 1,557
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Balance as of end of period $ 822 $ 2,255
U.S. covered litigation accrual fell from $2,255 million at June 30, 2025 to $822 million at June 30, 2026, a 64% decrease. The company recorded $1.1 billion in new provisions for interchange MDL (versus $1.5 billion prior year) but paid out $3.0 billion (versus $827 million prior year). The company also deposited $875 million into escrow during the nine months ended June 30, 2026 (versus $375 million prior year).
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
On November 10, 2025, Visa and Mastercard entered into a superseding and amended settlement agreement to resolve the Injunctive Relief Class claims and the Injunctive Relief Class plaintiffs filed a motion for preliminary approval of the settlement, which was granted on June 9, 2026. On July 15, 2026, the Injunctive Relief Class plaintiffs filed a motion for final approval of the settlement.
Visa entered a new settlement agreement for the Injunctive Relief Class on November 10, 2025, received preliminary approval on June 9, 2026, and a motion for final approval was filed July 15, 2026. This represents significant progress toward resolving a major component of the interchange MDL. The baseline filing did not disclose this settlement.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Visa has reached settlements with a number of merchants representing approximately 82% of the Visa-branded payment card sales volume of merchants who opted out of the Amended Settlement Agreement with the Damages Class plaintiffs.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Visa has reached settlements with a number of merchants representing approximately 95% of the Visa-branded payment card sales volume of merchants who opted out of the Amended Settlement Agreement with the Damages Class plaintiffs. As a result of settlements reached during the three months ended March 31, 2026, all actions that were scheduled for trial beginning in April 2026 in the Southern District of New York have been resolved.
Visa increased its settlement coverage of opt-out merchants from 82% to 95% of Visa-branded payment card sales volume. All actions scheduled for trial beginning April 2026 have been resolved. This substantially reduces trial risk and explains the large payments and accrual drawdown during the period.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
On April 21, 2026, Potayto-Potahto, LLC and two other merchants filed a class action complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Visa Inc., Visa U.S.A., Visa International, Mastercard Incorporated, and Mastercard International Incorporated, asserting violations of federal antitrust laws consistent with allegations made in MDL 1720. The complaint is brought on behalf of merchants that have accepted Visa and/or Mastercard credit cards since January 25, 2019, and seeks damages from that date.
A new class action was filed April 21, 2026 by Potayto-Potahto and two other merchants, asserting antitrust violations consistent with MDL 1720 allegations and seeking damages from January 25, 2019 forward. The same plaintiffs also filed a motion for partial summary judgment in MDL 1720 challenging the validity of the forward-looking release in the Damages Class settlement. This represents a new litigation front attempting to circumvent or invalidate prior settlement releases.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
On April 20, 2026, a group of merchants from across Europe filed a claim in the UK High Court against several Visa entities. The merchants allege that interchange fees on transactions in Europe are an unlawful restriction of competition and seek damages for the period from January 1, 2019 to present.
In May and June 2026, additional merchants asserted claims in the UK High Court against several Visa entities. The merchants allege that interchange fees on transactions in Europe are an unlawful restriction of competition. The plaintiffs’ damages period goes back at least six years from filing.
Multiple new merchant groups filed interchange claims in the UK High Court in April, May, and June 2026, alleging unlawful restriction of competition. The April 2026 claim seeks damages from January 1, 2019 to present; the May/June claims seek damages going back at least six years from filing. This represents a material expansion of European interchange litigation beyond the existing 1,200+ merchant claims disclosed in the baseline.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
As of the filing date, Visa has settled the claims asserted by over 950 Merchants, and there are approximately 150 Merchants with outstanding claims. In addition, over 30 Merchants have threatened to commence similar proceedings. Standstill agreements have been entered into with respect to some of those threatened Merchant claims, several of which have been settled.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
As of the filing date, Visa has settled the claims asserted by over 950
Merchants, and there are over 100 Merchants with outstanding claims. In addition, merchants continue to threaten similar proceedings, and in some cases, the Company has entered into standstill agreements. While the amount of interchange being challenged could be substantial, these claims have not yet been filed and their full scope is not yet known.
Outstanding VE territory merchant claims decreased from approximately 150 to over 100, reflecting continued settlement activity. However, the disclosure now states merchants "continue to threaten similar proceedings" without quantifying the number (baseline said "over 30"), and notes standstill agreements without stating that several have been settled. This suggests ongoing settlement progress but also a less precise view of the threatened-claims pipeline.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
On November 20, 2024, Beibei Cai filed a putative securities class action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against Visa Inc., and certain of our officers on behalf of all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired publicly traded Visa securities between November 16, 2023 and September 23, 2024. The complaint alleges that defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5 in failing to disclose that Visa was in violation of U.S. federal antitrust laws, as was alleged in the lawsuit filed by the U.S. Department of Justice on September 24, 2024 (see U.S. Department of Justice matter). The plaintiff seeks a ruling that this case may proceed as a class action, and seeks damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. On April 23, 2025, the court appointed Cai as lead representative plaintiff. On July 15, 2025 plaintiff filed an amended complaint adding certain current and former officers as defendants and bringing the action on behalf of all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired publicly traded Visa securities between March 2, 2023 and September 23, 2024.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
On December 10, 2025, the court granted Visa’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint with leave to amend, and denied the motion to strike as moot. On January 9, 2026, plaintiff filed a second amended complaint, and Visa filed a motion to dismiss on January 23, 2026, which was granted without leave to amend on June 29, 2026.
The U.S. Securities Class Action was dismissed without leave to amend on June 29, 2026, after the court granted Visa's second motion to dismiss. This represents a favorable resolution of the securities litigation that was filed in November 2024 and amended in July 2025. The case is now effectively terminated.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
On December 4, 2024, James Williams filed a putative class action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against Visa Inc. on behalf of a nationwide class of all persons in the United States who paid a surcharge when completing a purchase with a Visa debit card in a transaction with a merchant located in the United States since 2010. The complaint claims that Visa has failed to enforce its rules prohibiting merchants from surcharging those transactions, and that plaintiff and putative class members have been harmed as a result. Plaintiff asserts breach of contract, unjust enrichment and unfair competition claims, and seeks monetary damages, declaratory and injunctive relief. On February 13, 2025, Visa filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. On May 28, 2025, the district court granted Visa’s motion to dismiss with leave to amend certain claims, and plaintiff subsequently filed an amended complaint asserting substantially the same claims. On July 23, 2025, Visa filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
On December 12, 2025, the court granted Visa’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint without further leave to amend. Plaintiff appealed but subsequently dismissed its appeal.
The Debit Surcharge Class Action was dismissed without further leave to amend on December 12, 2025, and the plaintiff subsequently dismissed its appeal. This represents a favorable resolution of the case that was filed in December 2024 and survived an initial motion to dismiss in May 2025. The case is now effectively terminated.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
On March 24, 2025, the court dismissed with prejudice MiCamp Solutions’ constitutional law claims, dismissed with leave to amend its federal and state antitrust claims and state data privacy law claims, and denied a motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction that MiCamp Solutions filed on March 6, 2025. On April 14, 2025, MiCamp Solutions filed a second amended complaint alleging violations of federal and state antitrust and unfair competition laws based on Visa’s assessment of fees for non-compliance with its surcharge rules. On May 28, 2025, Visa filed a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
On December 11, 2025, the court granted Visa’s motion to dismiss and dismissed plaintiffs’ case without further leave to amend.
The MiCamp Solutions case was dismissed without further leave to amend on December 11, 2025, after the court granted Visa's motion to dismiss the second amended complaint. This represents a favorable resolution of the case that had survived an initial partial dismissal in March 2025. The case is now effectively terminated.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
On December 19, 2024 the UK Court of Appeal issued a decision restricting Merchant damages to six years preceding the claim filing. The six-year limitation period will apply to all existing and future Merchant claims brought under English law in the Courts of England and Wales. In April 2025, a trial was completed before the UK
Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) regarding the extent to which interchange fees were passed on by acquirers and merchants. On June 25, 2025, a judgment was handed down by the CAT determining that certain interchange rates restrict competition under UK antitrust law.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
On February 18, 2026, the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) issued a decision finding that, except in certain merchant categories, interchange was not passed on by merchants, and Visa has sought permission from the UK Court of Appeal to appeal that decision. On March 17, 2026, the UK Court of Appeal granted Visa permission to appeal the June 2025 decision by the CAT that certain interchange rates restrict competition under UK competition law.
The UK CAT issued a February 18, 2026 decision finding that interchange was not passed on by merchants (except in certain categories), and Visa has sought permission to appeal. On March 17, 2026, the UK Court of Appeal granted Visa permission to appeal the June 2025 CAT decision that certain interchange rates restrict competition. These developments represent mixed outcomes: the pass-on finding is favorable to Visa (limiting damages), while the permission to appeal the competition-law finding allows Visa to challenge an adverse ruling.
Show 4 minor / wording changes
Removed from previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
On December 30, 2024, the district court adopted the magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny defendants’ motion to compel arbitration and grant defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ California law claims, and plaintiffs moved for reconsideration. On May 12, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York denied plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration and their request for leave to amend the complaint, which decision plaintiffs have both appealed and moved to alter or amend.
The Consumer Interchange Litigation matter, which was disclosed in the baseline with a May 12, 2025 court decision denying plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration, is no longer separately disclosed in the current filing. This likely reflects that the matter has been dismissed or consolidated into other proceedings, or is no longer deemed material enough for standalone disclosure.
Removed from previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
On December 16, 2024, Visa filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. On June 23, 2025, the court denied the motion.
The U.S. Department of Justice antitrust matter, which was disclosed in the baseline with a June 23, 2025 denial of Visa's motion to dismiss, is no longer separately disclosed in the current filing. This is a presentational change (10-Q discloses only material developments since the prior 10-K); the case remains active and would be covered in the 10-K.
Removed from previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Between January 31, 2025, and March 27, 2025, three shareholder derivative actions were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. These actions are purportedly brought by shareholders on behalf of Visa Inc. and against certain of its current and former directors and officers. Collectively, the actions assert claims for breach of fiduciary duty and violations of Sections 10(b) and 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for failing to disclose that Visa was in violation of U.S. federal antitrust laws, as was alleged in the lawsuit filed by the U.S. Department of Justice on September 24, 2024 (see U.S. Department of Justice matter), as well as claims
under Sections 20(a) and 21D of the Exchange Act and for unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, waste of corporate assets, insider trading, and aiding and abetting. Plaintiffs seek monetary damages, corporate governance changes and other equitable relief on behalf of Visa Inc. in addition to attorneys’ fees and costs.
The three shareholder derivative actions filed between January 31, 2025 and March 27, 2025 are no longer separately disclosed in the current filing. This likely reflects that the matters have been dismissed, stayed, or consolidated, or are no longer deemed material enough for standalone disclosure in the 10-Q.
Removed from previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
On July 9, 2025, the court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the Amended Class Action Complaint, with leave to amend.
The Mirage Wine + Spirits Inc. matter, which was disclosed in the baseline with a July 9, 2025 dismissal with leave to amend, is no longer separately disclosed in the current filing. This likely reflects that the matter was not re-filed, was dismissed without re-filing, or is no longer deemed material enough for standalone disclosure.
MD&A
Revenue growth accelerated to 14-15% driven by cross-border and payments volume; operating expenses rose 13-19% on severance and marketing.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2025, net revenue increased 14% and 11% over the prior-year comparable periods, respectively
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2026, net revenue increased 14% and 15%, respectively, over the prior-year comparable periods
Nine-month net revenue growth accelerated from 11% to 15% year-over-year. The current period benefited from stronger nominal cross-border volume growth (14-15% vs. 13% in baseline) and nominal payments volume growth (10-11% vs. 5-6% in baseline), partially offset by higher client incentives. Exchange rate movements contributed approximately one percentage point to growth in both periods.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Service revenue increased over the three and nine-month prior-year comparable periods primarily due to growth in nominal payments volume of 5% and 6%, respectively
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2026, nominal payments volume growth of
11% and 10% was supported by broad-based growth across both credit and debit spending
Nominal payments volume growth nearly doubled, accelerating from 5-6% in the baseline period to 10-11% in the current period. The current filing attributes this to broad-based growth across credit and debit, with ecommerce continuing to grow faster than face-to-face spend. This is the primary driver of service revenue growth.
Previous filing · view on EDGAR →
Visa processed transactions 65,443 59,318 10 % 189,891 172,247 10 %
Current filing · view on EDGAR →
Visa processed transactions 71,662 65,443 10 % 207,148 189,891 9 %
Processed transactions growth remained steady at 9-10% year-over-year in both periods. The absolute number of transactions increased from 65.4 billion (Q3 FY25) to 71.7 billion (Q3 FY26) for the quarter, and from 189.9 billion to 207.1 billion for the nine-month period. This metric drives data processing revenue.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
For the three months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, revenue from value-added services was $2.8 billion and $2.2 billion, respectively. For the nine months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, revenue from value-added services was $7.8 billion and $6.4 billion, respectively. Value-added services revenue increased 28% and 22% over the three and nine-month prior-year comparable periods, respectively
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
For the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, revenue from value-added services was $3.8 billion and $2.8 billion, respectively. For the nine months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, revenue from value-added services was $10.3 billion and $7.8 billion, respectively. Value-added services revenue increased 33% and 32% over the three and nine-month prior-year comparable periods, respectively
Value-added services revenue growth accelerated from 22-28% in the baseline period to 32-33% in the current period. The current filing attributes growth to Issuing Solutions, Acceptance Solutions, and Advisory and Other Services, with client consulting engagements up approximately 30% and increased demand for marketing services tied to sponsorship events (FIFA World Cup 2026 and Olympic/Paralympic Winter Games Milano Cortina 2026).
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2025, operating expenses increased 35% and 26% over the prior-year comparable periods, respectively, primarily driven by higher litigation provision and personnel expenses.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2026, operating expenses increased 19% and 13%, respectively, over the prior-year comparable periods, primarily driven by higher personnel expenses. The increase over the nine-month prior-year comparable period was also driven by higher marketing expenses.
Operating expense growth decelerated significantly from 26-35% in the baseline period to 13-19% in the current period. The baseline period was heavily impacted by litigation provision increases; the current period's growth is driven by personnel expenses (including severance costs) and marketing expenses. Litigation provision actually decreased in the current period.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Personnel expenses increased over the three and nine-month prior-year comparable periods primarily due to a higher number of employees and compensation focused on areas that will drive higher long-term growth, including acquisitions. In addition, the increase over the nine-month prior-year comparable period was due to severance costs in the current period to realign our organizational structure.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Personnel expenses increased over the three and nine-month prior-year comparable periods primarily due to higher severance costs resulting from actions taken to drive operational efficiencies and reinvest in high-growth opportunities, as well as a higher number of employees and compensation costs, including from acquisitions.
The current period reports severance costs of $563 million (both three and nine months) as a non-GAAP adjustment, described as "actions taken to drive operational efficiencies and reinvest in high-growth opportunities." The baseline period reported $213 million in severance costs to "realign our organizational structure." The current period's severance is 2.6x larger and appears in both the quarterly and nine-month figures, suggesting a more significant restructuring effort.
Previous filing · view on EDGAR →
Litigation provision 615 13 NM 1,659 452 NM
Current filing · view on EDGAR →
Litigation provision 253 615 (59 %) 1,290 1,659 (22 %)
Litigation provision decreased from $615 million (Q3 FY25) to $253 million (Q3 FY26) for the quarter, and from $1,659 million to $1,290 million for the nine-month period. The current filing notes "lower accruals related to the U.S. covered litigation" as the driver. For the nine months, the company recorded additional accruals of $1.1 billion (vs. $1.5 billion in baseline) and made deposits of $875 million into the U.S. litigation escrow account (vs. $375 million in baseline).
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
For the nine months ended June 30, 2025, we repurchased 40 million shares of our class A common stock in the open market for $13.2 billion. As of June 30, 2025, our share repurchase program had remaining authorized funds of $29.8 billion.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
For the nine months ended June 30, 2026, we repurchased 50 million shares of our class A common stock in the open market for $16.5 billion. As of June 30, 2026, our share repurchase programs had remaining authorized funds of $28.4 billion.
Share repurchases increased from $13.2 billion (40 million shares) in the baseline period to $16.5 billion (50 million shares) in the current period, a 25% increase in dollar terms. The current filing also notes that in April 2026, the board authorized a new $20.0 billion share repurchase program, bringing remaining authorized funds to $28.4 billion as of June 30, 2026.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
On July 29, 2025, our board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.59 per share of class A common stock
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
On July 28, 2026, our board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.67 per share of class A common stock
The quarterly dividend increased from $0.59 per share (declared July 2025) to $0.67 per share (declared July 2026), a 13.6% increase. For the nine months ended June 30, 2026, total dividends paid were $3.9 billion vs. $3.5 billion in the baseline period.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
In February 2026, we acquired Prisma Medios de Pago S.A.U. (Prisma) and Newpay S.A.U. (Newpay) in Argentina for a total purchase consideration of $1.5 billion in cash.
The current period includes a new $1.5 billion cash acquisition of Prisma and Newpay in Argentina, completed in February 2026. This is a material capital deployment not present in the baseline period. The baseline period reported a $946 million acquisition of Featurespace in December 2024.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
In February 2026, we issued fixed-rate senior notes in a public offering in an aggregate principal amount of $3.0 billion, with maturities ranging between 3 and 10 years.
The current period includes a $3.0 billion senior notes issuance in February 2026 with 3-10 year maturities. The baseline period reported a €3.5 billion ($3.9 billion) Euro-denominated senior notes issuance in May 2025 with 3-19 year maturities. Both represent material debt capital raises.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
In May 2026, we accepted 3 million shares of class B-1 common stock and 120 million shares of class B-2 common stock tendered in the exchange offer. In exchange, we issued 61 million shares of class B-3 common stock and 23 million shares of class C common stock.
The current period includes a new class B stock exchange offer completed in May 2026, converting 123 million shares of class B-1 and B-2 stock into 61 million shares of class B-3 and 23 million shares of class C stock. This capital structure event is not present in the baseline period and relates to the company's retrospective responsibility plan mechanics.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
As of June 30, 2026, we had $1.5 billion of commercial paper outstanding. In July 2026, we increased the authorized amount of outstanding notes that can be issued under the program from $3.0 billion to $7.0 billion. As of July 28, 2026, we had $500 million of commercial paper outstanding.
The current filing discloses $1.5 billion of commercial paper outstanding as of June 30, 2026, and notes that the authorized program size was increased from $3.0 billion to $7.0 billion in July 2026. The baseline filing did not disclose commercial paper balances or program details, suggesting either no material usage or a new disclosure practice.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2026, a deferred tax benefit of $18 million and $351 million, respectively, due to a change in the U.S. taxation of certain foreign earnings
The current period includes a new deferred tax benefit of $351 million ($18 million, nine months) due to a change in U.S. taxation of certain foreign earnings. This is excluded from non-GAAP results as a one-time non-cash benefit. The baseline period did not report a comparable item.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
In response to recent regulatory developments in Brazil mandating enhanced requirements for payments networks like Visa, we have submitted to the Central Bank of Brazil enhanced operating rule provisions, which reflect the impacts of the stricter regulatory standard and will require us to extend settlement guarantees to sellers. When our new rules are approved, we expect that our settlement exposure will increase, and as such, are reassessing our collateral requirements and risk mitigation framework.
The current filing adds new disclosure about regulatory developments in Brazil that will require Visa to extend settlement guarantees to sellers, increasing settlement exposure. The company is reassessing collateral requirements and risk mitigation in response. This is a new regulatory development not present in the baseline period.
Show 3 minor / wording changes
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, which modernizes the accounting for internal-use software by eliminating project stage-based capitalization and clarifying the probable-to-complete threshold to commence the capitalization of software costs. This ASU is effective for our annual and interim periods beginning October 1, 2028, and transition approaches include prospective, retrospective or modified methods. We are currently evaluating the impact of the ASU on our consolidated financial statements.
The current filing adds disclosure of a new accounting standard (ASU 2025-06) issued in September 2025 that will change how internal-use software costs are capitalized, effective October 1, 2028. This is a new standard not present in the baseline period.
Removed from previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) published administrative guidance around the implementation of a 15% global minimum tax (Pillar Two). Various OECD member countries have either enacted or are in the process of enacting Pillar Two legislation. While we do not expect a material tax impact in fiscal 2025, we are monitoring developments and evaluating the potential impact of Pillar Two on future years.
The baseline filing included a paragraph discussing OECD Pillar Two global minimum tax developments and their potential future impact. This disclosure is absent from the current filing. This is a lifecycle removal — the baseline's forward-looking statement about "fiscal 2025" is now in the past, and the company has not provided an update on Pillar Two's actual impact or ongoing monitoring.
Removed from previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
On July 4, 2025, U.S. tax legislation was enacted into law, including the allowance of accelerated tax deductions for qualified property and research expenditures, as well as changes in international provisions. The changes are applicable to Visa with effective dates ranging from January 2025 through fiscal 2027. We are in the process of evaluating the impact to our consolidated financial statements.
The baseline filing disclosed U.S. tax legislation enacted on July 4, 2025, with effective dates ranging from January 2025 through fiscal 2027. This disclosure is absent from the current filing. This is a lifecycle removal — the baseline's "we are in the process of evaluating" language suggests the evaluation has concluded or the impact was immaterial and no longer requires separate disclosure.
Notes
Prisma/Newpay acquisition in Argentina ($1.5B), litigation accrual increased $1.1B for interchange MDL, class B-1/B-2 exchange offer, new DOJ/securities/derivative cases.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
In February 2026, Visa acquired 100% of the equity interest of each of Prisma Medios de Pago S.A.U. (Prisma) and Newpay S.A.U. (Newpay) in Argentina for a total purchase consideration of $1.5 billion in cash. Prisma provides credit, debit and prepaid card issuer processing. Newpay is a multi-network infrastructure provider that operates real-time payments services, the Banelco ATM network and the bill payment platform PagoMisCuentas.
Visa completed a $1.5 billion acquisition of Prisma and Newpay in Argentina in February 2026. Prisma provides card issuer processing; Newpay operates real-time payments, the Banelco ATM network, and a bill payment platform. The purchase price was allocated to technology ($184M), customer relationships ($405M), deferred tax liabilities ($199M), other net assets ($85M), and goodwill ($1,034M). The acquisition is subject to review by the Argentine competition authority.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
In May 2026, Visa accepted 3 million shares of class B-1 common stock and 120 million shares of class B-2 common stock tendered in the exchange offer. In exchange, Visa issued 61 million shares of class B-3 common stock and 23 million shares of class C common stock. The class B-1 and B-2 common shares exchanged have been retired. Future conversion rate adjustments for the class B-3 common stock will have four times and two times the impact compared to conversion rate adjustments for the class B-1 and B-2 common stock, respectively.
Visa completed a new exchange offer in May 2026, accepting 3M class B-1 shares and 120M class B-2 shares in exchange for 61M newly-issued class B-3 shares and 23M class C shares. The B-1 and B-2 shares tendered were retired. The B-3 shares have conversion rate adjustments with four times the impact of B-1 and two times the impact of B-2, concentrating the retrospective responsibility plan's dilution effect on a smaller share base.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
For the nine months ended June 30, 2025, the Company recorded additional accruals of $1.5 billion and deposited $375 million into the U.S. litigation escrow account to address claims associated with the interchange multidistrict litigation.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
For the nine months ended June 30, 2026, the Company recorded additional accruals of $1.1 billion and deposited $875 million into the U.S. litigation escrow account to address claims associated with the interchange multidistrict litigation.
For the nine months ended June 30, 2026, Visa recorded $1.1 billion in additional interchange MDL accruals (down from $1.5 billion in the prior-year period) and deposited $875 million into the U.S. litigation escrow account (up from $375 million). The accrual balance of $1.1 billion as of June 30, 2026 is $822 million, down from $2,255 million a year earlier, reflecting $3.0 billion in payments during the nine-month period (primarily to opt-out and injunctive relief class merchants).
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Visa has reached settlements with a number of merchants representing approximately 82% of the Visa-branded payment card sales volume of merchants who opted out of the Amended Settlement Agreement with the Damages Class plaintiffs.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Visa has reached settlements with a number of merchants representing approximately 95% of the Visa-branded payment card sales volume of merchants who opted out of the Amended Settlement Agreement with the Damages Class plaintiffs. As a result of settlements reached during the three months ended March 31, 2026, all actions that were scheduled for trial beginning in April 2026 in the Southern District of New York have been resolved.
Visa increased its opt-out merchant settlement coverage from approximately 82% of Visa-branded payment card sales volume (as of June 30, 2025) to approximately 95% (as of June 30, 2026). The current filing also discloses that all actions scheduled for trial beginning in April 2026 in the Southern District of New York have been resolved, indicating substantial progress in resolving individual merchant litigation.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
On November 10, 2025, Visa and Mastercard entered into a superseding and amended settlement agreement to resolve the Injunctive Relief Class claims and the Injunctive Relief Class plaintiffs filed a motion for preliminary approval of the settlement, which was granted on June 9, 2026. On July 15, 2026, the Injunctive Relief Class plaintiffs filed a motion for final approval of the settlement.
Visa and Mastercard entered into a superseding and amended settlement agreement on November 10, 2025 to resolve the Injunctive Relief Class claims in the interchange MDL. The court granted preliminary approval on June 9, 2026, and plaintiffs filed a motion for final approval on July 15, 2026. This represents a significant procedural milestone toward resolving the injunctive relief portion of the MDL.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
On April 21, 2026, Potayto-Potahto, LLC and two other merchants filed a class action complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Visa Inc., Visa U.S.A., Visa International, Mastercard Incorporated, and Mastercard International Incorporated, asserting violations of federal antitrust laws consistent with allegations made in MDL 1720. The complaint is brought on behalf of merchants that have accepted Visa and/or Mastercard credit cards since January 25, 2019, and seeks damages from that date.
Three merchants filed a new class action on April 21, 2026 (Potayto-Potahto Interchange Litigation) asserting federal antitrust violations consistent with the interchange MDL allegations, on behalf of merchants accepting Visa/Mastercard credit cards since January 25, 2019. The plaintiffs also filed a motion for partial summary judgment in MDL 1720 seeking to invalidate the forward-looking release in the Amended Settlement Agreement. Defendants filed a motion to stay, and the MDL Panel entered a Conditional Transfer Order to MDL 1720, which plaintiffs have opposed.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
On June 25, 2025, a judgment was handed down by the CAT determining that certain interchange rates restrict competition under UK antitrust law.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
On February 18, 2026, the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) issued a decision finding that, except in certain merchant categories, interchange was not passed on by merchants, and Visa has sought permission from the UK Court of Appeal to appeal that decision. On March 17, 2026, the UK Court of Appeal granted Visa permission to appeal the June 2025 decision by the CAT that certain interchange rates restrict competition under UK competition law.
The UK Competition Appeal Tribunal issued a decision on February 18, 2026 finding that, except in certain merchant categories, interchange was not passed on by merchants. Visa has sought permission to appeal this decision. Separately, on March 17, 2026, the UK Court of Appeal granted Visa permission to appeal the June 2025 CAT decision that certain interchange rates restrict competition under UK competition law. These developments represent ongoing litigation over the competitive effects and pass-through of interchange fees in the UK.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
On April 20, 2026, a group of merchants from across Europe filed a claim in the UK High Court against several Visa entities. The merchants allege that interchange fees on transactions in Europe are an unlawful restriction of competition and seek damages for the period from January 1, 2019 to present.
In May and June 2026, additional merchants asserted claims in the UK High Court against several Visa entities. The merchants allege that interchange fees on transactions in Europe are an unlawful restriction of competition. The plaintiffs’ damages period goes back at least six years from filing.
In April, May, and June 2026, multiple groups of merchants filed new claims in the UK High Court against Visa entities, alleging that interchange fees on European transactions are an unlawful restriction of competition. The April 2026 claim seeks damages from January 1, 2019 to present; the May/June claims seek damages going back at least six years from filing. This represents a material expansion of European merchant litigation beyond the existing 1,200+ Merchant claims disclosed in prior periods.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
On November 26, 2024, plaintiffs in the four putative class actions brought on behalf of merchants then-pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York moved to consolidate their cases, appoint interim leadership, and enter an interim schedule, which the court granted. On December 16, 2024, those plaintiffs filed an amended consolidated complaint. On December 13, 2024, plaintiffs in three putative class actions brought on behalf of cardholders pending in or being transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York moved to consolidate their cases, appoint interim leadership and enter an interim schedule, which the court granted. Two remaining cardholder actions were subsequently transferred to that court. On December 27, 2024, plaintiffs in the consolidated cardholder actions filed an amended consolidated complaint.
Current filing · view on EDGAR → · paraphrased
On December 16, 2024, those plaintiffs filed an amended consolidated complaint. On December 13, 2024, plaintiffs in three putative class actions brought on behalf of cardholders pending in or being transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York moved to consolidate their cases, appoint interim leadership and enter an interim schedule, which the court granted. Two remaining cardholder actions were subsequently transferred to that court. On December 27, 2024, plaintiffs in the consolidated cardholder actions filed an amended consolidated complaint. On February 27, 2026, merchants and cardholders filed further amended consolidated complaints, both of which added several putative class representatives.
On February 27, 2026, both the merchant and cardholder plaintiffs in the U.S. Debit Class Actions filed further amended consolidated complaints, adding several putative class representatives. This represents an expansion of the plaintiff group in the consolidated debit litigation, which was initially consolidated in late 2024.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
On November 20, 2024, Beibei Cai filed a putative securities class action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against Visa Inc., and certain of our officers on behalf of all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired publicly traded Visa securities between November 16, 2023 and September 23, 2024. The complaint alleges that defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5 in failing to disclose that Visa was in violation of U.S. federal antitrust laws, as was alleged in the lawsuit filed by the U.S. Department of Justice on September 24, 2024 (see U.S. Department of Justice matter). The plaintiff seeks a ruling that this case may proceed as a class action, and seeks damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. On April 23, 2025, the court appointed Cai as lead representative plaintiff. On July 15, 2025 plaintiff filed an amended complaint adding certain current and former officers as defendants and bringing the action on behalf of all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired publicly traded Visa securities between March 2, 2023 and September 23, 2024.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
On December 10, 2025, the court granted Visa’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint with leave to amend, and denied the motion to strike as moot. On January 9, 2026, plaintiff filed a second amended complaint, and Visa filed a motion to dismiss on January 23, 2026, which was granted without leave to amend on June 29, 2026.
The U.S. Securities Class Action was dismissed without leave to amend on June 29, 2026, after the court granted Visa's motion to dismiss the second amended complaint. This represents a favorable resolution of the securities litigation that was filed in November 2024 following the DOJ antitrust lawsuit.
Removed from previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Between January 31, 2025, and March 27, 2025, three shareholder derivative actions were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. These actions are purportedly brought by shareholders on behalf of Visa Inc. and against certain of its current and former directors and officers. Collectively, the actions assert claims for breach of fiduciary duty and violations of Sections 10(b) and 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for failing to disclose that Visa was in violation of U.S. federal antitrust laws, as was alleged in the lawsuit filed by the U.S. Department of Justice on September 24, 2024 (see U.S. Department of Justice matter), as well as claims
under Sections 20(a) and 21D of the Exchange Act and for unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, waste of corporate assets, insider trading, and aiding and abetting. Plaintiffs seek monetary damages, corporate governance changes and other equitable relief on behalf of Visa Inc. in addition to attorneys’ fees and costs.
The derivative shareholder actions filed between January and March 2025 are no longer disclosed in the current filing. These actions were brought on behalf of Visa Inc. against certain directors and officers, asserting breach of fiduciary duty and securities law violations related to the DOJ antitrust lawsuit. The removal suggests these cases may have been dismissed, consolidated, or otherwise resolved, though no explicit status update is provided.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
On December 4, 2024, James Williams filed a putative class action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against Visa Inc. on behalf of a nationwide class of all persons in the United States who paid a surcharge when completing a purchase with a Visa debit card in a transaction with a merchant located in the United States since 2010. The complaint claims that Visa has failed to enforce its rules prohibiting merchants from surcharging those transactions, and that plaintiff and putative class members have been harmed as a result. Plaintiff asserts breach of contract, unjust enrichment and unfair competition claims, and seeks monetary damages, declaratory and injunctive relief. On February 13, 2025, Visa filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. On May 28, 2025, the district court granted Visa’s motion to dismiss with leave to amend certain claims, and plaintiff subsequently filed an amended complaint asserting substantially the same claims. On July 23, 2025, Visa filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
On December 12, 2025, the court granted Visa’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint without further leave to amend. Plaintiff appealed but subsequently dismissed its appeal.
The Debit Surcharge Class Action was dismissed without further leave to amend on December 12, 2025. The plaintiff appealed but subsequently dismissed the appeal, representing a favorable resolution of this litigation.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
On June 24, 2025, plaintiffs filed a motion for preliminary approval of class settlements with Discover and American Express.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
On February 19, 2026, plaintiffs filed a motion for final approval of the class settlement with Visa and Mastercard, as well as the class settlement with Discover and American Express, which was granted on April 28, 2026.
The EMV Chip Liability Shift class settlements with Visa, Mastercard, Discover, and American Express received final court approval on April 28, 2026, resolving this litigation.
Removed from previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
On December 16, 2024, Visa filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. On June 23, 2025, the court denied the motion.
The DOJ antitrust litigation disclosure no longer appears in the current filing's Legal Matters note. The baseline disclosed that Visa's motion to dismiss was denied on June 23, 2025. The removal suggests this matter may have been resolved, transferred, or is being disclosed elsewhere, though no explicit status update is provided in the current filing.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Balance as of end of period $ 6
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Balance as of end of period $ 89
The accrual for VE territory covered litigation increased from $6 million as of June 30, 2025 to $89 million as of June 30, 2026. For the nine months ended June 30, 2026, Visa recorded $93 million in provisions for VE territory covered litigation (up from $19 million in the prior-year period) and made $13 million in payments (down from $85 million).
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
As of June 30, 2025 and September 30, 2024, the book value of series A convertible participating preferred stock (series A preferred stock) was $388 million and $540 million, respectively.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
As of June 30, 2026 and September 30, 2025, the book value of series A convertible participating preferred stock (series A preferred stock) was $402 million and $513 million, respectively.
The book value of series A preferred stock increased from $388 million (June 30, 2025) to $402 million (June 30, 2026). The series B preferred stock book value was reduced to zero as of June 30, 2026 (from $99 million a year earlier), and series C preferred stock book value decreased to $112 million (from $384 million). For the nine months ended June 30, 2026, Visa recovered $120 million through conversion rate adjustments ($67M from series B, $53M from series C), with $3 million of the series B recovery charged to accumulated income after the book value reached zero.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR → · paraphrased
For the nine months ended June 30, 2025, shares repurchased in the open market: 40 million shares, average repurchase cost per share: $330.39, total cost: $13,241 million.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR → · paraphrased
For the nine months ended June 30, 2026, shares repurchased in the open market: 50 million shares, average repurchase cost per share: $328.29, total cost: $16,537 million.
Visa repurchased 50 million shares in the nine months ended June 30, 2026 (up from 40 million in the prior-year period) at an average cost of $328.29 per share (down from $330.39), for a total cost of $16.5 billion (up from $13.2 billion). In April 2026, the board authorized an additional $20.0 billion share repurchase program. As of June 30, 2026, remaining authorized funds were $28.4 billion.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
On July 29, 2025, the Company’s board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.59 per share of class A common stock (determined in the case of all other outstanding common and preferred stock on an as-converted basis), payable on September 2, 2025 to all holders of record as of August 12, 2025.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
On July 28, 2026, the Company’s board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.67 per share of class A common stock (determined in the case of all other outstanding common and preferred stock on an as-converted basis), payable on September 1, 2026 to all holders of record as of August 11, 2026.
Visa increased its quarterly dividend from $0.59 per share (declared July 2025) to $0.67 per share (declared July 2026), a 13.6% increase.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2025, the effective income tax rate was 17%
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2026, the effective income tax rates were 18% and 16%, respectively.
The effective income tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2026 was 18% (up from 17% in the prior-year period). For the nine months ended June 30, 2026, the rate was 16% (down from 17%). The current period includes a $351 million deferred tax benefit due to a change in U.S. taxation of certain foreign earnings and a $217 million tax benefit from a tax position taken on certain expenses.
Show 4 minor / wording changes
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
On March 24, 2025, the court dismissed with prejudice MiCamp Solutions’ constitutional law claims, dismissed with leave to amend its federal and state antitrust claims and state data privacy law claims, and denied a motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction that MiCamp Solutions filed on March 6, 2025. On April 14, 2025, MiCamp Solutions filed a second amended complaint alleging violations of federal and state antitrust and unfair competition laws based on Visa’s assessment of fees for non-compliance with its surcharge rules. On May 28, 2025, Visa filed a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
On December 11, 2025, the court granted Visa’s motion to dismiss and dismissed plaintiffs’ case without further leave to amend.
The MiCamp Solutions case was dismissed without further leave to amend on December 11, 2025, representing a favorable resolution of this litigation that alleged antitrust and unfair competition violations related to Visa's surcharge rule non-compliance fees.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Visa’s challenge to the jurisdiction of the German courts to hear the claims is pending in the German Federal Supreme Court.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
On June 18, 2026, the German Federal Court of Justice requested a preliminary ruling from the European Court of Justice regarding questions relating to Visa’s jurisdictional challenges.
The German Federal Court of Justice requested a preliminary ruling from the European Court of Justice on June 18, 2026 regarding Visa's jurisdictional challenges in the German ATM litigation. This represents a procedural development that will likely extend the timeline for resolution of the jurisdictional question.
Removed from previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
On July 9, 2025, the court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the Amended Class Action Complaint, with leave to amend.
The Mirage Wine + Spirits case is no longer disclosed in the current filing. The baseline disclosed that the court granted defendants' motion to dismiss the Amended Class Action Complaint with leave to amend on July 9, 2025. The removal suggests the case may have been dismissed without further amendment or otherwise resolved.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
In November 2025, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update 2025-09, which includes amendments to more closely align hedge accounting with the economics of an entity’s risk management activities. During the three months ended December 31, 2025, the Company early adopted this standard on a prospective basis. The adoption did not have a material impact on the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Visa early adopted ASU 2025-09 during the three months ended December 31, 2025, which aligns hedge accounting more closely with risk management activities. The adoption did not have a material impact on the financial statements.
Financial Statements
Primary statements as printed on the EDGAR filing (iXBRL face). Companyfacts is used only when a statement is not on the HTML face. Not generated by the model.
Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
(in millions, except per share data)
| Description | Three months ended June 30, 2026 | Three months ended June 30, 2025 | Nine months ended June 30, 2026 | Nine months ended June 30, 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net revenue | 11,633 | 10,172 | 33,764 | 29,276 |
| Operating Expenses | ||||
| Personnel | 2,458 | 1,749 | 6,063 | 5,219 |
| Marketing | 649 | 421 | 1,604 | 1,108 |
| Network and processing | 280 | 224 | 773 | 655 |
| Professional fees | 246 | 187 | 692 | 503 |
| Depreciation and amortization | 367 | 317 | 1,026 | 904 |
| General and administrative | 503 | 482 | 1,468 | 1,382 |
| Litigation provision | 253 | 615 | 1,290 | 1,659 |
| Total operating expenses | 4,756 | 3,995 | 12,916 | 11,430 |
| Operating income | 6,877 | 6,177 | 20,848 | 17,846 |
| Non-operating Income (Expense) | ||||
| Interest expense | (194) | (39) | (566) | (379) |
| Investment income (expense) and other | 150 | 195 | 451 | 504 |
| Total non-operating income (expense) | (44) | 156 | (115) | 125 |
| Income before income taxes | 6,833 | 6,333 | 20,733 | 17,971 |
| Income tax provision | 1,205 | 1,061 | 3,231 | 3,003 |
| Net income | 5,628 | 5,272 | 17,502 | 14,968 |
| Basic Earnings Per Share | ||||
| Class A common stock | 2.97 | 2.69 | 9.15 | 7.60 |
| Class B-1 common stock | 4.59 | 4.21 | 14.18 | 11.88 |
| Class B-2 common stock | 4.47 | 4.13 | 13.85 | 11.70 |
| Class B-3 common stock(1) | 4.47 | — | 13.77 | — |
| Class C common stock | 11.87 | 10.78 | 36.58 | 30.39 |
| Basic Weighted-average Shares Outstanding | ||||
| Class A common stock | 1,673 | 1,709 | 1,678 | 1,720 |
| Class B-1 common stock | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Class B-2 common stock | 53 | 120 | 98 | 120 |
| Class B-3 common stock(1) | 34 | — | 11 | — |
| Class C common stock | 18 | 9 | 12 | 9 |
| Diluted Earnings Per Share | ||||
| Class A common stock | 2.97 | 2.69 | 9.14 | 7.59 |
| Class B-1 common stock | 4.59 | 4.20 | 14.17 | 11.87 |
| Class B-2 common stock | 4.47 | 4.13 | 13.83 | 11.69 |
| Class B-3 common stock(1) | 4.47 | — | 13.76 | — |
| Class C common stock | 11.86 | 10.77 | 36.55 | 30.35 |
| Diluted Weighted-average Shares Outstanding | ||||
| Class A common stock | 1,898 | 1,959 | 1,916 | 1,973 |
| Class B-1 common stock | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Class B-2 common stock | 53 | 120 | 98 | 120 |
| Class B-3 common stock(1) | 34 | — | 11 | — |
| Class C common stock | 18 | 9 | 12 | 9 |
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
(in millions, except per share data)
| Description | June 30, 2026 | September 30, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Assets | ||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 12,359 | 17,164 |
| Restricted cash equivalents—U.S. litigation escrow | 888 | 2,990 |
| Investment securities | 1,433 | 1,833 |
| Settlement receivable | 2,400 | 4,191 |
| Accounts receivable | 3,527 | 3,126 |
| Customer collateral | 4,310 | 3,625 |
| Current portion of client incentives | 2,523 | 2,158 |
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 3,562 | 2,679 |
| Total current assets | 31,002 | 37,766 |
| Investment securities | 150 | 999 |
| Client incentives | 5,884 | 5,157 |
| Property, equipment and technology, net | 4,858 | 4,236 |
| Goodwill | 20,825 | 19,879 |
| Intangible assets, net | 27,532 | 27,646 |
| Other assets | 4,339 | 3,944 |
| Total assets | 94,590 | 99,627 |
| Liabilities | ||
| Accounts payable | 553 | 555 |
| Settlement payable | 3,277 | 4,568 |
| Customer collateral | 4,310 | 3,625 |
| Accrued compensation and benefits | 2,219 | 1,863 |
| Client incentives | 11,429 | 10,369 |
| Accrued liabilities | 5,409 | 5,466 |
| Current maturities of debt | 2,996 | 5,569 |
| Accrued litigation | 1,274 | 3,033 |
| Total current liabilities | 31,467 | 35,048 |
| Long-term debt | 20,862 | 19,602 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 5,219 | 5,549 |
| Other liabilities | 1,864 | 1,519 |
| Total liabilities | 59,412 | 61,718 |
| Commitments and contingencies (Note 14 and Note 16) | ||
| Equity | ||
| Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 5 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2026 and September 30, 2025 | 514 | 745 |
| Common stock, $0.0001 par value: | ||
| Class A common stock, 1,702 and 1,691 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2026 and September 30, 2025, respectively | — | — |
| Class B-1, B-2 and B-3 total common stock, 63 and 125 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2026 and September 30, 2025, respectively | — | — |
| Class C common stock, 18 and 9 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2026 and September 30, 2025, respectively | — | — |
| Right to recover for covered losses | (111) | (124) |
| Additional paid-in capital | 22,168 | 21,934 |
| Accumulated income | 12,753 | 15,106 |
| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss): | ||
| Investment securities | 2 | 12 |
| Defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans | (25) | (32) |
| Derivative instruments | (129) | (307) |
| Foreign currency translation adjustments | 6 | 575 |
| Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (146) | 248 |
| Total equity | 35,178 | 37,909 |
| Total liabilities and equity | 94,590 | 99,627 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
(in millions)
| Description | Nine months ended June 30, 2026 | Nine months ended June 30, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Activities | ||
| Net income | 17,502 | 14,968 |
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | ||
| Client incentives | 13,194 | 11,503 |
| Share-based compensation | 728 | 706 |
| Depreciation and amortization | 1,026 | 904 |
| Deferred income taxes | (638) | 347 |
| VE territory covered losses | (108) | (22) |
| (Gains) losses on equity investments, net | 31 | 133 |
| Other | 16 | 70 |
| Change in operating assets and liabilities: | ||
| Settlement receivable | 1,761 | (211) |
| Accounts receivable | (368) | (334) |
| Client incentives | (13,121) | (11,253) |
| Other assets | (832) | (18) |
| Accounts payable | (28) | (14) |
| Settlement payable | (1,436) | 619 |
| Accrued and other liabilities | 373 | (1,199) |
| Accrued litigation | (1,758) | 622 |
| Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | 16,342 | 16,821 |
| Investing Activities | ||
| Purchases of property, equipment and technology | (1,178) | (1,093) |
| Purchases of investment securities | (50) | — |
| Proceeds from maturities and sales of investment securities | 1,280 | 2,468 |
| Acquisitions, net of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents acquired | (705) | (887) |
| Purchases of other investments | (97) | (41) |
| Other investing activities | (5) | (43) |
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | (755) | 404 |
| Financing Activities | ||
| Repurchases of class A common stock | (16,430) | (13,389) |
| Repayments of senior notes | (5,565) | — |
| Dividends paid | (3,852) | (3,488) |
| Proceeds from issuance of senior notes | 2,995 | 3,924 |
| Net proceeds from issuance (repayments) of commercial paper | 1,496 | — |
| Proceeds from stock issued under equity plans | 204 | 341 |
| Taxes paid related to stock issued under equity plans | (272) | (254) |
| Other financing activities | (116) | (97) |
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | (21,540) | (12,963) |
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents | (266) | 416 |
| Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents | (6,219) | 4,678 |
| Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents as of beginning of period | 24,987 | 19,763 |
| Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents as of end of period | 18,768 | 24,441 |
| Supplemental Disclosure | ||
| Cash paid for income taxes, net(1) | 4,887 | 3,587 |
| Interest payments on debt | 600 | 539 |
| Accruals related to purchases of property, equipment and technology | 125 | 51 |
Amounts as printed on the EDGAR/iXBRL face — (in millions, except per share data); (in millions). Labels, columns, and figures are the filing face, not a GAAP stencil. Interactive statements & notes on EDGAR ↗
Thanks — your feedback helps us improve report quality.
Figures/quotes linked to EDGAR · Narrative written by AI · Jul 30, 2026 · How we verify