Get notified when NVDA files again. Create a free account and we'll email you the moment its next filing is analyzed.
Get filing alertsNVIDIA revenue surges 85% to $81.6B on Blackwell ramp; $18.6B ecosystem investments raise conflict concerns
Filed May 20, 2026 · Period ending April 26, 2026 · Compared to 10-Q May 28, 2025 · ~2 min read
Key Financials
SEC XBRL| Metric | PriorApr 27, 2025 | CurrentApr 26, 2026 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $44.1B | $81.6B | ▲ +85.2% |
| Net income | $18.8B | $58.3B | ▲ +210.6% |
| Diluted EPS | $0.76 | $2.39 | ▲ +214.5% |
| Operating income | $21.6B | $53.5B | ▲ +147.4% |
| Cash & equivalents | $15.2B | $13.2B | ▼ -13.1% |
| Long-term debt | $8.46B | $7.47B | ▼ -11.7% |
| Total assets | $125.3B | $259.5B | ▲ +107.2% |
As reported in XBRL by the filer · 10-Q vs 10-Q. Income figures cover the fiscal quarter (not year-to-date); cash & assets are period-end balances. verify on EDGAR →
Key Number Changes
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR →
Revenue $44,062 $39,331 $26,044 12 %69 %
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Revenue $81,615 $68,127 $44,062 20 %85 %
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR →
Gross margin60.5 %73.0 %78.4 %(12.5) pts(17.9) pts
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Gross margin74.9 %75.0 %60.5 %(0.1) pts14.4 pts
Prior filing · view on EDGAR →
Net income $18,775 $22,091 $14,881 (15)%26 % Net income per diluted share $0.76 $0.89 $0.60 (15)%27 %
Current filing · view on EDGAR →
Net income $58,321 $42,960 $18,775 36 %211 % Net income per diluted share $2.39 $1.76 $0.76 36 %214 %
Prior filing · view on EDGAR →
Total other income (expense), net ... $272 $370 $(98) The ... change in Other income (expense), net, compared to the first quarter of fiscal year 2025, was primarily driven by unrealized losses in our publicly-held equity securities due to fair value volatility in our investments, particularly CoreWeave and Arm, Inc.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Total other income, net ... $16,367 $272 $16,095 T ... he change in Other income (expense), net compared to the first quarter of fiscal year 2026, was primarily driven by unrealized gains on investments in publicly-held equity securities of $13.4 billion and non-marketable equity securities of $2.6 billion.
Prior filing · view on EDGAR →
We repurchased 126 million shares of our common stock for $14.5 billion during the first quarter of fiscal years 2026. As of April 27, 2025, we were authorized, subject to certain specifications, to repurchase up to $24.3 billion of our common stock. From April 28, 2025 through May 23, 2025, we repurchased 19 million shares for $2.3 billion pursuant to a pre-established trading plan.
Current filing · view on EDGAR →
In the first quarter of fiscal year 2027, we repurchased 108 million shares of our common stock for $20.2 billion. As of April 26, 2026, we were authorized, subject to certain specifications, to repurchase up to $38.5 billion of our common stock. On May 18, 2026, our Board of Directors approved an additional $80.0 billion in share repurchase authorization, without expiration.
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR →
We paid cash dividends to our shareholders of $244 million and $98 million during the first quarter of fiscal years 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
We paid cash dividends to our shareholders of $243 million during the first quarter of fiscal year 2027. On May 18, 2026, we increased our quarterly cash dividend from $0.01 per share to $0.25 per share to all shareholders of record on June 4, 2026. Our quarterly cash dividend will be paid on June 26, 2026.
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR →
We have a $575 million commercial paper program to support general corporate purposes. As of April 27, 2025, we had no commercial paper outstanding.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
We have a commercial paper program to support general corporate purposes, pursuant to which we may issue unsecured paper notes, from time to time or all at once, up to $25.0 billion. As of April 26, 2026, no commercial paper was outstanding.
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR →
Unrecognized tax benefits were $2.5 billion, which includes related interest and penalties, were recorded in non-current income tax payable as of April 27, 2025.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Unrecognized tax benefits were $4.5 billion, which includes related interest and penalties of $439 million, and were recorded in non-current income tax payable as of April 26, 2026.
Key Changes
-
high
NVIDIA deployed $18.6 billion into private companies and infrastructure funds, including AI model makers that may indirectly purchase NVIDIA products, creating potential conflicts of interest where the company invests in its own customers.
-
high
China data center revenue fell to zero from $4.6 billion year-over-year; company states it is 'effectively foreclosed' from China's data center market, helping competitors build ecosystems to challenge NVIDIA worldwide.
-
high
New H200 China licensing program requires U.S. inspection and triggers 25% tariff on importation; NVIDIA has generated no revenue under the program and may be unable to pass tariff costs to customers.
-
high
Customer deployments constrained by data center capacity, energy availability, and capital access; expanding energy capacity is a multi-year process with regulatory and construction challenges that could delay AI adoption.
-
high
Board approved $80 billion additional share repurchase authorization and increased quarterly dividend 25-fold from $0.01 to $0.25 per share, signaling aggressive capital return alongside $16.4 billion in unrealized investment gains.
Summary
NVIDIA delivered explosive Q1 FY2027 results with revenue up 85% year-over-year to $81.6 billion, driven by Blackwell platform adoption and Data Center revenue reaching $75.2 billion. Net income surged 211% to $58.3 billion, boosted by $16.4 billion in unrealized gains on equity investments. The company deployed $18.6 billion into private AI companies and infrastructure funds during the quarter, some of which may indirectly purchase NVIDIA products—a capital allocation strategy that raises conflict-of-interest questions as NVIDIA invests in its own customer base.The China market presents a stark contrast: data center revenue fell to zero from $4.6 billion in the prior year, and NVIDIA explicitly states it is 'effectively foreclosed' from China's data center computing market under current export controls. A new H200 licensing program launched in February 2026 has generated no revenue and subjects shipments to 25% tariffs, while China's antitrust regulators issued a preliminary finding that NVIDIA's compliance with U.S. export controls violated terms of the Mellanox acquisition approval. The company warns this foreclosure is helping competitors build ecosystems that challenge NVIDIA globally.
Demand-side constraints emerged as a new risk theme: customer ability to deploy AI infrastructure depends on data center capacity, energy availability, and capital access. NVIDIA notes that expanding energy capacity is a complex multi-year process, and less-capitalized customers may struggle to secure financing for large-scale projects. Watch next quarter for Rubin platform shipments (expected second half FY2027), progress on U.S. manufacturing expansion, and whether the $18.6 billion in ecosystem investments begin generating indirect revenue through customer purchases.
Section-by-Section Diff
MD&A
~5,700 words (-6% vs prior)Revenue up 85% YoY to $81.6B driven by Blackwell ramp; $18.6B ecosystem investments; new market platform reporting; H200 China licensing update.
Added in current filing · view on EDGAR →
In the first quarter of fiscal year 2027, we made the following investments: •$18.6 billion in private companies and infrastructure funds. Some of these investments include AI model makers that may indirectly purchase or use our products in the cloud. •We made investments in publicly-held equity securities where the value may fluctuate significantly and could adversely affect our financial results.
NVIDIA disclosed $18.6 billion in new investments in private companies and infrastructure funds during Q1 FY2027, including AI model makers that may indirectly purchase NVIDIA products. This represents a significant capital deployment into the ecosystem and creates potential conflicts of interest where NVIDIA invests in customers. The company also warns that publicly-held equity investments may fluctuate significantly and adversely affect financial results.
Added in current filing · view on EDGAR →
Following the rapid evolution in our businesses, we are transitioning to a new reporting framework that better reflects our current and future growth drivers. We will have two market platforms – Data Center and Edge Computing. Within Data Center, we will report two sub-markets, Hyperscale and ACIE which incorporates AI Clouds, Industrial, and Enterprise. Hyperscale will include revenue from the public clouds and the world’s largest consumer internet companies, ... while ACIE addresses our growth opportunity in diverse AI purpose-built data centers and AI factories across industries and countries. Edge Computing highlights devices for agentic and physical AI including PCs, game consoles, workstations, AI-RAN base stations, robotics and automotive.
NVIDIA introduced a new revenue reporting framework splitting business into Data Center (with Hyperscale and ACIE sub-markets) and Edge Computing platforms. This replaces prior segment-only disclosure and provides more granular visibility into customer mix, showing Hyperscale at approximately 50% of Data Center revenue with the other 50% from diversified ACIE customers. The change reflects the company's strategic positioning and growth drivers.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
We expect our Rubin platform to start shipping in the second half of fiscal year 2027. The complexity of bringing up our product architecture and sophisticated system configurations has caused and may in the future cause delays in production and create challenges in managing supply and demand. This could further result in revenue volatility, quality issues, increased inventory provisions, decreases in product yields and higher material costs, and/or increased warranty costs. Customers may postpone purchasing new architectures or may adopt new technologies more gradually than anticipated, affecting our revenue timing and supply chain expenses.
NVIDIA disclosed that its next-generation Rubin platform will begin shipping in the second half of fiscal year 2027. The company warns that architectural complexity may cause production delays, supply-demand mismatches, revenue volatility, quality issues, inventory provisions, yield problems, higher material costs, and increased warranty costs. This provides forward visibility on the product roadmap while flagging execution risks.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Beginning in February 2026, the U.S. government, or USG, granted licenses that allow us to ship small amounts of H200 products to specific China-based customers. To date, we have not generated any revenue under the H200 licensing program, and do not yet know whether any imports will be allowed into China. The license requires that the H200s go through an inspection process in the United States prior to any shipment to the customer. As a result, any H200 shipped under the new licensing program will be subject to a 25% tariff upon importation into the United States.
NVIDIA disclosed a new USG licensing program allowing limited H200 shipments to specific China customers, but has generated zero revenue under it to date. Products must undergo U.S. inspection before shipment and face a 25% tariff upon U.S. importation. This provides an update on China market access but signals minimal near-term revenue contribution and added cost/complexity.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
The recent rise in high-quality, open-source foundation models is making advanced AI capabilities broadly accessible. Open-source AI is dependent on developer adoption, and if deployed on our competitors’ platforms, it could reduce demand for our products and services.
NVIDIA added new disclosure identifying high-quality open-source foundation models as a competitive threat. If developers adopt open-source models on competitors' platforms rather than NVIDIA's, it could reduce demand for NVIDIA products and services. This acknowledges a strategic risk from the democratization of AI capabilities outside NVIDIA's ecosystem.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
The availability of data centers, energy, and capital to support the buildout of NVIDIA AI infrastructure by our customers and partners is crucial, and any shortage of these or other necessary resources could impact our future revenue and financial performance. Expanding energy capacity to meet demand is a complex, multi-year process that involves significant regulatory, technical, and construction challenges. In addition, access to capital can be particularly constrained for less-capitalized companies, which may face difficulties securing financing for large-scale infrastructure projects. These limitations could delay customer and partner deployments or reduce the scale of accelerated computing and AI adoption.
NVIDIA expanded its disclosure on infrastructure constraints, adding specific detail on energy capacity expansion challenges (regulatory, technical, construction) and capital access constraints for less-capitalized customers. The company warns these limitations could delay deployments or reduce AI adoption scale, directly impacting revenue and financial performance. This frames demand-side risks more concretely than prior generic references.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Sales of our H20 products were $4.6 billion for the first quarter of fiscal year 2026 prior to the new export licensing requirements. The H20 export licensing requirements have impacted our current revenue and will also negatively affect our future revenue.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
No shipments of Data Center Hopper products to China occurred during the quarter, compared with $4.6 billion in the first quarter of fiscal year 2026.
NVIDIA disclosed zero Data Center Hopper shipments to China in Q1 FY2027, down from $4.6 billion in Q1 FY2026 before export controls took effect. This quantifies the revenue loss from China export restrictions and confirms the ongoing impact, though the company removed prior-period language about evaluating limited options and being foreclosed from the China market.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Revenue $44,062 $39,331 $26,044 12 %69 %
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Revenue $81,615 $68,127 $44,062 20 %85 %
Revenue increased to $81.6 billion in Q1 FY2027, up 85% year-over-year and 20% sequentially, compared to $44.1 billion in Q1 FY2026 (up 69% YoY, 12% sequentially). The acceleration reflects continued strong demand for Blackwell systems and networking solutions, with Data Center revenue reaching $75.2 billion (up 92% YoY).
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Gross margin60.5 %73.0 %78.4 %(12.5) pts(17.9) pts
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Gross margin74.9 %75.0 %60.5 %(0.1) pts14.4 pts
Gross margin improved to 74.9% in Q1 FY2027 from 60.5% in Q1 FY2026, primarily due to the non-recurrence of the prior year's $4.5 billion H20 inventory charge. The current quarter's inventory provisions totaled $1.1 billion (1.2% margin impact) versus $5.3 billion (11.0% impact) in the prior year.
Previous filing · view on EDGAR →
Net income $18,775 $22,091 $14,881 (15)%26 % Net income per diluted share $0.76 $0.89 $0.60 (15)%27 %
Current filing · view on EDGAR →
Net income $58,321 $42,960 $18,775 36 %211 % Net income per diluted share $2.39 $1.76 $0.76 36 %214 %
Net income surged to $58.3 billion ($2.39 per diluted share) in Q1 FY2027, up 211% year-over-year, compared to $18.8 billion ($0.76 per share) in Q1 FY2026 (up 26% YoY). The dramatic increase reflects revenue growth, margin expansion from the non-recurrence of H20 charges, and $16.1 billion in other income driven by unrealized gains on equity investments.
Previous filing · view on EDGAR →
Total other income (expense), net ... $272 $370 $(98) The ... change in Other income (expense), net, compared to the first quarter of fiscal year 2025, was primarily driven by unrealized losses in our publicly-held equity securities due to fair value volatility in our investments, particularly CoreWeave and Arm, Inc.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Total other income, net ... $16,367 $272 $16,095 T ... he change in Other income (expense), net compared to the first quarter of fiscal year 2026, was primarily driven by unrealized gains on investments in publicly-held equity securities of $13.4 billion and non-marketable equity securities of $2.6 billion.
Other income swung from $272 million in Q1 FY2026 (which included unrealized losses on CoreWeave and Arm holdings) to $16.4 billion in Q1 FY2027, driven by $13.4 billion in unrealized gains on publicly-held equity securities and $2.6 billion on non-marketable equity securities. This reflects significant fair value appreciation in NVIDIA's investment portfolio.
Previous filing · view on EDGAR →
We repurchased 126 million shares of our common stock for $14.5 billion during the first quarter of fiscal years 2026. As of April 27, 2025, we were authorized, subject to certain specifications, to repurchase up to $24.3 billion of our common stock. From April 28, 2025 through May 23, 2025, we repurchased 19 million shares for $2.3 billion pursuant to a pre-established trading plan.
Current filing · view on EDGAR →
In the first quarter of fiscal year 2027, we repurchased 108 million shares of our common stock for $20.2 billion. As of April 26, 2026, we were authorized, subject to certain specifications, to repurchase up to $38.5 billion of our common stock. On May 18, 2026, our Board of Directors approved an additional $80.0 billion in share repurchase authorization, without expiration.
NVIDIA repurchased $20.2 billion of stock in Q1 FY2027 (108 million shares) versus $14.5 billion in Q1 FY2026 (126 million shares), reflecting higher share prices. The Board approved an additional $80 billion repurchase authorization in May 2026, bringing total remaining authorization to $118.5 billion ($38.5B existing + $80B new), signaling strong capital return commitment.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
We paid cash dividends to our shareholders of $244 million and $98 million during the first quarter of fiscal years 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
We paid cash dividends to our shareholders of $243 million during the first quarter of fiscal year 2027. On May 18, 2026, we increased our quarterly cash dividend from $0.01 per share to $0.25 per share to all shareholders of record on June 4, 2026. Our quarterly cash dividend will be paid on June 26, 2026.
NVIDIA increased its quarterly dividend 25-fold from $0.01 to $0.25 per share, effective June 2026. This represents a major shift in dividend policy, returning significantly more cash to shareholders alongside the expanded buyback program. The Q1 FY2027 dividend payment of $243 million was at the prior $0.01 rate.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
We have a $575 million commercial paper program to support general corporate purposes. As of April 27, 2025, we had no commercial paper outstanding.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
We have a commercial paper program to support general corporate purposes, pursuant to which we may issue unsecured paper notes, from time to time or all at once, up to $25.0 billion. As of April 26, 2026, no commercial paper was outstanding.
NVIDIA expanded its commercial paper program capacity from $575 million to $25.0 billion, a 43-fold increase. While no commercial paper is currently outstanding, this significantly enhances short-term liquidity flexibility and borrowing capacity to support general corporate purposes.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Unrecognized tax benefits were $2.5 billion, which includes related interest and penalties, were recorded in non-current income tax payable as of April 27, 2025.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Unrecognized tax benefits were $4.5 billion, which includes related interest and penalties of $439 million, and were recorded in non-current income tax payable as of April 26, 2026.
Unrecognized tax benefits increased from $2.5 billion to $4.5 billion, an 80% increase, reflecting growing uncertain tax positions as the company's income scales. The current disclosure separately quantifies $439 million in related interest and penalties. This represents potential future tax liability if positions are not sustained.
Show 4 minor / wording changes
Removed from previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
In January 2025, the USG published the “AI Diffusion” IFR in the Federal Register. After a 120-day delayed compliance period, the IFR would have imposed a worldwide licensing requirement on all products classified under Export Control Classification Numbers, or ECCNs, 3A090.a, 4A090.a, or corresponding .z ECCNs, including all related software and technology. The licensing requirement would have applied to our most popular data center products, such as our H200 and GB200. In May 2025, the USG announced that it would rescind the AI Diffusion IFR and implement a replacement rule. The scope, timing, and requirements of the forthcoming rule remain uncertain. The replacement rule may impose new restrictions on our products or operations and/or add license requirements that could have a material impact on our business, operating results, and financial condition.
Prior-period disclosure about the AI Diffusion IFR (which would have imposed worldwide licensing on H200/GB200 products) and its May 2025 rescission was removed. This is a lifecycle removal — the IFR was rescinded over a year ago, and the replacement rule uncertainty was a point-in-time regulatory development no longer current news. The underlying export control environment persists but is now addressed through other disclosures (H200 China licensing, general trade policy language).
Removed from previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
We plan to increase our U.S.-based manufacturing and invest in specialized equipment and processes to support domestic production. This move is expected to strengthen our supply chain, boost resiliency and redundancy, and meet the growing demand for AI infrastructure. Our ability to increase manufacturing capabilities will depend on the domestic manufacturing ecosystem's capacity to ramp production supply to the required volume and on a timely basis.
Prior disclosure about plans to increase U.S.-based manufacturing, invest in specialized equipment, and strengthen supply chain resiliency was removed. This is a lifecycle removal — the announcement of the plan was news in the prior period; a year later, the initiative is either integrated into operations or no longer a discrete forward-looking project requiring separate narrative disclosure. No indication the plan was abandoned.
Removed from previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Given our current and possible future earnings, we believe that we may release the valuation allowance associated with certain state deferred tax assets in the near term, which would decrease our income tax expense for the period the release is recorded. The timing and amount of the valuation allowance release could vary based on our assessment of all available information.
Prior disclosure about a potential near-term release of valuation allowance on state deferred tax assets was removed. This is a lifecycle removal — the prior period flagged an expected one-time tax benefit; a year later, either the release occurred (and is reflected in results) or the expectation changed, but the forward-looking statement is no longer current. No indication of a material weakness or adverse tax development.
Removed from previous filing · view on EDGAR →
Climate Change To date, there has been no material impact to our results of operations associated with global sustainability regulations, compliance, costs from sourcing renewable energy or climate-related business trends.
Prior standalone "Climate Change" section stating no material impact from sustainability regulations or climate trends was removed. This is a lifecycle removal — the statement was a point-in-time assessment; its absence does not signal a new material climate impact, just that the company no longer includes this standalone boilerplate disclosure in MD&A.
Risk Factors
~8,600 words (+19% vs prior)NVDA added competition risk, expanded export control details including China antitrust findings and new licensing programs, and disclosed energy/capital constraints.
Added in current filing · view on EDGAR →
Competition could adversely impact our market share and financial results. Our target markets remain competitive, and competition may intensify with expanding and changing product and service offerings, industry standards, customer and market needs, new entrants and consolidations. Other companies compete 31 with us on a wide range of parameters including price, total cost of ownership, and performance, which has resulted and may in the future result in lower-than-expected selling prices or demand for our products. Some of our competitors operate their own fabrication facilities, and have longer operating histories, larger customer bases, more comprehensive IP portfolios and patent protections, more design wins, and greater financial, sales, marketing and distribution resources than we do. These competitors may be able to acquire market share and/or prevent us from doing so, more effectively identify and capitalize upon opportunities in new markets and end-user trends, more quickly transition their products, and impinge on our ability to procure sufficient foundry capacity and scarce input materials during a supply-constrained environment, which could harm our business. Some of our customers are developing their own ASICs and other products, including designs optimized for certain workloads that may not require all of the features and functionality our data center systems provide. Others may offer cloud-based services that compete with our AI cloud service offerings, and we may not be able to establish market share sufficient to achieve the scale necessary to meet our business objectives. If we are unable to successfully compete in this environment, demand for our products, services, and technologies could decrease, which may negatively impact our business.
NVDA added a new standalone competition risk factor. The disclosure highlights that customers are developing their own ASICs optimized for specific workloads that may not need all NVIDIA features, and that cloud providers may compete with NVIDIA's AI cloud services. This signals growing competitive pressure from both vertical integration (customers building in-house chips) and horizontal competition (cloud service providers).
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
The availability of data centers, energy, and capital to support the buildout of NVIDIA AI infrastructure by our customers and partners is crucial, and any shortage of these and other necessary resources could impact our future revenue and financial performance. Expanding energy capacity to meet demand is a complex, multi-year process involving significant regulatory, technical, and construction challenges. In addition, access to capital can be particularly constrained for less-capitalized companies, which may face difficulties securing financing for large-scale infrastructure projects. These limitations could delay customer and partner deployments or reduce the scale of accelerated computing and AI adoption.
NVDA added disclosure that customer ability to deploy AI infrastructure depends on availability of data centers, energy, and capital. The company notes that expanding energy capacity is a multi-year process with regulatory and construction challenges, and that less-capitalized customers may struggle to secure financing. This is a demand-side constraint that could limit NVDA's revenue growth even if product supply is adequate.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
For example, regulators in China are investigating whether complying with applicable U.S. export controls discriminates unfairly against customers in the China market. If regulators conclude that we have failed to fulfill such commitments or we have violated any applicable law in China, we could be subject to financial penalties, restrictions on our ability to conduct our business, restrictions or other orders regarding our networking business, products, and services, or otherwise impact our operations in China, any of which could have a material and adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
On September 15, 2025, China’s antitrust regulators published their preliminary finding that our compliance with applicable U.S. export controls, which required us to offer degraded products to the Chinese market, discriminated unfairly against customers in the China market and therefore violated the terms of China’s approval of our Mellanox acquisition. If regulators conclude that we have failed to fulfill the terms of our Mellanox acquisition or we have violated any applicable law in China, we could be subject to financial penalties, restrictions on our ability to conduct our business, restrictions or other orders regarding our networking business, products, and services, or otherwise impact our operations in China, any of which could have a material and adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition.
China's antitrust regulators moved from investigating to publishing a preliminary finding on September 15, 2025 that NVDA's compliance with U.S. export controls violated the terms of China's approval of the Mellanox acquisition. The investigation has progressed to a formal preliminary adverse finding, increasing the likelihood of penalties or restrictions on NVDA's networking business in China.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Beginning in August 2025, the USG granted licenses that would allow us to ship certain H20 products to certain China-based customers. USG officials expressed an expectation that the USG will receive 15% or more of the revenue generated from licensed sales of our products, but the USG did not publish a regulation codifying such requirement.
NVDA disclosed that the U.S. government began granting licenses in August 2025 for H20 shipments to China, but USG officials expect to receive 15% or more of revenue from licensed sales. This is a new revenue-sharing arrangement that would reduce NVDA's net revenue on China sales, though the requirement is not yet codified in regulation.
Added in current filing · view on EDGAR →
Beginning in February 2026, the USG granted licenses that would allow us to ship small amounts of H200 products to specific China-based customers. To date, we have not generated any revenue under the H200 licensing program, and do not yet know whether any imports will be allowed into China. The license requires that the H200s go through an inspection process in the United States prior to any shipment to the customer. As a result, any H200 shipped under the new licensing program will be subject to a 25% tariff upon importation into the United States. In the event that we are able to sell licensed products into the China market, we may not be able to pass along all or any of the tariff to our customers, and may be subject to litigation, increased costs, and a harmed competitive position.
NVDA disclosed a new H200 licensing program starting February 2026 that requires U.S. inspection before shipment to China, triggering a 25% tariff on importation into the U.S. NVDA has generated no revenue under this program and may not be able to pass the tariff to customers. This creates a significant cost burden and competitive disadvantage for any China sales of H200.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Under the current rules and geopolitical landscape, we are unable to create and deliver a competitive product for China’s data center market that receives approval from both the USG and the Chinese government. As of the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2027, while we were able to ship uncontrolled products to China, such as gaming and workstation GPUs, we were effectively foreclosed from competing in China's data center computing/compute market, and our effective foreclosure from the China market helped our competitors build larger developer and customer ecosystems to challenge us worldwide. Unless we are able to return with a data center system that meets the approval of both the USG and the Chinese government, our lost opportunity and the benefit to our competitors will have a material and adverse impact on our business, operating results, and financial condition.
NVDA explicitly states it is "effectively foreclosed" from China's data center market as of Q1 FY2027, unable to create a product acceptable to both U.S. and Chinese governments. The company warns this foreclosure is helping competitors build ecosystems that challenge NVDA worldwide. This is a clear acknowledgment of permanent or long-term loss of a major market segment.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
For example, in October 2025, the Senate passed the GAIN AI Act in the National Defense Authorization Act. The GAIN AI Act would restrict the Trump Administration’s ability to adapt the Biden Administration’s export control rules and could also allow private U.S. persons to review and overturn licensing and foreign policy decisions made by the Trump Administration. Congress is also considering legislation such as the Remote Access Security Act, or RASA, which could prohibit the provision of cloud services to any company with an ultimate parent headquartered in China. If enacted, RASA could impose new restrictions on cloud service providers and OEMs, and could have a material impact on our business, operating results, and financial condition.
NVDA added disclosure of two new legislative developments: the GAIN AI Act (passed Senate October 2025) that restricts the Trump Administration's flexibility on export controls, and the proposed RASA legislation that could prohibit cloud services to China-parented companies. RASA, if enacted, would restrict NVDA's cloud service providers and OEM customers, materially impacting business.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Even if not enacted into binding legislation, draft bills have impacted and may in the future negatively impact our business. For example, following U.S. legislative proposals calling for mandatory features in our chips, China’s government publicly questioned whether our H20 products have built-in vulnerabilities, discouraging customers from purchasing our products. We provided a public response explaining that our GPUs, including H20, do not include such built-in vulnerabilities, and will respond to any follow-up questions we receive.
NVDA disclosed that China's government publicly questioned whether H20 products have built-in vulnerabilities following U.S. legislative proposals for mandatory chip features. This public questioning discouraged customers from purchasing NVDA products. NVDA responded publicly denying the vulnerabilities, but the episode illustrates how geopolitical tensions are creating reputational and demand risks even from proposed (not enacted) legislation.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
For example, the French Competition Authority (FCA) is questioning whether gaming GPUs and data center GPUs are separate product categories, an inquiry that may impact the export controls applicable to gaming products sold in France and Europe.
NVDA added disclosure that the French Competition Authority is questioning whether gaming and data center GPUs are separate product categories. If regulators conclude they are not separate, export controls currently limited to data center GPUs could expand to gaming products in France and Europe, disrupting a significant portion of NVDA's supply chain and revenue.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Product transitions are complex and we often ship both new and prior architecture products simultaneously as our channel partners prepare to ship and support new products. We are generally in various stages of transitioning the architectures of our Data Center, Gaming, Professional Visualization, and Automotive products. The computing industry is experiencing a broader and faster launch cadence of accelerated computing platforms to meet a growing and diverse set of AI opportunities. We have introduced a new product and architecture cadence of our Data Center solutions where we seek to complete new computing solutions each year and provide a greater variety of Data Center offerings.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Introducing or offering multiple architectures concurrently is complex and we often ship multiple architecture products simultaneously as our channel partners prepare to ship and support new products. We are generally in various stages of introducing and/or offering the architectures of our Data Center and Edge Computing products. The computing industry is experiencing a broader and faster launch cadence of accelerated computing platforms to meet a growing and diverse set of AI opportunities. We have introduced a new product and architecture cadence of our Data Center solutions where we seek to complete new computing solutions each year and provide a greater variety of Data Center offerings, including our Rubin platform which is expected to start shipping in the second half of fiscal year 2027.
NVDA changed language from "Product transitions" to "Introducing or offering multiple architectures concurrently" and added specific disclosure of the Rubin platform expected to ship in second half of fiscal 2027. The company also narrowed the scope from "Data Center, Gaming, Professional Visualization, and Automotive" to "Data Center and Edge Computing," suggesting a strategic focus shift. The Rubin disclosure provides a concrete product roadmap milestone.
Added in current filing · view on EDGAR →
•the availability of sufficient data center capacity or energy for customers to procure; •new product introductions and transitions resulting in less demand for existing products; •new or unexpected end-use cases; •increase in demand for competitive products; •changes in end-user demand; 32 •purchasing decisions made, and inventory levels held by, distributors, ODMs, OEMs, system integrators, other channel partners and other third parties; •the ability of developers, end customers and other third parties to build, enhance, and maintain accelerated computing applications that leverage our platforms; •the demand for accelerated computing, AI-related cloud services, or large language models; •changes that impact the ecosystem for the architectures underlying our products and technologies; •government actions or changes in governmental policies, such as export controls, increased restrictions on gaming usage, or tariffs; •our customers’ and partners’ ability to secure capital and energy and to build complex data center infrastructure timely; and •the availability of third-party content on our platforms, such as GeForce NOW.
NVDA expanded the demand estimation factors list, changing "our customers' ability to invest in AI infrastructure" to "our customers' and partners' ability to secure capital and energy and to build complex data center infrastructure timely." This more specific language emphasizes that capital availability, energy availability, and infrastructure build timelines are all separate constraints that can impact demand, not just general investment ability.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
In addition, geopolitical tensions, such as those involving Taiwan and China, which comprise a significant portion of our revenue and where we have suppliers, contract manufacturers, and assembly partners who are critical to our supply continuity, could have a material adverse impact on us.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Geopolitical tensions in regions where we rely on suppliers, contract manufacturers, and assembly partners that are critical to our supply continuity, could have a material adverse impact on us. Supply availability affecting memory, and other components, as well as rising prices, may drive the prices for data center buildouts higher.
NVDA removed the specific reference to "Taiwan and China" tensions and generalized the language to "regions where we rely on suppliers." The company also added new disclosure that supply availability and rising component prices may drive data center buildout costs higher. The removal of specific Taiwan-China mention may reflect sensitivity to geopolitical positioning, while the added cost language highlights inflationary pressures in the supply chain.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
We plan to increase our U.S.-based manufacturing and invest in specialized equipment and processes to support domestic production. Our ability to increase manufacturing capabilities will depend on the domestic manufacturing ecosystem's capacity to ramp production supply to the required volume timely. Delays or shortfalls could impact our ability to meet demand.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
We are increasing our U.S.-based manufacturing and investing in specialized equipment and processes to support domestic production. We may experience delays or difficulties in scaling production as planned. Our ability to increase manufacturing capabilities will depend on the domestic manufacturing ecosystem's capacity to ramp production supply to the required volume timely. Delays or shortfalls could impact our ability to meet demand.
NVDA changed language from "plan to increase" to "are increasing" U.S. manufacturing, indicating the initiative is now underway. The company added new disclosure that it "may experience delays or difficulties in scaling production as planned," acknowledging execution risk in the domestic manufacturing ramp. This suggests NVDA is actively building U.S. capacity but faces uncertainty about achieving planned scale.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Several states are considering enacting or have already enacted regulations concerning AI technologies, which may impact our ability to train, deploy, or release AI models, and increase our compliance costs.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Several states are considering enacting or have already enacted regulations concerning AI technologies, with new state laws that took effect on January 1, 2026, which may impact our ability to train, deploy, or release AI models, and increase our compliance costs.
NVDA added specific disclosure that new state AI laws took effect on January 1, 2026. This indicates that state-level AI regulation has moved from proposed to enacted and effective, creating new compliance obligations and potential restrictions on NVDA's AI model development and deployment activities.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
The increasingly complex export controls impose complex and burdensome compliance obligations on our partners, suppliers, and customers. While we seek to strictly comply with all applicable export control regulators, reports of diversion of controlled products may negatively impact our business, relationships with partners and customers, and our reputation. Incorrect allegations that our compliance efforts satisfy the letter but not the “spirit” of the applicable regulations may negatively impact our business, relationships with partners and customers, and our reputation.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
The increasingly complex export controls impose complex and burdensome compliance obligations on our partners, suppliers, and customers. We have provided and will continue to provide assistance to authorities regarding attempted diversion, but as we do not have physical control of our products after sale, we must also rely on the compliance programs of our customers and partners. While we seek to strictly comply with all applicable export control regulators, reports of diversion of controlled products, even when unsubstantiated and untrue, or any compliance failure at a customer or partner, may negatively impact our business, relationships with partners and customers, and our reputation. Incorrect allegations that our compliance efforts satisfy the letter but not the “spirit” of the applicable regulations, as well as incorrect allegations that legitimate and appropriate business is using supposed “loopholes” in the export controls may negatively impact our business, relationships with partners and customers, and our reputation.
NVDA added disclosure that it provides assistance to authorities regarding attempted diversion but must rely on customer and partner compliance programs since it lacks physical control post-sale. The company also added language that "unsubstantiated and untrue" diversion reports, compliance failures at customers/partners, and allegations of using "loopholes" can harm its reputation. This defensive language suggests NVDA is facing scrutiny or allegations about export control compliance and is preemptively addressing reputational risk.
Show 1 minor / wording change
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Open-source foundation models are rapidly growing in popularity with developers worldwide. Any regulatory control or other restriction that limits our ability to provide products and services that support third-party applications and models, including applications built on foundation models originating in China such as DeepSeek or Qwen, could have a material impact on our business, operating results, and financial condition.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Open-source foundation models are rapidly growing in popularity with developers worldwide. The demand for open-source foundation models and applications promotes use of our products worldwide. Any regulatory control or other restriction that limits our ability to provide products and services that support third-party applications and models, including applications built on foundation models originating in China such as DeepSeek, Qwen, or KIMMI, could have a material impact on our business, operating results, and financial condition.
NVDA added KIMMI to the list of China-originated open-source foundation models and added a new sentence emphasizing that demand for open-source models promotes use of NVDA products worldwide. This highlights that NVDA benefits from the open-source AI ecosystem, and any restrictions on supporting China-originated models would harm business. The addition of KIMMI suggests the list of relevant China models is expanding.
Thanks — your feedback helps us improve report quality.
Source-verified from EDGAR · Narrative written by AI · Jun 13, 2026 · How we verify