NASDAQ: RNTX
Rein Therapeutics, Inc.CIK 0001420565 · Health Care · SIC 2834 · Pharmaceutical Preparations
We are a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing novel therapies for the treatment of orphan pulmonary and fibrosis indications with no approved or limited effective treatments. We currently have two product candidates in clinical development, LTI-03 and LTI-01, however, due… About this business →
Each report below shows a 3-bullet preview. Free accounts read 3 full reports a month — narrative summary, section diffs, and EDGAR-cited quotes.
Sign up freeWant to see a complete report first? Today's free report (WS 10-K) is open in full — no account needed.
Summary not yet generated.
Summary not yet generated.
Partner
Trade RNTX commission-free
Open an account, get a free stock.
Investing involves risk. Free stock terms apply.
Summary not yet generated.
Summary not yet generated.
Summary not yet generated.
Summary not yet generated.
Summary not yet generated.
Summary not yet generated.
Summary not yet generated.
Summary not yet generated.
Summary not yet generated.
Summary not yet generated.
Summary not yet generated.
Summary not yet generated.
Summary not yet generated.
Summary not yet generated.
Summary not yet generated.
Summary not yet generated.
Latest financial statements
From 10-Q filed May 15, 2026 (period ending Mar 31, 2026). SEC XBRL (companyfacts) — not generated by the model.
Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
| Description | Q1 ended Mar 31, 2026 | Q3 ended Sep 30, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue: | ||
| Total revenue / net sales | — | — |
| Operating expenses: | ||
| Research and development | 3.1 | 1.7 |
| General and administrative | 2.2 | 3.8 |
| Total operating expenses | 5.2 | 5.5 |
| Operating income | (5.2) | (5.5) |
| Other income/(expense), net | (0.6) | (0.09) |
| Net income | (5.8) | (5.6) |
| Basic earnings per share | (0.19) | (0.21) |
| Diluted earnings per share | (0.19) | (0.21) |
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
| Description | Mar 31, 2026 | Dec 31, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Current assets: | ||
| Cash and equivalents | 4.4 | 3.2 |
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 1.0 | 1.1 |
| Total current assets | 5.5 | 4.3 |
| Identifiable intangible assets, net | 13.5 | 13.5 |
| Goodwill | 6.3 | 6.3 |
| Deferred income taxes and other assets | 1.0 | — |
| TOTAL ASSETS | 26.3 | 24.2 |
| Current liabilities: | ||
| Accounts payable | 6.3 | 4.0 |
| Other current liabilities | 7.4 | 2.2 |
| Total current liabilities | 13.6 | 6.2 |
| Deferred income taxes and other liabilities | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Total liabilities | 14.7 | 7.2 |
| Redeemable preferred stock | 45.0 | 45.0 |
| Shareholders' equity: | ||
| Common stock | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Capital in excess of stated value | 373.6 | 373.1 |
| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (0.06) | (0.06) |
| Retained earnings (deficit) | (407.1) | (401.3) |
| Total shareholders' equity | 11.6 | 16.9 |
| TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | 26.3 | 24.2 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
| Description | Q1 ended Mar 31, 2026 | Nine months ended Sep 30, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Activities: | ||
| Net cash from operating activities | (3.4) | (16.1) |
| Financing Activities: | ||
| Net cash from financing activities | 4.7 | 7.3 |
| Net increase/(decrease) in cash | 1.2 | (8.8) |
Amounts in millions USD; EPS as reported. Line labels are presentation-friendly mappings of filer XBRL tags — not a re-audit of the full statements. Use EDGAR for interactive notes and detail. Interactive statements & notes on EDGAR ↗
About Rein Therapeutics, Inc.
Source: Item 1 (Business) from the 10-K filed March 26, 2026. Description as filed by the company with the SEC.
Item 1. Business
Overview and Recent Developments
We are a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing novel therapies for the treatment of orphan pulmonary and fibrosis indications with no approved or limited effective treatments. We currently have two product candidates in clinical development, LTI-03 and LTI-01, however, due to insufficient funding we have paused development of LTI‑01 for an undetermined period of time and are prioritizing LTI‑03. Our pipeline includes:
•
LTI-03, a peptide, for which we conducted a Phase 1b dose-ranging, placebo-controlled safety, tolerability, and pharmacodynamic biomarker activity trial in development for the treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, or IPF, that has demonstrated the ability to protect healthy lung epithelial cells and reduce pro-fibrotic signaling;
•
LTI-01, a proenzyme that completed a Phase 2a dose-ranging, placebo-controlled trial and a Phase 1b safety, tolerability and proof of mechanism trial in loculated pleural effusion, or LPE, patients, an indication that has no approved drug treatment; and
•
preclinical programs targeting cystic fibrosis and a peptide program focused on the Cav1 protein for systemic fibrosis indications.
In June 2024, we decided to temporarily delay clinical development of LTI-01 in an effort to focus our resources on clinical development of LTI-03 and until additional funds are raised. In the fourth quarter of 2024, we determined that the temporary delay of further clinical development of LTI-01 may not be a short-term measure. In the fourth quarter of 2025, we decided to pause development activities related to LTI-01 and preclinical programs targeting cystic fibrosis and a peptide program focused on the Cav1 protein for an indefinite period.
Read full description ↓
Principal Product Candidates
LTI-03
LTI-03 is a novel peptide drug, the sequence of which is derived from the endogenous protein Cav1, that protects lung epithelial cells and inhibits multiple pro-fibrotic pathways in IPF patients. IPF is a progressive, fatal, age-associated lung disease with a median survival from diagnosis of three to five years. There are approximately 100,000 people living with IPF in the U.S. LTI-03 has been granted Orphan Drug Designation in the U.S. and European Union, or EU, for the treatment of IPF.
The pathogenesis of IPF is characterized by the loss of healthy lung cells known as alveolar epithelial type 2 cells, or AEC2s, proliferation and accumulation of activated myofibroblasts, deposition of extracellular matrix, or ECM, and fibrosis, resulting in labored breathing and loss of lung function. Damaged AEC2s are unable to replace injured alveolar epithelial type 1 cells, or AEC1s, which make up the majority of the alveolar surface and are important in mucus clearance and healthy lung function. Other than lung transplantation, no treatment has shown survival benefit. Three approved drugs, Nerandomilast (Jascayd®), nintedanib (OFEV®) and pirfenidone, have been shown to reduce the rate of lung function decline, but unfortunately provide only modest clinical benefit in IPF patients. No drug is curative, and significant side effects or intolerance can occur with the use of these therapies. As these approved drugs are focused on fibroblast proliferation, they have not demonstrated an effect on protecting or restoring healthy lung epithelial cells. We believe LTI-03 has a mechanism that not only reduces fibroblast proliferation but also, importantly, protects and potentially restores healthy lung epithelial cells.
Cav1 normally serves a critical function in the prevention of fibrosis by maintaining a balance between pathways that both initiate and arrest lung repair and cell movement. Studies conducted by third parties have shown decreased levels of Cav1 in patients with IPF and the development of fibrosis in Cav1 knock-out models of fibrosis. Furthermore, we have conducted in vitro and animal model tests with LTI-03 in which we have observed a reduction in numerous pro-fibrotic signaling proteins. In analyzing fibrotic activity in a sample precision cut lung slice, or PCLS, tissue from an end stage IPF lung, LTI-03 demonstrated a broad anti-fibrotic activity similar to that of nintedanib in a single patient sample and composite of six patient samples.
5
In additional PCLS testing of end stage IPF lungs with LTI-03, we observed increased viable AEC2s that are important for epithelial regeneration and proper lung function. We believe that this protection of AEC2s has the potential to improve IPF patients’ underlying disease.
The soluble Receptor of Advanced Glycation End-products, or sRAGE, is a prognostic marker of IPF disease progression and is produced by AEC1s. Low levels of sRAGE at diagnosis predict poor survival in IPF and as IPF patients’ disease worsens, sRAGE declines. In further testing of PCLS tissue, LTI-03 administration demonstrated an increase in sRAGE versus untreated control samples. We believe the increase in sRAGE provides further evidence of increased AEC2 survival, possibly leading to greater AEC1 production and thus overall epithelial cell survival, and therefore the elevation of sRAGE levels after administration of LTI-03 in the PCLS model may indicate a beneficial impact of LTI-03 in treating IPF patients.
Phase 1a Clinical Trial
We completed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 1a clinical trial of LTI-03 in healthy volunteers in the United Kingdom, or the UK. The primary objective of this trial was to determine the safety and tolerability of single and multiple ascending doses, SAD and MAD, respectively, of inhaled LTI-03. The secondary objective was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of SAD and MAD daily doses for 14 days of inhaled LTI-03.
In four SAD cohorts, 32 subjects were administered LTI-03 by inhalation at single doses of 20 mg, 40 mg, and 80 mg. At the 80 mg dose, subjects in one cohort were administered four 20 mg capsules by inhalation and in a second cohort, subjects were administered eight 10 mg capsules by inhalation. Eight subjects in the combined SAD cohorts were administered a placebo. In the SAD cohorts, 21 of 24 subjects administered LTI-03 experienced treatment emergent adverse events, or TEAE, the most frequent of which were mild dry coughs related to LTI-03.
In two MAD cohorts, 40 subjects were administered LTI-03 by inhalation once daily for up to 14 days at 20 mg and 40 mg. Mild coughs, assessed as related to LTI-03, were the most frequent TEAEs occurring in 12 of 12 subjects over the course of the 14-day dosing period. Mild and related coughs occurred in three of the four subjects administered placebo. Other TEAEs occurring in more than one of the 12 subjects administered LTI-03 included sinus tachycardia, which is a fast increase in heart rate, in two subjects assessed as mild and not related in one and moderate and related in the other; chest discomfort in two subjects assessed as related and moderate in one and related and severe in the other; and labored breathing in two subjects assessed as related and moderate in one and related and severe in the other. During dosing in the second MAD cohort of 40 mg of LTI-03, we placed the study on hold after one subject developed severe TEAEs and two other subjects developed moderate TEAEs secondary to pulmonary airflow limitations that appeared to be secondary to reversible airway obstruction. These events were considered related to LTI-03. All TEAEs were resolved within 24 hours.
Adverse findings in the MAD 40 mg cohort, and a re-evaluation of the dose rationale based on further analysis of in vitro and in vivo data, suggest that lower doses should be efficacious with an improved safety profile. The 20 mg and 40 mg doses evaluated are predicted to be 21- to 39-fold in excess of a minimally efficacious dose. Based upon these MAD observations, three additional MAD cohorts of 2.5 mg administered once daily, 5 mg (two 2.5 mg capsules), and 10 mg (two 2.5 mg capsules dosed twice daily) were administered to 17 subjects for 14 days. In these lower dose cohorts, the most common TEAEs related to LTI-03 were mild coughs in 41% of subjects. The only other TEAEs occurring in more than one subject was mild throat irritation in two subjects that were assessed as related to LTI-03. The were no moderate, severe, or serious TEAEs assessed as related to LTI-03.
Upon review of pooled plasma samples from patients in all Phase 1a cohorts up to 20 mg, there was an increase in sRAGE from day 13 treatment compared to pre-treatment for patients who received LTI-03 compared to patients who received placebo.
Phase 1b Clinical Trial
We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 1b clinical trial of LTI-03 in IPF patients, which was conducted at 11 centers in the U.S., the UK, Belgium, Germany and Australia. We enrolled a total of 24 patients in the trial. In the trial, these patients had a bronchoscopy at a baseline screening followed by either LTI-03 or placebo twice a day for 14 days. On day 14, shortly after the final dose, patients received a second bronchoscopy and were monitored thereafter for seven days. In Cohort 1, patients in the active arm inhaled a single 2.5 mg capsule of LTI-03 twice daily. In Cohort 2, patients received two 2.5 mg capsules of LTI-03 for inhalation twice daily. Of the 12 patients enrolled in Cohort 1 of the trial, three were randomized to the placebo arm and nine to the active arm.
6
Of the 12 patients enrolled in Cohort 1 of the trial, three were randomized to the placebo arm and nine to the active arm. In addition to the safety and tolerability of LTI-03, in the trial, various biomarkers relating to epithelial damage, fibrosis and inflammation in blood cells were assessed. The eight biomarkers that we evaluated in Cohort 1 included: thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), galectin-7 (GAL-7), interleukin-11 (IL-11), collagen 1 alpha chain (Col-1α1), phosphorylated SMAD2/3 (pSMAD2/3/tSMAD2/3), phosphorylated AKT kinase (pAKT), soluble (sol) receptor for advanced glycation end-products (solRAGE), and CXC chemokine 7 (CXCL7). The eight biomarkers that we evaluated in Cohort 2 included: TSLP, GAL-7, IL-11, Col-1α1, pSMAD2/3/tSMAD2/3, pAKT, CXCL7, and surfactant protein D (SPD). SolRAGE, which was evaluated in Cohort 1, was not able to be evaluated in Cohort 2 due to multiple protocol violations.
In May 2024, we announced positive data from the low-dose Cohort 1 of the Phase 1b clinical trial.
In Cohort 1, a positive trend was observed in seven out of the eight biomarkers with data from three biomarkers being statistically significant (based on a one-tailed t-test). The findings from Cohort 1 included:
•
LTI-03 reduced expression of multiple profibrotic proteins in both pathologic basal-like cells and fibroblasts, with statistically significant decreases observed in three biomarkers - GAL-7 (p=0.0014, SEM 0.901), TSLP (p=0.0223, SEM 5.163) and Col-1α1 (p=0.0489, SEM 0.7102) - supporting the potential of LTI-03 to reduce fibrosis, inflammation and associated changes in the lung.
•
LTI-03 stimulated production of solRAGE (p=0.1407, SEM 0.3269), a factor indicative of type I epithelial cell health that is a critically important aspect of IPF and has gone largely unaddressed.
•
LTI-03 did not induce inflammation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells as measured by pAKT (p=0.358, SEM 11.32).
•
LTI-03 was generally well-tolerated with no serious adverse events reported.
In November 2024, we announced positive topline data from the high-dose Cohort 2 of the Phase 1b clinical trial.
In Cohort 2, a positive trend was observed in seven out of the eight biomarkers, with data from three biomarkers that were statistically significant in Cohort 2, and from four biomarkers that were statistically significant in the combined data set of Cohort 1 and Cohort 2, and data from five biomarkers that showed dose dependence relative to the data from those biomarkers in Cohort 1. The findings from Cohort 2 included:
•
LTI-03 reduced expression of multiple profibrotic proteins active in both pathologic basal-like cells and fibroblasts, with four biomarkers (IL-11, CXCL7, TSLP and GAL-7) showing statistically significant decreases in the combined data set supporting the potential of LTI-03 to reduce fibrosis, inflammation and associated functional changes in the lung.
•
LTI-03 dose dependent trends were observed in five biomarkers, including COL1A1, CXCL7, TSLP, GAL-7, and SPD, which provide evidence of active LTI-03 pharmacodynamics in the trial.
•
SPD, an indicator of epithelial cell health that is linked to decline in lung function, decreased by 5% in Cohort 2 at 14 days of treatment. The current standard of care for IPF, nintedanib, reduced SPD by 4% at 12-weeks in a third party trial of nintedanib referred to as the INMARK trial. The biomarker regarding change in SPD in our Phase 1b trial and the data from the INMARK trial of nintedanib compares two clinical trials with different trial designs, patient enrollment criteria and treatment regimens. In addition, the applicable measurements were observed over different time periods. As a result, the data from these trials may not be directly comparable.
•
LTI-03 did not induce inflammation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in either Cohort, measured by pAKT, a safety marker for inflammation in this trial.
•
LTI-03 was generally well-tolerated, and there were no drug-related adverse events that resulted in a discontinuation of the trial.
7
Phase 2 Clinical Trial
In May 2025, we initiated screening and recruitment of patients in the RENEW Phase 2 clinical trial of LTI-03. The RENEW trial is a Phase 2 multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of LTI-03 patients with IPF. In addition, the trial is designed to assess the activity of inhaled dry powder LTI-03 across multiple biomarkers and to measure lung function, lung imaging markers of fibrosis, and the potential for healthy tissue regeneration. The trial is designed to enroll approximately 120 patients diagnosed with IPF within 5 years of screening, who may be receiving standard of care antifibrotic therapy, across up to 50 sites globally, including sites in the U.S., UK, Germany, Australia and Poland. Patients will be randomized into two blinded placebo-controlled cohorts that will run concurrently. Patients in the low dose cohort will receive 2.5 mg of either LTI-03 or placebo administered twice daily, or BID, for a total dose of 5 mg/day, while participants in the high dose cohort will receive 5 mg BID for a total dose of 10 mg/day. The primary endpoint is the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events from Day 1 through Week 24. The key secondary endpoint is the efficacy of LTI-03 measured through forced vital capacity, percent predicted FVC and high-resolution computer tomography, in collaboration with Qureight Ltd. Patients will undergo a 28-day screening period prior to being randomized and entering the 24-week treatment period, with a four-week follow-up.
In October 2025, we received authorization from the European Medicines Agency, or the EMA, to initiate our Phase 2 RENEW trial of our lead candidate, LTI-03, for the treatment of IPF at sites in Germany and Poland. We had previously received regulatory clearance from the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, or the MHRA. In January 2026, we received orphan drug designation from the EMA for LTI-03.
As of the date of this Annual Report, we activated sites and are enrolling patients in the U.S. and are seeking to activate additional sites, enroll patients and initiate the RENEW trial throughout the U.S., UK, Europe and other jurisdictions. In March 2026, we dosed our first patient in the RENEW Phase 2 clinical trial of LTI-03. We expect to report initial interim topline data on some proportion of patients in the fourth quarter of 2026.
LTI-01
LTI-01 is a single chain urokinase plasminogen activator, or scuPA, for the treatment of LPE. Pleural effusion is defined by the build-up of fluid in the pleural cavity, predominantly resulting from pneumonia, and is considered loculated when fibrinous scar tissue forms, trapping the fluid and preventing drainage. LPE is an orphan disorder for which there are no currently approved therapeutics. LPEs are a frequent complication of pneumonia and develop from pockets of infected fluid, known as a complicated parapneumonic effusion, or CPE, or if pus is present, known as an empyema. LPEs can result in pain, shortness of breath and can rapidly lead to sepsis and death. CPE and empyema can be serious clinical problems which are associated with mortality of approximately 20%. Effective drainage of infected pleural effusions is essential for treatment. We believe over 60,000 cases of LPE associated with CPE and empyema are estimated to occur annually in the U.S. alone, and based upon our market research, over half of these patients are receiving off-label, intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy, or IPFT, which is the use of clot busting drugs injected locally into the pleural cavity to treat the LPEs. LTI-01 has been granted Orphan Drug Designation in the U.S. and EU for treatment of empyema and Fast Track Designation in the U.S. for the investigation of LTI-01 for the treatment of infected, non-draining pleural effusion. In November 2020, we signed a regional licensing deal with Taiho for the rights to develop and commercialize LTI-01 in Japan. We received an up-front payment of $5.0 million and have the right to receive a future milestone payment of $10.0 million, drug supply payments and royalties on drug sales upon approval and commercial launch in Japan.
Currently, there are no approved drug treatments for LPE. Given the risks of surgery and extensive days of hospitalization post-surgery, IPFT has been used off-label in patients with LPE to promote pleural drainage. Despite limited research of IPFT, tissue plasminogen activator, or tPA, in combination with recombinant deoxyribonuclease, or DNase, has become the off-label standard of care for treating LPEs in many institutions. Similar to off label IPFT, LTI-01 works locally in the pleural space by breaking down the fibrinous scar tissue and allowing the trapped fluid to drain. We believe there are advantages possessed by LTI-01 over other fibrinolytics which arise from the resistance of LTI-01 to a protein which is the major inhibitor of fibrinolytic activity, Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1, or PAI-1. PAI-1 has been shown to suppress fibrinolytics like tPA by binding to them and inhibiting activity. LTI-01, however, has demonstrated relative resistance to PAI-1 inhibition. Animal model studies, conducted by third parties, of PAI-1 inhibition showed LTI-01 to be active 24 hours post administration, while tPA was shown to be inactivated in as little as 40 minutes. We believe that this provides for a longer duration of activity, eliminates the need for repeated daily dosing, and could confer a lower risk of bleeding.
8
Based upon our Phase 2a and Phase 1b data and historical treatment data of LPE patients receiving off-label tPA with DNase in the U.S., we believe LTI-01 may be more beneficial to patients when compared to tPA with DNase in the treatment of LPE on dosing schedule, surgical referrals and safety profile. Furthermore, third party market research with physician interviews performed by MME, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Indegene, Inc., suggests LTI-01 could potentially replace the use of tPA with DNase for LPE patients.
Phase 2a Clinical Trial
We completed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 2a clinical trial that was conducted at 36 centers in the U.S. to evaluate LTI-01 in patients with infected, non-draining pleural effusions. The primary endpoint in the trial was treatment failure, defined as death or referral to surgery by checklist within seven days from commencement of dosing. Secondary endpoints included length of hospital stay, incidence of bleeding and pain and volume of pleural fluid drainage. The trial evaluated 3 doses of LTI-01, 400,000, 800,000 or 1.2 million units compared to placebo in a three to one active to placebo randomization. Due to trial delays related to the COVID-19 pandemic and limited shelf life of drug product, only 40 patients completed enrollment in the trial. There was not a statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint of treatment failure between treatment arms and the placebo arm. We believe this lack of significance was due to referral to surgery checklist limitations which allowed patients, including those on placebo, to be deemed a successful treatment while also receiving rescue treatment, defined as either surgery, off label IPFT or other intervention. Based upon a patient’s need for a rescue treatment, either surgery, off label IPFT or other intervention, 60.0% and 55.5% of patients in the 400,000 and 800,000 dosing arms, respectively, did not require rescue treatment to resolve their LPE. However, 27.3% of patients in the placebo dosing group did not require a rescue treatment to resolve their LPE. Moreover, the 400,000 and 800,000 dosing arms showed a meaningful reduction in volume of pleural fluid drainage, a secondary endpoint. LTI-01 was well tolerated with no safety signals of concern.
Based on the results of this trial, we plan to investigate LTI-01 in an additional Phase 2 dose-ranging, placebo-controlled clinical trial with a lower dose to establish efficacy and safety. In June 2024, we decided to temporarily delay clinical development of LTI-01 in an effort to focus our resources on clinical development of LTI-03 and until sufficient additional funds are raised. In the fourth quarter of 2024, we determined that the temporary delay of further clinical development of LTI-01 may not be a short-term measure. In the fourth quarter of 2025, as a result of our current capital limitations, we have suspended development activities for LTI‑01 for an indefinite period and are allocating our limited resources to LTI‑03 development.
Phase 1b Clinical Trial
We completed a first-in-human, open-label, dose escalation Phase 1b safety, tolerability and proof of mechanism trial of LTI-01 in 14 LPE patients presenting with pneumonia and CPE or empyema. The Phase 1b clinical trial was conducted at seven clinical centers in Australia and New Zealand. LTI-01 was administered intrapleurally once per day for up to three consecutive days at doses ranging from 50,000 units to 800,000 units. At the doses tested, LTI-01 was well tolerated and there were no safety signals of concern. Moreover, no local or systemic bleeding was observed. All adverse events observed were considered unrelated to the study drug.
LTI-01 showed preliminary signs of efficacy, with reductions in pleural opacity and declines in pleural infection indicators. Preliminary efficacy findings included signs of successful treatment of the underlying infectious process with decreased C-reactive protein, or CRP, levels and total leukocyte and neutrophil counts, drainage of the infected pleural fluid and decreases in pleural opacity. These results suggest that LTI-01 clears scar tissue with once-a-day dosing for three days and promotes fluid drainage around the lungs without bleeding and other side effects.
Preclinical Programs
We have multiple programs in preclinical development. We are developing LTI-05, an epithelial sodium channel, or ENaC, inhibitor, in lead optimization for the treatment of cystic fibrosis, or CF, that has demonstrated sodium channel inhibition and localized activity in preclinical studies. In addition, we are developing a systemic formulation of a proprietary Cav1-related peptide to be utilized for patients where a systemic delivery would be ideal. Cav1, from which LTI-03 is derived, has been widely studied for its role in the regulation of cell signaling and endocytosis and, we believe, restores balance by regulating aberrant cell signaling. Cav1 has been demonstrated to be deficient in multiple fibrotic organs in preclinical models. Independent preclinical research and our preclinical research have demonstrated the potential of a Cav1-related peptide to treat fibrosis in a number of organs, including kidney,
9
heart and skin. This preclinical program is currently in the formulation development stage. Similar to the LTI-01, we have suspended any development activities for our preclinical programs until we can raise sufficient financing and are allocating our limited resources to development of LTI‑03.
Manufacturing
We do not own or operate manufacturing facilities for the production of any of our product candidates, nor do we have plans to develop our own manufacturing operations in the foreseeable future. We currently rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third-party contract manufacturers for the manufacture of all our product candidates for preclinical research and clinical trials. We do not have long-term agreements with any of these third-party contract manufacturers.
If any of our product candidates are approved by any regulatory agency, we intend to enter into agreements with a third-party contract manufacturer and one or more back-up manufacturers for the commercial production of our product candidates. Development and commercial quantities of any drugs that we develop will need to be manufactured in facilities, and by processes, that comply with the requirements of the FDA, and the regulatory agencies of other jurisdictions in which we are seeking approval.
The risks associated with our reliance on third-party contract manufacturers are described in