NASDAQ: PAVM

Lucid Diagnostics

Overview

Lucid Diagnostics is a commercial-stage cancer prevention medical diagnostics technology company focused on patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (“GERD”), who are at risk of developing esophageal precancer and cancer, including esophageal adenocarcinoma (“EAC”). We believe that Lucid's flagship product, the EsoGuard Esophageal DNA Test, performed on samples collected with the EsoCheck Esophageal Cell Collection Device, constitutes the first and only commercially available diagnostic test capable of serving as a widespread testing tool with the goal of preventing EAC deaths, through early detection of esophageal precancer in at-risk GERD patients.

EsoGuard is a bisulfite-converted targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) DNA assay performed on esophageal cells collected with the EsoCheck device. It measures methylation at sites on the VIM and CCNA1 genes. In clinical studies, EsoGuard demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, with a negative predictive value of approximately 99% for the detection of Barrett’s esophagus (“BE”) and EAC in screening populations.

EsoCheck is an FDA 510(k)-cleared and CE Mark certified noninvasive, swallowable balloon capsule catheter designed for in-office collection of esophageal cell samples in a brief procedure. The device enables targeted sampling of esophageal cells while minimizing contamination during retrieval.

EsoGuard and EsoCheck are based on patented technology licensed from Case Western Reserve University and are intended to provide accurate, non-invasive, patient-friendly testing for the early detection of BE and EAC, including dysplastic BE and related precursors to EAC in patients with chronic GERD.

1

Market Opportunity

In 2025, approximately 22,000 U.S. GERD patients were diagnosed with EAC and approximately 16,250 died from the disease. Over 80% of EAC patients will die within five years of diagnosis, making it the second most lethal cancer in the U.S. The U.S. incidence of EAC has increased 500% over the past four decades, while the incidences of other common cancers have declined or remained flat.

Based on current guidelines published by the American Gastroenterology Association (“AGA”), we believe the cohort recommended for screening consists of an estimated 30 million U.S. individuals with at least 3 established risk factors for BE. Accordingly, we believe EsoGuard’s total addressable U.S. market opportunity approximates $60 billion based on an effective Medicare payment of $1,938 and the estimated 30 million U.S. patients recommended for screening by clinical practice guidelines.

Unfortunately, for a variety of reasons, less than 5% of at-risk patients who are recommended for screening undergo traditional invasive upper gastrointestinal endoscopy ("EGD"). We believe that the profound tragedy of an EAC diagnosis is that likely death could have been prevented if the at-risk patient had been screened and then undergone surveillance and curative endoscopic esophageal ablation of dysplastic BE.

Since mortality rates are high even in early stage EAC, preventing EAC deaths requires detection and intervention at the precancer stage. Most of the necessary elements for such an early detection program are already well established—an at-risk population (at-risk GERD patients), a precancer (BE), and an intervention which can halt progression to EAC (endoscopic esophageal ablation). Until recently, the only missing element for such an early detection program is a widespread screening tool that can detect BE prior to EAC.

We believe EsoGuard, used with EsoCheck, constitutes that missing element—the first and only commercially available diagnostic test capable of serving as a widespread testing tool with the goal of preventing EAC deaths through early detection of esophageal precancer and cancer in patients with 3 or more risk factors.

2

Commercialization

Our EsoGuard commercialization efforts span multiple channels including targeting primary care and GI physicians, who have generally embraced our message that EsoGuard has the potential to expand the funnel of BE-EAC patients who will need long term EGD surveillance and, potentially, treatment with endoscopic esophageal ablation. We also provide patient access through a limited network of our own physical Lucid Test Centers in key metropolitan areas, and a satellite test center program, whereby we are making our personnel available to perform cell collection services inside physician offices or in certain geographies. We also regularly conduct testing events, which brings our precancer testing directly to patients. We also have a direct contracting strategic initiative to engage directly with large Administrative Services Only (“ASO”) self-insured employers, unions and other entities, seeking to replicate the successes of other cancer screening diagnostic companies that have deployed similar strategies. Other commercial channels include our cash-pay program targeting concierge medicine, arrangements with health systems for comprehensive, integrated esophageal precancer testing programs, and an EsoGuard Telemedicine Program, in partnership with UpScript, LLC, an independent third-party telemedicine provider, that accommodates EsoGuard self-referrals from direct-to-consumer marketing.

Reimbursement and Market Access

A final Local Coverage Determination (“LCD”) L39256, entitled “Molecular Testing for Detection of Upper Gastrointestinal Metaplasia, Dysplasia, and Neoplasia” became effective in May 2023 on the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) website by MAC Palmetto GBA. (A substantially identical LCD was published by Noridian Healthcare Solutions, the MAC whose geographic jurisdiction covers our CLIA laboratory in Lake Forest, CA.) The LCD outlines criteria for future coverage that MolDX expects upper gastrointestinal precancer and cancer molecular diagnostic tests to meet. These criteria include active GERD with at least three risk factors, as well as evidence of analytic validity, clinical validity, and clinical utility. Although the LCD indicated that it found that no currently existing test has fulfilled all these criteria, it indicated that it will “monitor the evidence and may revise this determination based on the pertinent literature and society recommendations.” In November 2024, we submitted to MolDx our complete clinical evidence package in support of a request for reconsideration of the non-coverage language in the LCD to secure Medicare coverage for EsoGuard. The package was submitted as part of a request for reconsideration of the non-coverage language in the LCD to secure Medicare coverage for EsoGuard.

As part of the LCD reconsideration process, MolDx-participating Medicare Administrative Contractors convened a Contractor Advisory Committee ("CAC") Meeting regarding the LCD on September 4, 2025. At the meeting, eleven experts, including physicians across multiple specialties (GI, primary care, pathology), major society guideline co-authors (ACG, AGA) and industry leaders (American Foregut Society, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy), participated in this extensive discussion of the unmet clinical need with respect to early detection of esophageal precancer and the strength of the EsoGuard clinical validity and clinical utility data.

In parallel with our request for reconsideration of the LCD, we are aggressively pursuing EsoGuard commercial insurer coverage and payment. Although the claim adjudication cycle can be prolonged during the early commercialization of a new test, we have received and are continuing to receive out-of-network commercial insurance payments for the EsoGuard test, which accounts for the vast majority of our revenue to date. Through these efforts, Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield, an independent licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, has issued a positive coverage policy for non-invasive screening of esophageal precancer and cancer in New York state.

In addition, in January 2026, Lucid announced that it has been awarded a contract by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs for EsoGuard, expanding access to esophageal precancer testing across the nation's largest integrated healthcare system, which serves more than nine million enrolled veterans annually. The contract is issued under the VA Federal Supply Schedule and includes pre-negotiated pricing for EsoGuard that matches the established Medicare payment rate determined by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), enabling VA hospitals and healthcare facilities nationwide to access EsoGuard through a single, national VA procurement framework.

Additionally, the legislatures in a number of states have passed laws mandating coverage of comprehensive biomarker testing over the past several years. We are reviewing how to leverage legislation in those states to expand access to and reimbursement of EsoGuard.

3

Clinical Utility and Clinical Trials

We continue to expand the EsoGuard and EsoCheck evidence portfolio with ongoing emphasis on demonstration of clinical utility to support medical policy and payer coverage. These efforts include a large, nearly 12,000 patient real-world experience of EsoCheck and EsoGuard from 18 months of commercial data that is under journal review and expected to be published within the first half of the year. Additionally, data accrual from the PREVENT and PREVENT-FF registries remains ongoing and has been expanded to collect additional longitudinal follow-up data. Both registries capture information on the diagnostic and/or therapeutic journey of subjects following EsoGuard testing, including provider decision impact, patient compliance, and clinical outcomes data for the Lucid evidence portfolio.

Regulatory

In June 2019, we received FDA 510(k) clearance to market EsoCheck in the U.S. as a device indicated for use in the collection and retrieval of surface cells of the esophagus in adults followed by FDA 510(k) clearance in 2022, expanding the use of EsoCheck in adults and pediatric populations in the U.S. In December 2019, our CLIA-certified then-laboratory partner, completed documentation of EsoGuard analytical validity allowing us to commercialize it as a LDT.

In February 2020, we received FDA “Breakthrough Device Designation” for EsoGuard as an in-vitro diagnostic (“IVD”) medical device. The FDA Breakthrough Device Program was created to offer patients more timely access to breakthrough technologies which provide for more effective treatment or diagnosis of life-threatening or irreversibly debilitating human disease or conditions by expediting their development, assessment and review through enhanced communications and more efficient and flexible clinical study design, including more favorable pre/post market data collection balance.

In May 2021, we received CE Mark certification for EsoCheck (under the Medical Devices Directive 93/42/EEC), and in June 2021, we completed CE Mark self-certification for EsoGuard (under the European In-Vitro Diagnostic Devices Directive (IVDD 98/79/EC)), indicating both may be marketed in CE Mark European countries.

Our longer-term strategy is to secure a specific indication, based on published guidelines, for BE testing in certain at-risk populations using EsoGuard on samples collected with EsoCheck. This use of EsoGuard together with EsoCheck as a testing system must be cleared or approved by the FDA as an IVD device.

4

Competition

The U.S. market for EAC and pre-cancer (i.e., BE, with or without dysplasia) testing is large, consisting of more than 30 million at-risk individuals over the age of 50. Given the large market for pre-cancer testing, we likely will face numerous competitors, some of which possess significantly greater financial and other resources and development capabilities than us. Our EsoGuard test faces competition from procedure-based detection technologies such as upper endoscopy, and other testing technologies such as assays that incorporate biomarker multi-cancer early detection products. Our EsoCheck device faces competition from other manufacturers with devices designed to collect cell samples from targeted regions of the esophagus. For example, EndoSign, commercialized by Cyted, and much like Cytosponge, is a small mesh sponge within a soluble gelatin capsule that needs to reside in the stomach for some time until it fully dissolves and then is pulled thru the targeted region brushing the lining of the esophagus and then later retrieved, although, unlike EsoCheck, it is unprotected from sample contamination as the brush later passes regions of the upper esophagus and mouth. Our competitors may also be developing additional methods of detecting esophageal cancer and pre-cancer that have not yet been announced.

We will also compete in the marketplace to recruit and retain qualified scientific, management and sales personnel, as well as in acquiring technologies and licenses complementary to our products or advantageous to our business. We are aware of several companies that compete or are developing technologies in our current and future products areas. In order to compete effectively, our products will have to achieve market acceptance, receive adequate insurance coverage and reimbursement, be cost effective and be simultaneously safe and effective.

Veris Health

Overview

Veris Health is a majority-owned digital health subsidiary focused on improving personalized cancer care during treatment and throughout survivorship by helping oncology teams maintain greater visibility into patient health between visits. Through integrated digital tools, Veris enables oncology teams to remain connected with patients and monitor changes in their condition between visits, supporting earlier identification of emerging issues and more informed clinical decision-making.

Veris Health’s lead product, the Veris Cancer Care Platform, is a comprehensive digital cancer care platform designed to support personalized cancer care during treatment and throughout survivorship by enabling continuous monitoring of patient health between visits. The platform includes remote physiological data collection, symptom reporting, telehealth capability and electronic health record (“EHR”) integration. The platform offers enhanced personalized cancer care through the early detection of complications, reduced unplanned hospitalizations, the provision of longitudinal trends of physiological and clinical data, data-driven risk management tools, and increased patient and provider satisfaction. Cancer patients enrolled on the platform receive a VerisBox™ of Veris-branded connected health care devices which transmit physiologic data to the cloud-based clinician portal via embedded cellular connections. A complementary patient portal enables patients to report symptoms, as well as general health and quality of life parameters, to their cancer care team through the Veris patient smartphone app. The app also allows caretakers and family members to follow along on the patient’s cancer care journey.

Veris is also developing an implantable physiological monitor, designed to be implanted alongside a vascular access port, which will interface with the Veris Cancer Care Platform. The implantable monitor is intended to further enhance the clinical and commercial value of the platform by providing remote physiologic data independent of patient compliance.

5

Market Opportunity

In 2024, approximately 2 million people in the U.S. were newly diagnosed with cancer, and cancer incidence in the U.S. is expected to continue to increase. Cancer patients face high rates of complications during the courses of their treatment which drive poor patient outcomes and healthcare costs. One driver of these issues is avoidable hospitalizations. We believe Veris Health’s offerings can help drive costs down and improve outcomes through providing care teams with better, more continuous data.

Based on the aforementioned cancer prevalence in the U.S. and our current business model, we believe Veris Health’s total addressable U.S. market opportunity exceeds $2 billion. In the future, we believe this will only expand through the implantable physiological monitor, as well as other opportunities or enhancements Veris may pursue as resources permit, such as data commercialization, incorporating additional AI-based features and the expansion into other markets aside from oncology.

Commercialization/Sales

We are currently pursuing strategic partnerships with leading academic oncology systems, whereby we would become the exclusive digital health solution for these institutions’ oncology departments. To this end, in October 2025, we announced that Veris and The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute ("OSUCCC – The James"), a National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center, launched the commercial phase of their long-term strategic partnership agreement. This transition to a commercial phase follows successful completion of a pilot program conducted at the OSUCCC -- The James.

Veris is continuing to pursue similar partnerships with other leading institutions. Veris has a software-as-a-service recurring-revenue business model, where it seeks to generate recurring revenue through oncology practice and hospital-based subscriptions. These entities pay monthly fees for each patient on the platform, through which they are able to derive revenues from remote physiologic monitoring (and, in the future, device implantation) under existing CPT codes. We have identified multiple potential use cases across a number of verticals, including clinical trials, commercial use cases, and as a means to improve patient care.

Manufacturing

The components comprising the VerisBox™ kit are currently supplied to us by a third part manufacturer. The final packaging of the overall box and order fulfillment is managed by PAVmed at its Foxborough, MA location. Customer support is currently managed internally, while partnering with Salesforce for customer service management.

Regulatory

The Veris Cancer Care Platform qualifies as a Non-Device Clinical Decision Software (“CDS”) that is excluded from the definition of a medical device under the FDCA, as amended by the 21st Century Cures Act, and therefore is not subject to the FDA’s regulatory requirements for devices, as confirmed in the FDA’s Clinical Decision Support Software Guidance.

Veris Health is also developing an implantable physiological monitor and completed multiple interactions with the FDA via pre-submission process, seeking agreement on regulatory strategy and required testing to seek clearance of the monitor. We plan to make our 510(k) submission for the implantable monitor, which could happen as early as late 2026, if and to the extent resources permit us to do so.

Competition

The U.S. market for cancer patient care is large. There are many existing competitors in the remote physiological monitoring space, some of which possess significantly greater financial and other resources and development capabilities than us. Our Veris Cancer Care Platform faces competition from other digital care platforms providing many of the same features, including EHR integration and remote patient monitoring capabilities. While we are not aware of other implantable physiologic monitors containing biologic sensors, our competitors may also be developing similar devices that have not yet been announced.

6

Medical Device Pipeline

PAVmed is developing a portfolio of medical device technologies. This portfolio currently includes the Company’s PortIO implantable intraosseous vascular access device and endoscopic imaging technology licensed from Duke University. The Company continues to evaluate opportunities to expand its medical device portfolio through internal development and external licensing.

PortIO

Our PortIO implantable intraosseous vascular access device is being developed as a means for infusing fluids, medications and other substances directly into the bone marrow cavity and from there into the central venous circulation. The intraosseous route provides a means for infusing fluids, medications and other substances directly into the bone marrow cavity, which communicates with the central venous circulation via nutrient and emissary veins. This route is well established and has been used for decades in a variety of clinical settings, including trauma and pediatric emergencies, and has been shown to be bioequivalent to the intravenous route.

Currently available intraosseous devices pass through the skin into the bone and are therefore limited to short-term use. PortIO is a novel, implantable intraosseous vascular access device that does not require accessing the central venous system and does not have an indwelling intravascular component. It is designed to be highly resistant to occlusion and may not require regular flushing. It also features simplified, near-percutaneous insertion and removal, without the need for surgical dissection or radiographic confirmation.

Endoscopic Imaging Technology

In February 2026, PAVmed entered into a definitive license agreement with Duke University, through a newly formed subsidiary, for the exclusive worldwide rights to endoscopic imaging technology involving a multi-modality probe combining angle-resolved low coherence interferometry (“a/LCI”) with optical coherence tomography (“OCT”).

This technology may be used to identify and facilitate treatment of advanced esophageal precancer (“dysplasia”) during upper endoscopy. The platform is designed to integrate with standard endoscopic procedures and may enable real-time assessment of esophageal tissue to guide clinical decision-making during the procedure.

Additionally, as the diagnosis of dysplasia currently relies on biopsy-based approaches, which require tissue sampling and subsequent pathological review, this technology may provide a complementary approach to streamline the evaluation and treatment process.

7

Recent Events

Business

Medicare Coverage (Lucid)

In November 2024, Lucid submitted to MolDx its complete clinical evidence package in support of a request for reconsideration of the non-coverage language in the LCD to secure Medicare coverage for EsoGuard. The EsoGuard clinical evidence package included six new peer-reviewed publications: three clinical validation studies (two in the intended use population, one case control), two clinical utility studies, and one analytical validation study. The current LCD provides clear coverage criteria consistent with the ACG guidelines for esophageal precancer testing. The package was submitted as part of a request for reconsideration of the non-coverage language in the LCD to secure Medicare coverage for EsoGuard.

As part of the LCD reconsideration process, MolDx-participating Medicare Administrative Contractors convened a CAC Meeting regarding the LCD on September 4, 2025. At the meeting, eleven experts, including physicians across multiple specialties (GI, primary care, pathology), major society guideline co-authors (ACG, AGA) and industry leaders (American Foregut Society, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy), participated in this extensive discussion of the unmet clinical need with respect to early detection of esophageal precancer and the strength of the EsoGuard clinical validity and clinical utility data.

Medical Device Developments

In March 2026, PAVmed hired industry-veteran Joseph Virgilio to serve as PAVmed's Chief Business Officer for Medical Devices. Prior to joining PAVmed, Mr. Virgilio held leadership roles at a diverse group of medical device companies over the course of his 25-year career.

In this capacity, Mr. Virgilio will oversee the development and commercialization of PAVmed's current and future medical device portfolio. Such portfolio includes at this time the Company's PortIO implantable intraosseous vascular access device, which is being developed as a means for infusing fluids, medications and other substances directly into the bone marrow cavity and from there into the central venous circulation. The portfolio also includes technology licensed by PAVmed from Duke University that involves a multi-modality probe combining ("a/LCI") with optical coherence tomography ("OCT"), as more fully described below.

Endoscopic Imaging Technology

In February 2026, PAVmed entered into a definitive license agreement with Duke University, through a newly formed subsidiary, for the exclusive worldwide rights to technology involving a multi-modality probe combining angle-resolved low coherence interferometry (“a/LCI”) with endoscopic imaging. This technology may be used to identify and facilitate treatment of advanced esophageal precancer (“dysplasia”) during upper endoscopy. The platform is designed to integrate with standard endoscopic procedures and may enable real-time assessment of esophageal tissue to guide clinical decision-making during the procedure. Additionally, as the diagnosis of dysplasia currently relies on biopsy-based approaches, which require tissue sampling and subsequent pathological review, this technology may provide a complementary approach to streamline the evaluation and treatment process.

Department of Veteran Affairs (Lucid)

In January 2026, Lucid announced that it has been awarded a contract by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs for EsoGuard expanding access to esophageal precancer testing across the nation's largest integrated healthcare system, which serves more than nine million enrolled veterans annually. The contract is issued under the VA Federal Supply Schedule and includes pre-negotiated pricing for EsoGuard that matches the established Medicare payment rate determined by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), enabling VA hospitals and healthcare facilities nationwide to access EsoGuard through a single, national VA procurement framework.

Real-World Experience Data (Lucid)

In December 2025, Lucid announced results from an 18-month real-world experience evaluating EsoGuard and EsoCheck in approximately 12,000 patients. The analysis demonstrated high technical success rates, rapid procedure times, and appropriate physician utilization in routine clinical practice, consistent with previously reported clinical studies. The data are currently under peer review for publication.

Strategic Commercial Partnership (Veris)

In October 2025, we announced that Veris and The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute ("OSUCCC – The James"), a National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center, launched the commercial phase of their long-term strategic partnership agreement. This transition to a commercial phase follows successful completion of a pilot program conducted at the OSUCCC -- The James.

Clinical Study Publications (Lucid)

In September 2025, a case series published in Gastroenterology & Hepatology highlighted four real-world cases in which EsoGuard facilitated the timely detection of either high-grade dysplasia ("HGD") or intramucosal carcinoma ("IMC"; T1a esophageal adenocarcinoma). In all four cases, the patients had no prior history of EGD, including one individual who had previously declined multiple EGD referrals. Following positive in-office EsoGuard results, each patient proceeded with endoscopic evaluation, which led to successful identification and eradication of disease in all cases. This case series underscores both the clinical utility of EsoGuard in detecting early-stage neoplasia and the ease with which the test can be integrated into standard office workflows to enhance screening uptake and early disease detection.

Russell 2000® and 3000® Indexes (Lucid)

On June 27, 2025, Lucid was added to the Russell 2000® Index and the Russell 3000® Index, following the 2025 annual reconstitution by FTSE Russell.

NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines Update (Lucid)

In March 2025, Lucid announced that a recent update to the NCCN Guidelines® focused on Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers (Version 1.2025) has added a new section on BE screening. The NCCN Guidelines® now reference professional society guidelines on BE screening, including the most recent ACG clinical guideline discussed above, which recommends non-endoscopic biomarker testing, such as EsoGuard performed on samples collected with EsoCheck, as an acceptable alternative to invasive upper endoscopy to detect esophageal precancer.

8

Highmark Reimbursement Approval (Lucid)

On March 13, 2025, Lucid announced that Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield, an independent licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, has issued a positive coverage policy for non-invasive screening of esophageal precancer and cancer in New York state.

Financing

Series D Offering and Recapitalization; Series D Conversion

On February 3, 2026, PAVmed entered into subscription agreements (the “Subscription Agreements”) with certain accredited investors (the “Investors”) and, pursuant to and concurrently with the execution of the Subscription Agreements, sold to the Investors, for an aggregate purchase price of $30 million, (i) 30,000 shares of the Company’s newly designated Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Series D Preferred Stock”), and (ii) warrants (the “Warrant”) to purchase an additional 30,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock, with each investor receiving 100 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and a warrant to purchase 100 shares of Series D Preferred Stock for each $100,000 of its investment (the “Offering”). The initial conversion price of the Series D Preferred Stock is $6.50 per share, subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends, and similar transactions.

Concurrently with the Offering, the Company redeemed all 16,962 shares of Series C Preferred Stock outstanding and refinanced all $8.4 million in principal and interest of its Senior Secured Convertible Note issued in September (the “2022 Note”), in consideration of a cash payment to the holder thereof (the “Holder”) of approximately $22.3 million (which was made using proceeds from the sale of the Series D Preferred Stock), and the issuance to the Holder of an amended and restated 2022 Note (the “2026 Note”) with a principal amount of $15.0 million.

The net proceeds of the Offering, taking into account the cash payments made in respect of the redemption of the Series C Preferred Stock and the 2022 Note, were approximately $7.6 million.

On March 27, 2026, PAVmed's shareholders approved the conversion of the Series D Preferred Stock into shares of our common stock. Promptly following such approval, 100% of the Series D Preferred Stock was converted in full into 4,615,393 shares of our common stock.

Reverse Stock Split; Reduction in Authorized Shares

At a special meeting of the Company’s stockholders held on December 5, 2025, the Company’s stockholders approved a reverse stock split of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock (the “Reverse Split”) at a specific ratio, ranging from 1-for-10 to 1-for-30, to be determined by the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) in its sole discretion, as well as an associated reduction in the number of shares of common stock the Company is authorized to issue (the “Reduction in Authorized Common Stock”) from 250,000,000 shares to 25,000,000 shares.

Following the special meeting, the Board approved a ratio of 1-for-30 for the Reverse Split. On December 30, 2025, in order to effect the Reverse Split and the Reduction in Authorized Common Stock, the Company filed a certificate of amendment to its certificate of incorporation, as amended, pursuant to which the Reverse Split and the Reduction in Authorized Common Stock became effective on Friday, January 2, 2026.

The purpose of the Reverse Split was to help the Company regain compliance with the $1 minimum bid requirement for continued listing on the Capital Market of the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC ("Nasdaq"), which it did, as discussed below. All shares and per share amounts set forth herein give effect to the reverse stock split.

9

NASDAQ Compliance

On January 21, 2026, the Company received a notification letter from the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications department stating that the Company had regained compliance with the $1 minimum bid price requirement for continued listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market.

As previously reported, on January 23, 2025, the Company had received a notification letter from the Listing Qualifications department stating that, for the prior 30 consecutive business days (through January 22, 2025), the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock had been below the minimum of $1 per share required for continued listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2). Subsequently, Nasdaq determined that, from January 2, 2026 to January 19, 2026, the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock had been at $1 per share or greater. Accordingly, the Company had regained compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2).

Veris Financing (June 2025)

On June 23, 2025, Veris entered into subscription agreements (each, a “Veris June 2025 Subscription Agreement”) with certain accredited investors (collectively, the “June 2025 Investors”), pursuant to which Veris agreed to sell and the June 2025 Investors agreed to purchase (the “June 2025 Offering”) 1,800,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Veris (“Veris Common Stock”) and warrants to purchase 1,800,000 shares of Veris Common Stock (“Veris Warrants”), at a purchase price of $1.40 per share of Veris Common Stock. On the same day, Veris consummated the June 2025 Offering, generating gross proceeds to Veris of approximately $2.5 million. The proceeds of the offering will be used to continue development activities related to Veris’ implantable physiological monitor and for general working capital purposes.

The Veris Warrants become exercisable six months after issuance and expire on the earlier of (i) the five-year anniversary of the initial exercise date and (ii) the 60th day following receipt by Veris of FDA approval of its implantable physiological monitor. The Veris Warrants have an exercise price of $1.40 per share, subject to adjustment under certain circumstances.

PAVmed/Veris Financing (February 2025)

On February 18, 2025, the Company and Veris, entered into subscription agreements (each, a “Subscription Agreement”) with certain accredited investors (collectively, the “Investors”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell and the Investors agreed to purchase (the “Offering”) 85,812 shares of the Company’s common stock and pre-funded warrants to purchase 25,225 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Pre-Funded Warrants”), at a purchase price of $21.345 per share or warrant share (as applicable). In addition, Veris agreed to issue to each Investor approximately 6.098 shares of Veris Common Stock for each share or warrant share (as applicable) purchased by such Investor, for an aggregate of 677,143 shares of Veris Common Stock. On February 21, 2025, the Company consummated the Offering, generating gross proceeds to the Company of $2.37 million. The proceeds of the offering will be used to resume development activities related to Veris’ implantable physiological monitor and for general working capital purposes.

The Pre-Funded Warrants were exercised as of June 19, 2025.

10

PAVmed ATM

On April 17, 2025, the Company entered into a Sales Agreement (the “Sales Agreement”) with Maxim Group LLC, as sales agent (“Maxim”), pursuant to which the Company may offer and sell, from time to time through or to Maxim, shares of its common stock. Under the Sales Agreement, the Company may not issue or sell through Maxim a dollar amount of shares that would exceed $2.88 million of shares. The Company will pay Maxim a commission of 3.0% of the aggregate gross sales prices of the shares. The Company intends to use the net proceeds from any such sales for working capital and general corporate purposes.

This facility replaced the “at the market” facility PAVmed previously maintained with Cantor (which facility was on substantially similar terms).

Lucid Diagnostics — Confidentially Marketed Public Offering (September 2025)

On September 11, 2025, Lucid closed on the sale of 28,750,000 shares of its common stock, pursuant to its previously announced offering of shares of common stock at a price of $1.00 per share (the “Lucid September CMPO”). The net proceeds from the Lucid September CMPO, after deducting the underwriting discount and other expenses of the Lucid September CMPO, were approximately $27.0 million. Lucid is using the net proceeds from the Lucid September CMPO for working capital and general corporate purposes.

Lucid ATM Facility

On May 30, 2025, Lucid entered into a Controlled Equity Offering Agreement (also “ATM” or “at-the-market” offering) between Lucid and Maxim Group LLC for up to $25 million of its common stock that may be offered and sold from time to time. Subsequent to December 31, 2025 as of March 27, 2026, Lucid sold 4,161,747 shares through its at-the-market equity facility for net proceeds of approximately $5.3 million, after payment of 3% commissions.

11

Intellectual Property

Our business will depend on proprietary medical device and diagnostic technologies to commercialize. We own or have the right to use intellectual property rights, such as patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets and know-how, pertaining to our EsoCheck and EsoGuard technology, our Veris technology and PortIO, among other technologies and products.

We intend to vigorously protect our proprietary technologies’ intellectual property rights in patents, trademarks and copyrights, as available through registration in the United States and internationally. Patent protection and other proprietary rights are thus essential to our business. Each of our technologies is protected by multiple patent families. For select technologies shown below, patents have been granted with protection extending to at least the date shown below (although currently pending patent applications, both foreign and domestic, provide protection beyond such date in each instance).

Technology

Year

EsoCheck

May 2034

EsoGuard

August 2024

Veris Health

November 2038

EsoCure

March 2036

CarpX

November 2037

PortIO

November 2035

Our policy is to aggressively file patent applications to protect our proprietary technologies including inventions and improvements to inventions. We seek patent protection, as appropriate, on:

●

the product itself including all embodiments with future commercial potential;

●

the methods of using the product; and

●

the methods of manufacturing the product.

In addition to filing and prosecuting patent applications in the United States, we intend to file counterpart patent applications in other countries worldwide where there is a value in doing so. Foreign filings can be cumbersome and expensive, and we will pursue such filings when we believe they are warranted as we try to balance our international commercialization plans with our desire to protect the global value of the technology.

The term of individual patents depends upon the legal term of the patents in the countries in which they are obtained. In most countries in which we file, the patent term is 20 years from the earliest date of filing a non-provisional patent application. In the United States, a patent’s term may be shortened if a patent is terminally disclaimed over another patent or as a result of delays in patent prosecution by the patentee, and a patent’s term may be lengthened by patent term adjustment (PTA), which compensates a patentee for administrative delays by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) in granting a patent, or patent term extension, which restores time lost due to regulatory delays.

We intend to continuously reassess and fine-tune our intellectual property strategy in order to fortify our position in the United States and internationally. Prior to acquiring or licensing a technology from a third party, we will evaluate the existing proprietary rights, our ability to adequately obtain and protect these rights and the likelihood or possibility of infringement upon competing rights of others.

12

We also rely upon trade secrets, know-how, continuing technological innovation, and upon licensing opportunities, to develop and maintain our competitive position. We intend to protect our proprietary rights through a variety of methods, including confidentiality agreements and/or proprietary information agreements with suppliers, employees, consultants, independent contractors and other entities who may have access to proprietary information. We will generally require employees to assign patents and other intellectual property to us as a condition of employment with us. All of our consulting agreements will pre-emptively assign to us all new and improved intellectual property that arise during the term of the agreement.

PAVmed also has (directly or through its subsidiaries) proprietary rights to a range of trademarks, including, among others, PAVmed™, Lucid Diagnostics™, LUCID™, VERIS™, EsoCheck®, EsoGuard®, EsoCheck Cell Collection Device®, Collect + Protect®, and PortIO™. (Solely as a matter of convenience, trademarks and trade names referred to herein may or may not be accompanied with the requisite marks of “™” or “®”. However, the absence of such marks is not intended to indicate, in any way, PAVmed Inc. or its subsidiaries will not assert, to the fullest extent possible under applicable law, their respective rights to such trademarks and trade names.)

Health Insurance Coverage and Reimbursement

Our ability to successfully commercialize our products will depend in part on the extent to which governmental authorities, private health insurers and other third-party payors provide coverage for and establish adequate reimbursement levels for the procedures during which our products are used.

In the United States, third-party payors continue to implement initiatives that restrict the use of certain technologies to those that meet certain clinical evidentiary requirements. In addition to uncertainties surrounding coverage policies, there are periodic changes to reimbursement. Third-party payors regularly update reimbursement amounts and also from time to time revise the methodologies used to determine reimbursement amounts. This includes annual updates to payments to physicians, hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers for procedures during which our products are used. An example of payment updates is the Medicare program’s updates to hospital and physician payments, which are done on an annual basis using a prescribed statutory formula. In the past, when the application of the formula resulted in lower payment, Congress has passed interim legislation to prevent the reductions.

A product’s reimbursement profile, both in the U.S. and internationally, is an important component of the product’s commercial opportunity. We prefer projects with existing reimbursement codes, the opportunity to seek reimbursement under higher-value surgical procedure codes or the potential to seek reimbursement under narrow, product-specific codes as opposed to bundled procedure codes. For those products that have high strategic value, but with less defined reimbursement, we have engaged reimbursement experts and support from industry associations to accelerate the acquisition of satisfactory reimbursement levels.

13

Competition for New Medical Device Innovation

Developing and commercializing new products is highly competitive. The market is characterized by extensive research and clinical efforts and rapid technological change. We face intense competition worldwide from medical device, biomedical technology and medical products and combination products companies, including major medical products companies. We may be unable to respond to technological advances through the development and introduction of new products. Most of our existing and potential competitors have substantially greater financial, marketing, sales, distribution, manufacturing and technological resources. These competitors may also be in the process of seeking FDA or other regulatory approvals, or patent protection, for new products. Our competitors may commercialize new products in advance of our products. Our products also face competition from numerous existing products and procedures, some of which currently are considered part of the standard of care. We believe the principal competitive factors in our markets are:

●

the quality of outcomes for medical conditions;

●

acceptance by surgeons and the medical device market generally;

●

ease of use and reliability;

●

technical leadership and superiority;

●

effective marketing and distribution;

●

speed to market; and

●

product price and qualification for coverage and reimbursement.

We will also compete in the marketplace to recruit and retain qualified scientific, management and sales personnel, as well as in acquiring technologies and licenses complementary to our products or advantageous to our business. We are aware of several companies that compete or are developing technologies in our current and future products areas. In order to compete effectively, our products will have to achieve market acceptance, receive adequate insurance coverage and reimbursement, be cost effective and be simultaneously safe and effective.

14

Government Regulation

Key U.S. Regulation

FDA Regulation

Before and after approval or clearance in the United States, our products are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA under the FDCA and/or the Public Health Service Act, as well as by other regulatory bodies. FDA regulations govern, among other things, the development, testing, manufacturing, labeling, safety, storage, recordkeeping, market clearance or approval, advertising and promotion, import and export, marketing and sales, and distribution of medical devices and products.

In the United States, medical devices are subject to varying degrees of regulatory control and are classified in one of three classes depending on the extent of controls the FDA determines are necessary to reasonably ensure their safety and efficacy:

●

Class I: general controls, such as labeling and adherence to quality system regulations;

●

Class II: special controls, pre-market notification (often referred to as a 510(k) application), specific controls such as performance standards, patient registries, post-market surveillance, additional controls such as labeling and adherence to quality system regulations; and

●

Class III: special controls and approval of a de novo request or PMA application, likely with clinical data requirements.

In general, the higher the classification, the greater the time and cost to obtain approval to market. There are no “standardized” requirements for approval, even within each class. For example, FDA could grant 510(k) status, but require a human clinical trial, a typical requirement of a PMA. They could also initially assign a device Class III status but end up clearing a device as a 510(k) device or under a de novo classification pathway if certain requirements are met. The range of the number and expense of the various requirements is significant. The quickest and least expensive pathway would be 510(k) clearance with a review of existing bench and animal data. A de novo classification pathway would have a similar cost to seeking 510(k) clearance, but with a slightly longer review timeline. The longest and most expensive path would be a PMA with extensive randomized human clinical trials. We cannot predict fully how FDA will classify our products, nor predict what requirements will be placed upon us to obtain market clearance or approve our products at all.

To request marketing authorization by means of a 510(k) clearance, we must submit a pre-market notification demonstrating the proposed device is substantially equivalent to another currently legally marketed medical device, has the same intended use, and is as safe and effective as a currently legally marketed device and does not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness than does a currently legally marketed device. 510(k) submissions generally include, among other things, a description of the device and its manufacturing, device labeling, medical devices to which the device is substantially equivalent, safety and biocompatibility information, and the results of performance testing. In some cases, a 510(k) submission must include data from human clinical studies. Marketing may commence only when the FDA issues a clearance letter finding substantial equivalence. After a device receives 510(k) clearance, any product modification that could significantly affect the safety or effectiveness of the product, or would constitute a significant change in intended use, requires a new 510(k) clearance or, if the device would no longer be substantially equivalent, would require PMA, or possibly, a de novo pathway under section 513(f)(2) of the FDCA. In addition, any additional claims the Company wished to make at a later date may require a PMA. If the FDA determines the product does not qualify for 510(k) clearance, they will issue a Not Substantially Equivalent (“NSE”) letter, at which point the Company must submit and the FDA must approve a PMA or issue premarket clearance using the de novo before marketing can begin.

In 1997, the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act (“FDAMA”) added the de novo classification pathway under section 513(f)(2) of the FDCA, establishing an alternate pathway to classify new devices into Class I or II that had automatically been placed in Class III after receiving an NSE determination in response to a 510(k) submission. In this process, a sponsor who receives an NSE determination may, within 30 days of receiving notice of the NSE determination, request FDA to make a risk-based classification of the device under section 513(a)(1) of the Act.

15

In 2012, section 513(f)(2) of the FDCA was amended by section 607 of the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (“FDASIA”), to provide a second option for de novo classification. In this second pathway, a sponsor who determines there is no legally marketed device upon which to base a determination of substantial equivalence may request FDA to make a risk-based classification of the device under section 513(a)(1) of the Act without first submitting a 510(k).

During the review of a 510(k) submission, the FDA may request more information or additional studies and may decide the indications for which we seek approval or clearance should be limited. In addition, laws and regulations and the interpretation of those laws and regulations by the FDA may change in the future. We cannot foresee what effect, if any, such changes may have on us.

Clinical Trials of Medical Technology

One or more clinical trials may be necessary to support an FDA submission. Clinical studies of unapproved or uncleared medical devices or devices being studied for uses for which they are not approved or cleared (investigational devices) must be conducted in compliance with FDA requirements. If an investigational device could pose a significant risk to patients, the sponsor company must submit an Investigational Device Exemption (“IDE”) application to the FDA prior to initiation of the clinical study. An IDE application must be supported by appropriate data, such as animal and laboratory test results, showing it is safe to test the device on humans and the testing protocol is scientifically sound. The IDE will automatically become effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA unless the FDA notifies the company the investigation may not begin. Clinical studies of investigational devices may not begin until an institutional review board (“IRB”) has approved the study.

During any study, the sponsor must comply with the FDA’s IDE requirements. These requirements include investigator selection, trial monitoring, adverse event reporting, and record keeping. The investigators must obtain patient informed consent, rigorously follow the investigational plan and study protocol, control the disposition of investigational devices, and comply with reporting and record keeping requirements. We, the FDA, or the IRB at each institution at which a clinical trial is being conducted may suspend a clinical trial at any time for various reasons, including a belief the subjects are being exposed to an unacceptable risk. During the approval or clearance process, the FDA typically inspects the records relating to the conduct of one or more investigational sites participating in the study supporting the application.

Post-Approval Regulation of Medical Devices and Diagnostic Tests

After a device is cleared or approved for marketing, numerous regulatory requirements continue to apply. These include:

●

the FDA Quality Systems Regulation (QSR), which governs, among other things, how manufacturers design, test manufacture, exercise quality control over, and document manufacturing of their products;

●

labeling and claims regulations, which prohibit the promotion of products for unapproved or “off-label” uses and impose other restrictions on labeling; and,

●

the Medical Device Reporting regulation, which requires reporting to FDA of certain adverse experience associated with use of the product.

We will continue to be subject to inspection by FDA to determine our compliance with regulatory requirements.

Manufacturing cGMP Requirements

Manufacturers of medical devices are required to comply with FDA manufacturing requirements contained in the FDA’s current Good Manufacturing Practices (“cGMP”) set forth in the quality system regulations promulgated under section 520 of the FDCA. cGMP regulations require, among other things, quality control and quality assurance as well as the corresponding maintenance of records and documentation. Failure to comply with statutory and regulatory requirements subjects a manufacturer to possible legal or regulatory action, including the seizure or recall of products, injunctions, consent decrees placing significant restrictions on or suspending manufacturing operations, and civil and criminal penalties. Adverse experiences with the product must be reported to the FDA and could result in the imposition of marketing restrictions through labeling changes or in product withdrawal. Product approvals may be withdrawn if compliance with regulatory requirements is not maintained or if problems concerning safety or efficacy of the product occur following the approval. We expect to use contract manufacturers to manufacture our products for the foreseeable future we will therefore be dependent on their compliance with these requirements to market our products. We work closely with our contract manufacturers to assure our products are in strict compliance with these regulations.

16

Laboratory Certification, Accreditation and Licensing

Lucid's CLIA-certified laboratory is subject to U.S. federal and state laws and regulations governing the operation of clinical laboratories. CLIA requirements establish certification requirements and standards relating to quality systems, quality control, personnel qualifications, and operational requirements. We are accredited by the College of American Pathologists ("CAP"), a CMS approved accrediting organization under CLIA’s authority. As a CAP accredited laboratory, Lucid is subject to periodic inspections conducted by CAP and, in certain circumstances, by CMS. CAP accreditation is designed to meet or exceed CLIA requirements; however, failure to maintain CAP accreditation could result in loss of our ability to operate under CLIA.

In addition to CLIA, certain states, including California, New York, Maryland, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Rhode Island and Florida, impose separate certification and/or licensure requirements for clinical laboratories operating within or offering testing services to patients in those states. CLIA allows states to adopt laboratory regulations that are equal to or more stringent than federal requirements, and allows states to apply for exemption from CLIA oversight if CMS determines that the state’s requirements are at least as stringent as or more stringent than, CLIA. For example, the State of New York’s clinical laboratory regulations received such an exemption, and in certain respects, imposes requirements more stringent than those under federal CLIA standards. Accordingly, to the extent Lucid offers testing services in New York or for New York patients, it must comply with these applicable New York State Department of Health requirements.

Lucid currently holds the certificates, licenses, and accreditations required to perform its clinical laboratory testing. Clinical laboratories are subject to periodic inspection by federal and state regulators and accrediting bodies, and may be subject to sanctions for noncompliance. Sanctions available under CLIA and applicable state laws include suspending, limiting, or revoking certificates or licenses; prohibiting a laboratory from running tests; requiring a laboratory to implement a corrective action plan; imposing civil monetary penalties; and, in certain cases, exclusion from participation in federal healthcare programs. Failure to comply with applicable CLIA or state laboratory requirements could result in enforcement action, interruption of our laboratory operations, and increased cost. It could also adversely affect the commercialization of Lucid's products and services or future regulatory determinations by CMS or other governmental authorities.

Other U.S. Healthcare Regulation

In addition to FDA restrictions on marketing and promotion of drugs and devices, other federal and state laws restrict our business practices. These laws include, without limitation, anti-kickback and false claims laws, data privacy and security laws, as well as transparency laws regarding payments or other items of value provided to healthcare providers.

Because of the breadth of these laws and the narrowness of the statutory exceptions and safe harbors available under such laws, it is possible that some of our business activities, including certain sales and marketing practices and the provision of certain items and services to our customers, could be subject to challenge under one or more of such laws. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of the health regulatory laws described above or any other laws that apply to us, we may be subject to penalties, including potentially significant criminal and civil and administrative penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, imprisonment, exclusion from participation in government healthcare programs, contractual damages, reputational harm, administrative burdens, diminished profits and future earnings, and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, any of which could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our results of operations. To the extent that any of our products are sold in a foreign country, we may be subject to similar foreign laws, which may include, for instance, applicable post-marketing requirements, including safety surveillance, anti-fraud and abuse laws and implementation of corporate compliance programs and reporting of payments or transfers of value to healthcare professionals.

In any event, we have established a substantial regulatory and compliance infrastructure that is designed to ensure compliance with these regulations.

17

Physician Payment Sunshine Act

On February 8, 2013, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, released its final rule implementing section 6002 of the Affordable Care Act known as the Physician Payment Sunshine Act that imposes annual reporting requirements on device manufacturers for payments and other transfers of value provided by them, directly or indirectly, to physicians and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their family members. A manufacturer’s failure to submit timely, accurately and completely the required information for all payments, transfers of value or ownership or investment interests may result in civil monetary penalties of up to an aggregate of $150,000 per year, and up to an aggregate of $1 million per year for “knowing failures.” Manufacturers that produce at least one product reimbursed by Medicare, Medicaid, or Children’s Health Insurance Program and (i) if the product is a drug or biological, and it requires a prescription (or physician’s authorization) to administer; or (ii) if the product is a device or medical supply, and it requires premarket approval or premarket notification by the FDA are required to comply with the Open Payments (commonly referred to as the Sunshine Act) filing requirements under CMS.

Certain states, also mandate implementation of commercial compliance programs, and other states impose restrictions on device manufacturer marketing practices and require tracking and reporting of gifts, compensation and other remuneration to healthcare professionals and entities. The shifting commercial compliance environment and the need to build and maintain robust and expandable systems to comply with different compliance or reporting requirements in multiple jurisdictions increase the possibility a healthcare company may fail to comply fully with one or more of these requirements.

Federal Anti-Kickback Statute

The Federal Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully offering, paying, soliciting or receiving any remuneration (including any kickback, bribe or rebate), directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, to induce or in return for purchasing, leasing, ordering or arranging for or recommending the purchase, lease or order of any good, facility, item or service reimbursable, in whole or in part, under Medicare, Medicaid or other federal healthcare programs. The term “remuneration” has been broadly interpreted to include anything of value. Although there are a number of statutory exceptions and regulatory safe harbors protecting some common activities from prosecution, the exceptions and safe harbors are drawn narrowly. Practices that involve remuneration that may be alleged to be intended to induce prescribing, purchases or recommendations may be subject to scrutiny if they do not qualify for an exception or safe harbor. Failure to meet all of the requirements of a particular applicable statutory exception or regulatory safe harbor does not make the conduct per se illegal under the Anti-Kickback Statute. Instead, the legality of the arrangement will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis based on a cumulative review of all its facts and circumstances. Several courts have interpreted the statute’s intent requirement to mean that if any one purpose of an arrangement involving remuneration is to induce referrals of federal healthcare covered business, the Anti-Kickback Statute has been violated.

Additionally, the intent standard under the Anti-Kickback Statute was amended by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, collectively the Affordable Care Act, to a stricter standard such that a person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation. In addition, the Affordable Care Act codified case law that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the federal civil False Claims Act. We are subject to comparable state laws, including those pertaining to fee splitting, some of which apply to all payors regardless of source of payment, and do not contain identical safe harbors.

18

Federal False Claims Act

The False Claims Act prohibits, among other things, any person or entity from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval to the federal government or knowingly making, using or causing to be made or used a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim to the federal government. A claim includes “any request or demand” for money or property presented to the U.S. government. The False Claims Act also applies to false submissions that cause the government to be paid less than the amount to which it is entitled, such as a rebate. Intent to deceive is not required to establish liability under the False Claims Act. Several pharmaceutical, device and other healthcare companies have been prosecuted under these laws for, among other things, allegedly providing free product to customers with the expectation that the customers would bill federal programs for the product. Other companies have been prosecuted for causing false claims to be submitted because of the companies’ marketing of products for unapproved, and thus noncovered uses.

The government may further prosecute, as a crime, conduct constituting a false claim under the False Claims Act. The False Claims Act prohibits the making or presenting of a claim to the government knowing such claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent and, unlike civil claims under the False Claims Act, requires proof of intent to submit a false claim.

The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or the FCPA, prohibits any U.S. individual or business from paying, offering, or authorizing payment or offering of anything of value, directly or indirectly, to any foreign official, political party or candidate for the purpose of influencing any act or decision of the foreign entity in order to assist the individual or business in obtaining or retaining business. The FCPA also obligates companies whose securities are listed in the United States to comply with accounting provisions requiring the company to maintain books and records that accurately and fairly reflect all transactions of the corporation, including international subsidiaries, and to devise and maintain an adequate system of internal accounting controls for international operations. Activities that violate the FCPA, even if they occur wholly outside the United States, can result in criminal and civil fines, imprisonment, disgorgement, oversight, and debarment from government contracts.

Healthcare Reform

Current and future legislative proposals to further reform healthcare or reduce healthcare costs may result in lower reimbursement for our products, or for the procedures associated with the use of our products, or limit coverage of our products. The cost containment measures that payors and providers are instituting and the effect of any healthcare reform initiative implemented in the future could significantly reduce our revenues from the sale of our products. Alternatively, the shift away from fee-for-service agreements to capitated payment models may support the value of our products which can be shown to decrease resource utilization and lead to cost savings for both payors and providers.

HIPAA and Other Privacy Laws

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (“HIPAA”) established comprehensive protection for the privacy and security of health information. The HIPAA standards apply to three types of organizations, or “Covered Entities”: health plans, healthcare clearinghouses, and healthcare providers that conduct certain healthcare transactions electronically. Covered Entities and their business associates must have in place administrative, physical, and technical standards to guard against the misuse of individually identifiable health information. Some of our activities involve interactions with patients and their health information which implicate HIPAA. Our activities also involve us entering into specific kinds of relationships with Covered Entities and business associates of Covered Entities, which also implicate HIPAA. Penalties for violations of HIPAA include civil money and criminal penalties.

Our activities must also comply with other applicable privacy laws, which impose restrictions on the access, use and disclosure of personal information. More state and international privacy laws are being adopted. Many state laws are not preempted by HIPAA because they are more stringent or are broader in scope than HIPAA. Since 2020 we have also had to comply with the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, which protects personal information other than health information covered by HIPAA. In the E.U., the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) took effect in May 2018 and imposes increasingly stringent data protection and privacy rules. All of these laws may impact our business and may change periodically, which could have an effect on our business operations if compliance becomes substantially costlier than under current requirements. Our failure to comply with these privacy laws or significant changes in the laws restricting our ability to obtain patient samples and associated patient information could significantly impact our business and our future business plans.

19

Self-Referral Law

The federal “self-referral” law, commonly referred to as the “Stark” law, provides that physicians who, personally or through a family member, have ownership interests in or compensation arrangements with a laboratory are prohibited from making a referral to that laboratory for laboratory tests reimbursable by Medicare, and also prohibits laboratories from submitting a claim for Medicare payments for laboratory tests referred by physicians who, personally or through a family member, have ownership interests in or compensation arrangements with the testing laboratory. The Stark law contains a number of specific exceptions which, if met, permit physicians who have ownership or compensation arrangements with a testing laboratory to make referrals to that laboratory and permit the laboratory to submit claims for Medicare payments for laboratory tests performed pursuant to such referrals. We are subject to comparable state laws, some of which apply to all payors regardless of source of payment, and do not contain identical exceptions to the Stark law.

International Regulation

In order to market any of our products outside of the United States, we would need to comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements of other countries and jurisdictions regarding quality, safety and efficacy and governing, among other things, clinical trials, marketing authorization, commercial sales and distribution of our products. We may be subject to regulations and product registration requirements in the areas of product standards, packaging requirements, labeling requirements, import and export restrictions and tariff regulations, duties and tax requirements. Whether or not we obtain FDA approval for a product, we would need to obtain the necessary approvals by the comparable foreign regulatory authorities before we can commence clinical trials or marketing of the product in foreign countries and jurisdictions. The time required to obtain clearance required by foreign countries may be longer or shorter than that required for FDA clearance, and requirements for licensing a product in a foreign country may differ significantly from FDA requirements.

European Union

The European Union (“EU”) will require a CE mark certification or approval in order to market our products in the various countries of the European Union or other countries outside the United States. To obtain CE mark certification of our products, we will be required to work with an accredited European notified body organization to determine the appropriate documents required to support certification in accordance with existing medical device directive. The predictability of the length of time and cost associated with such a CE mark may vary or may include lengthy clinical trials to support such a marking. Once the CE mark is obtained, we may market our product in the countries of the EU.

European Good Manufacturing Practices

In the European Union, the manufacture of medical devices is subject to good manufacturing practice (“GMP”), as set forth in the relevant laws and guidelines of the European Union and its member states. Compliance with GMP is generally assessed by the competent regulatory authorities. Typically, quality system evaluation is performed by a Notified Body, which also recommends to the relevant competent authority for the European Community CE Marking of a device. The Competent Authority may conduct inspections of relevant facilities, and review manufacturing procedures, operating systems and personnel qualifications. In addition to obtaining approval for each product, in many cases each device manufacturing facility must be audited on a periodic basis by the Notified Body. Further inspections may occur over the life of the product.

20

Other Laws

Occupational Safety and Health

In addition to its comprehensive regulation of health and safety in the workplace in general, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration has established extensive requirements aimed specifically at laboratories and other healthcare-related facilities. In addition, because Lucid’s operations may require employees to use certain hazardous chemicals, Lucid also must comply with regulations on hazard communication and hazardous chemicals in laboratories. These regulations require Lucid, among other things, to develop written programs and plans, which must address methods for preventing and mitigating employee exposure, the use of personal protective equipment, and training.

Specimen Transportation

Our commercialization activities for EsoGuard subject Lucid to regulations of the Department of Transportation, the United States Postal Service, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that apply to the surface and air transportation of clinical laboratory specimens.

Environmental

The cost of compliance with federal, state and local provisions related to the protection of the environment has had no material effect on our business. There were no material capital expenditures for environmental control facilities in the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.

Employees

As of March 27, 2026 we had 41 employees (all of whom were full-time employees), inclusive of our executive officers — our Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), our President and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), our Chief Operating Officer (“COO”), our General Counsel and Secretary (“General Counsel”) and our Chief Medical Officer ("CMO"). No employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We consider our relationship with our employees to be good.

Corporate Information

We were incorporated in Delaware on June 26, 2014. Our corporate headquarters address is 360 Madison Avenue, 25th Floor, New York, NY 10017, and our main telephone number is (917) 813-1828.

Available Information

We file or furnish our current and periodic reports, proxy statements, registration statements and other information filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), including Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports. We make these reports available through our website (www.pavmed.com) as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such reports with, or furnish such reports to, the SEC. We also make available, free of charge on our website, the reports filed with the SEC by our named executive officers, directors, and 10% stockholders pursuant to Section 16 under the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after those filings are provided to us by those persons.

The public also may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days during the hours of 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding us that we file electronically with the SEC.

Our website address is www.pavmed.com. The content of our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K, nor in any other report or document we file or furnish with and /or submit to the SEC, and any reference to our website are intended to be inactive textual references only.

21