NASDAQ: IBIO

Obesity is associated with a broad range of cardiometabolic and cardiopulmonary complications, therefore, we are also evaluating selected adjacent indications where our AI Drug Discovery Platform and target biology may offer differentiated therapeutic opportunities. IBIO-600 is currently in clinical development, while our other product candidates are in preclinical development. We have not completed any clinical trials in humans for any therapeutic protein product candidate produced using our technology, and there is a risk that we will be unsuccessful in developing or commercializing any product candidates.

Following Clinical Trial Notification (“CTN”) acknowledgement from Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (“TGA”) and ethics approval from a Human Research Ethics Committee (“HREC”), we initiated a Phase 1 clinical trial of IBIO-600 in Australia and dosed the first participant in June 2026, marking our transition to a clinical-stage company and represented the first molecule generated using our AI Drug Discovery Platform to advance into clinical development. To date, we have enrolled 31 participants in the first four cohorts of the Phase 1 clinical trial of IBIO-600 in Australia. In parallel, we have accelerated the development of IBIO-610, a potentially first-in-class, long-acting antibody designed to inhibit Activin E, and anticipate commencing first-in-human clinical trials in the first half of calendar year 2027. We are also advancing additional preclinical programs, including IBIO-800, a myostatin × Activin A bispecific antibody being evaluated for potential use in PH-HFpEF.

Our discovery and development work is conducted at our San Diego research and development (“R&D”) laboratory space, where our AI and ML scientists and biopharma researchers operate side by side. This close integration of disciplines enables rapid iteration between AI-enabled design and translational validation, compressing the timeline from hypothesis to clinic. With our robust platform, focused clinical and preclinical pipeline, and growing scientific and leadership team, we are building a durable and differentiated position in obesity therapeutics—one designed to outlast the first wave and define what comes next.

Key Achievements in Fiscal Year 2026 and Q1 of Fiscal Year 2027

Progress on Obesity and Cardiometabolic Pipeline

● Advanced IBIO-610, a long-acting Activin E antibody, into IND-enabling studies: Initiated chemistry, manufacturing and controls (“CMC”) development and good laboratory practice (“GLP”) toxicology studies in rats and non-human primates. Our preclinical studies demonstrated a prolonged half-life and near-complete suppression of active Activin E through eight weeks in obese non-human primates, as well as fat-specific activity and enhanced body-composition effects in combination with semaglutide in mouse and non-human primate models.

● Advanced IBIO-600, a long-acting myostatin antibody, through the single ascending dose portion of its first-in-human Phase 1 clinical trial: Initiated a first-in-human trial and dosed the first participant in June 2026, approximately two years after program initiation. To date, 31 participants have been dosed across all four planned single ascending dose (“SAD”) cohorts, with no safety findings identified that would preclude dose escalation. iBio is now preparing to advance IBIO-600 into the multiple ascending dose (“MAD”) portion of the study.

● Advanced IBIO-800, a myostatin × Activin A bispecific antibody, into IND-enabling development: Selected a development candidate and initiated IND-enabling activities, including CMC development and nonclinical toxicology studies, while presenting preclinical data supporting its potential to preserve muscle and address cardiopulmonary disease, particularly PH-HFpEF.

● Expanded the amylin receptor antibody program we are working with in collaboration with AstralBio by combining new GPCR antigen engineering and multidimensional antibody selection capabilities: Addressed the challenge of discovering antibodies with precise activity across closely related receptor variants by combining engineered G protein-coupled receptor (“GPCR”) antigens that mimic multiple receptor configurations with mammalian display-based combinatorial selection for subtype specificity, cross-species binding, functional activity and developability. We believe this approach can be used to generate next-generation agonist antibodies with distinct and differentiated amylin receptor pharmacology.

Financial Stability

● Closed a public offering in August 2025 for a total gross proceeds of up to $100 million: The offering was led by Balyasny Asset Management, and included participation from Cormorant Asset Management, Adage Capital Partners, Ally Bridge Group, Marshall Wave, Coastlands Capital, SilverArc Capital Management, Vestal Point Capital, and Ausangate Capital. The total gross proceeds of up to $100 million assumes the exercise of all of the warrants sold in the offering in full for cash.

● Closed a private investment in January 2026 for total gross proceeds of $26 million: Entered into a securities purchase agreement with healthcare-focused, high-quality institutional investors led by Frazier Life Sciences and other existing investors.

● Entered into an Open Market Sale AgreementSM with Jefferies LLC providing for the sale, from time to time, by us of up to $100,000,000 of shares of Common Stock.

Strengthened our Board of Directors and Senior Leadership Team

● Added a new Board member with strong financial and biotech expertise: Expanded the Board expertise with the appointment of Dr. Elizabeth Stoner who brings deep biotechnology industry experience and proven leadership in both capital markets and clinical stage drug development.

● Appointed Chief Medical Officer: In August 2026, we appointed Dr. Molly Carr as Chief Medical Officer, whose over 30 years of clinical, academic, and biopharmaceutical experience in endocrinology and metabolic diseases is expected to lead the Company’s global clinical strategy, medical affairs, and regulatory initiatives.

Recent Developments

AstralBio Amylin License

On August 27, 2026, we entered into an exclusive license agreement related to Amylin (the “Amylin License Agreement”) with AstralBio, Inc. (“AstralBio”), pursuant to which AstralBio has licensed to us, on a worldwide exclusive basis and with the right to grant sublicenses, under the AstralBio Licensed Patents (as defined in the Amylin License Agreement) and AstralBio Licensed Know-How (as defined in the Amylin License Agreement) the right to Develop, Manufacture and Commercialize and otherwise exploit any product directed to Amylin that contains the licensed antibody targeting Amylin, for research, diagnosis, treatment, prevention, or management of any disease or medical condition worldwide (the “Amylin Licensed Product”). All capitalized terms herein have the definitions assigned to them in the Amylin License Agreement unless otherwise defined herein.

We are solely responsible for all decisions related to the launch, sales and marketing and promotion of Amylin Licensed Product in our discretion, subject to the terms of the Amylin License Agreement, and for all costs for all activities related to, the Development, Manufacture and Commercialization of the Amylin Licensed Product worldwide. In consideration for the rights and licenses granted by AstralBio to us in the Amylin License Agreement, we agreed to pay AstralBio (i) an upfront license fee in the amount of $750,000 within thirty days after the effective date of the Amylin License Agreement, and (ii) upon the occurrence of specified developmental and commercial milestones, including net sales, milestone payments of up to an aggregate of $28 million, which can be paid by cash or, provided we remain listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market (“Nasdaq”) or another national stock exchange at the time of the payment, by issuing shares of our Common Stock, subject to approval of the issuance of any such shares by Nasdaq, and provided, however, in no event shall we issue to AstralBio pursuant to the Amylin License Agreement shares of our Common Stock resulting in AstralBio owning more than 19.9% of the total number of shares of our Common Stock outstanding as of the date of entering into the Amylin License Agreement. In the event we sublicense an Amylin Licensed Product or a product that includes an Amylin Licensed Product, we will pay AstralBio a sublicense fee, which fee is a range of a low to mid-single-digit percentage based on the proceeds of the sublicense fees to a third party.

The Amylin License Agreement will remain in effect at all times and thereafter, unless and until terminated earlier pursuant to the Amylin License Agreement. The Amylin License Agreement can be terminated (i) by the Company for any reason or no reason upon 45 days’ written notice to AstralBio; (ii) by either party upon written notice to the other party if the other party materially breaches the Amylin License Agreement and such breach is not cured to the reasonable satisfaction of the non-breaching party within 90 days of receipt of such written notice, subject to certain exceptions; (iii) by either party upon certain bankruptcy or insolvency events of the other party; and (iv) by either party if the other party or any sublicensee challenges the patentability, enforceability or validity of any claim related to any Patent or the secret and substantial nature of any Know-How, such Patent and/or Know-How being licensed to the party making the challenge, subject to certain exceptions as set forth in the Amylin License Agreement.

Strategy

We are developing next-generation antibody medicines for obesity and its cardiometabolic and cardiopulmonary complications. One of the most important advances in modern obesity treatment has been the emergence of GLP-1 receptor agonists and other incretin-based therapies. These drugs have transformed the field by enabling weight loss that, in some cases, rivals the effects of invasive bariatric surgery. But as physicians and patients gain real-world experience, it’s becoming increasingly clear first-generation therapies, while groundbreaking, leave important gaps.

Our approach to the evolving needs in obesity treatment is facilitated by our fully integrated antibody discovery platform, designed from the ground up for precision, speed and developability. At the core of our AI Drug Discovery Platform is an AI-enabled epitope steering engine enabling us to precisely direct antibodies to functional hotspots on even the most challenging targets—often considered undruggable. When combined with our antibody optimization platform, which deeply integrates generative AI tools with mammalian display technology, we can progress from concept to development-ready antibody in as little as seven months.

Our strategic approach to fulfilling our mission is outlined as follows:

● Our disease area strategy rests on three pillars:

o Therapeutic Focus: Develop potential therapies for obesity, cardiometabolic and cardiopulmonary diseases, including therapies that may complement or follow GLP-1 treatment, provide well-tolerated monotherapy alternatives for patients unable or unwilling to remain on GLP-1s, or address additional areas of high unmet needs.

o Target Selection: Prioritize targets with strong human validation – genetic or pharmacologic – to reduce development risk and increase the likelihood of achieving first- or best-in-class outcomes.

o Competitive Advantage: Leverage the integration of our AI-driven discovery platform, domain expertise, experienced personnel and advancing preclinical pipeline to accelerate differentiation and unlock targets others cannot.

● Capital efficient business approach: Our strategic business approach is structured around the following pillars of value creation:

o Developing and Advancing our Pipeline Cost Effectively: Drug discovery and clinical advancement of our pipeline remain central to our success. As a clinical-stage company, we continue to advance clinical and preclinical programs in obesity, cardiometabolic and cardiopulmonary diseases, while also evaluating potential partnerships around select assets to maximize their value and accelerate development timelines.

o Strategic Collaborations: We continue to pursue selective strategic collaborations using our existing portfolio of obesity and immuno-oncology assets, in order to accelerate our preclinical programs efficiently.

o Out-Licensing in Diverse Therapeutic Areas: We are evaluating opportunities for out-licensing our AI Drug Discovery Platform to broaden its use beyond our core focus areas of obesity, cardiometabolic, and cardiopulmonary diseases. These opportunities include potential partnerships in therapeutic areas such as immunology, inflammation, pain, and vaccines. Through such arrangements, we aim to provide partners with access to our AI-based discovery and screening technologies in order to generate non-dilutive cash flow along with potential revenue streams while maintaining operational focus on our internal research and development priorities.

In essence, we believe we are sculpting a future where cutting-edge AI-driven biotechnology propels the discovery of intricate biologics, fostering partnerships, accelerating innovation, and propelling the advancement of science.

The current product candidate pipeline is set forth below.

IBIO-610

Activin E is part of the transforming growth factor-β (“TGF-β”) superfamily and has been implicated in the regulation of energy homeostasis and overall metabolic health. Human genetic studies provide compelling support for Activin E as a therapeutic target, as individuals carrying loss-of-function variants of the INHBE gene exhibit reduced visceral fat, improved lipid profiles, and lower risk of cardiometabolic diseases.

By leveraging our AI Drug Discovery Platform, we believe we have successfully identified the first antibody inhibiting Activin E. Preclinical data from multiple in vitro cell-based assays, including one on a human adipocyte cell line, demonstrated robust blockade of Activin E-mediated signaling. The antibody has been evaluated in multiple pre-clinical studies in a model of diet-induced obesity (“DIO”) in mice, both alone with bi-weekly dosing and in combination with semaglutide dosed daily. These results suggest IBIO-610 may induce fat-selective weight loss.

In vitro characterization of IBIO-610. Target protein binding measured via SPR. Reporter cell line assay used HEK293 reporter cell line with ALK7 receptor stably integrated. 200pM Activin E used. Differentiated human adipocyte, treated with 100nM Activin E.

In a DIO mouse model, IBIO-610 was administered biweekly at 10 mg/kg for four weeks to evaluate its effects as a monotherapy. Treated mice were observed to have an 8.9% reduction in body weight compared to baseline and placebo, with body composition analysis revealing a 26% reduction in fat mass and no measurable loss of lean mass. Outlier non-responder mice were excluded.

To test potential combination therapy with incretin treatments, IBIO-610 was dosed biweekly alongside daily semaglutide. While semaglutide alone produced a 27.8% reduction in body weight (baseline and placebo adjusted), the combination resulted in a more pronounced 35.3% weight loss, without any additive effect on food intake. The combination also led to a greater reduction in visceral fat compared to semaglutide alone, suggesting complementary mechanisms that enhance metabolic benefit.

IBIO-610 was also tested as a maintenance therapy following cessation of semaglutide treatment. In this model, DIO mice were first dosed with semaglutide for two weeks, leading to approximately 18% weight loss. Upon stopping semaglutide, control mice regained 71% of the lost weight within three weeks, with fat mass levels returning to those of untreated animals. In contrast, mice receiving IBIO-610 at the time of semaglutide discontinuation regained only 28% of the lost weight and retained significantly lower fat mass at study termination, highlighting the potential of IBIO-610 to prevent rebound weight gain.

Prevention of weight regain after cessation of GLP-1 treatment in mouse model of obesity by IBIO-600. n=10 per group, IBIO-610 dosed S.C. at 10 mg/kg twice per week. Semaglutide dosed at 10nmol/kg S.C. daily. Organ weights determined via necropsy.

IBIO-610 was evaluated in a preclinical pharmacokinetic (“PK”) and a body composition study in obese, mature non-human primates (“NHPs”) designed to characterize systemic exposure and assess early signs of activity on fat and body composition. In previously disclosed results from this study, IBIO-610 demonstrated a terminal half-life of approximately 33.2 days in obese NHPs following administration, and based on allometric scaling approaches, we estimated a projected human half-life of up to 100 days, which may support infrequent dosing. In addition, in a small study that was not statistically powered, following two once-every-eight-week doses, treatment with IBIO-610 was associated with 6.7% lower visceral fat and 5.2% lower total fat mass compared with vehicle-treated obese NHPs, with a slight increase in lean mass. These findings are consistent with the fat-selective profile we observed in prior rodent studies. Additionally, obese NHPs treated with a single IV dose of IBIO-610 showed up to a 98% reduction in serum levels of active Activin E.

In July 2026, we announced new preclinical data from our obese NHP study evaluating IBIO-610. Following a single dose of IBIO-610, active Activin E levels in the blood were reduced in all treated NHPs and remained suppressed through eight weeks. At both weeks 4 and 8, active Activin E levels were reduced to levels below the limits of the assay. Overall, active Activin E was reduced by 98% at week 4 and 97% at week 8 compared with baseline. We believe that these findings support IBIO-610's potential for best-in-class pathway inhibition and further support the potential for an infrequently dosed, long-acting antibody approach. The data also demonstrated IBIO-610's potential to promote fat-selective weight loss while preserving lean mass. In obese NHPs, when combined with semaglutide, IBIO-610 drove greater visceral and total fat loss while reducing lean mass loss by 73% versus semaglutide alone, further supporting its potential as both a stand-alone therapy and a complementary approach to GLP-1-based treatments.

Following these studies, we initiated CMC and nonclinical toxicology activities to support the advancement of IBIO-610 toward clinical development and we anticipate commencing first-in-human clinical trials in the first half of calendar year 2027.

IBIO-800: Myostatin x Activin A Bispecific Antibody

We are developing a bispecific antibody program targeting myostatin, growth differentiation factor 11 (“GDF11”) and Activin A, that we now refer to as IBIO-800. We are evaluating IBIO-800 for potential use in obesity and cardiopulmonary disease, including PH-HFpEF. Leveraging our innovative AI Drug Discovery Platform, IBIO-800 is in late discovery, where multiple parameters, including potency, selectivity, expression, stability and manufacturability, are being optimized. We nominated a development candidate in June 2026 and initiated CMC and nonclinical testing to enable continued progression of this program.

IBIO-800 is designed to selectively neutralize what we believe are key pathological ligands across multiple aspects of disease biology. Based on our preclinical work, Activin A may contribute to cardiac fibrosis and vascular remodeling, while myostatin and GDF11 may contribute to skeletal muscle dysfunction and reduced functional capacity. In combination, IBIO-800 is designed to reduce cardiac fibrosis, reverse pulmonary vascular remodeling, and improve whole body functional capacity, while avoiding some of the safety considerations associated with broader TGF-β ligand blockade.

In preclinical in vitro studies, early findings in human muscle progenitor or muscle stem cells suggest our bispecific candidates induced greater differentiation and fusion into mature muscle cells than antibodies targeting myostatin or Activin A alone. In addition, in human cardiac fibroblast studies, growth differentiation factor 8 (“GDF8”), GDF11 and Activin A promoted fibrotic activation and pro-inflammatory or pro-fibrotic gene expression, supporting the biological rationale for combined blockade in cardiopulmonary disease. We are also evaluating the program in vivo in a mouse model designed to assess stress-induced right ventricular remodeling in the setting of obesity and hemodynamic stress. In June 2026, we nominated a development candidate and are initiating CMC and nonclinical testing to enable continued progression of the program.

IBIO-600

Myostatin, also known as GDF8, is a member of the TGF-β family that regulates and limits skeletal muscle growth. A loss of function in the myostatin gene eliminates this inhibitory effect, leading to increased muscle mass and strength. This genetic alteration results in significant muscle hypertrophy (increased size) and hyperplasia (increased number of

muscle fibers). While these effects can enhance muscle development, they may also have implications for overall metabolism and cardiovascular health.

In April 2024, as result of the collaboration with AstralBio, Inc. (“AstralBio”) we initiated a program to discover and develop a long-acting anti-myostatin antibody. Using our StableHu platform coupled with mammalian display, we optimized hit antibodies across multiple parameters, including affinity for myostatin, binding to the FcRn receptor, expression levels in mammalian cells, and resistance to poly-reactivity and aggregation. The final candidate, IBIO-600, was also observed to have a beneficial profile between thermostability and resistance to stress conditions during initial testing.

In vitro, IBIO-600 was evaluated in human muscle progenitor cells, where it potently inhibited myostatin. This inhibition facilitated the differentiation of progenitor cells into mature human muscle cells. In interim data from a preclinical study in obese mice, we observed that IBIO-600 dose-dependently prevented lean mass loss when administered in combination with a GLP-1 receptor agonist.

In November 2024, we initiated a study in obese and elderly NHPs for IBIO-600. The primary goal of the study was to assess the PK profile of IBIO-600. The study consisted of two dose levels, a low dose of 5 mg/kg and a high dose of 50 mg/kg, with a single subcutaneous injection in each case. In addition to monitoring PK in serum, the study analyzed body composition changes over time by employing DEXA scans, measuring lean and fat mass.

Serum concentration of IBIO-600 in obese NHPs after a single 5 mg/kg I.V. dose. n=3

The study consisted of six NHPs, sorted randomly into the low and high dose groups. IBIO-600 promoted an increase in lean mass and a reduction in fat mass from baseline values. Standard PK calculations indicated the half-life of IBIO-600 in NHPs was approximately 52.4 days. By using multiple allometric scaling approaches, we estimated the half-life in humans of IBIO-600 as falling with a range of 57-147 days. IBIO-600 also demonstrated durable body composition effects, including lean mass gains of up to 5.1% with accompanying reductions in fat mass.

Change in Lean and Fat Mass in obese NHPs treated with a single 5 mg/kg I.V. dose of IBIO-600. N=3 per group. Region of Interest DEXA scan on gluteal and thigh region.

Following the NHP PK study, we initiated CMC manufacturing and nonclinical toxicology activities to support advancement of IBIO-600 toward clinical development. We have completed good manufacturing practices (“GMP”) manufacturing of an initial batch of drug product being used in our clinical study. Additionally, we have completed 1-month GLP toxicology studies in both rats and NHPs.

In June 2026, we announced the dosing of the first participant in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, first-in-human, phase 1 SAD clinical trial. This study is intended to test the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of IBIO-600 in overweight or obese adults, as well as exploratory effects on body composition, with four SAD cohorts currently planned. All four SAD cohorts have been enrolled in this study with 31 participants and each will be monitored for approximately nine months following administration, with study completion expected in second half of 2027. Data from the study will help inform potential future development of IBIO-600. This trial is designed to establish the initial human profile of IBIO-600 and begin generating evidence of its effects on body composition, helping to inform potential future studies in combination with GLP-1-based therapies. We are now preparing to advance IBIO-600 into the MAD portion of the study. Further, we intend to continue progressing the development of IBIO-600 in obesity, sarcopenia, and other muscle loss disorders.

Amylin Receptor Agonist Engineered Antibody

In collaboration with AstralBio, we initiated the development of an antibody agonists targeting the amylin receptor, a potentially highly promising mechanism in obesity treatment. Amylin receptors are closely related, multi-component GPCR complexes, making it challenging to discover antibodies with precisely controlled receptor subtype selectivity and functional activity. To address this challenge, we combined engineered GPCR antigens designed to mimic distinct amylin and calcitonin receptor configurations with our mammalian display-based discovery platform. This approach enables multidimensional antibody selection across properties including receptor subtype specificity, cross-species binding, functional activity and developability. Using these capabilities, we have generated both dual amylin and calcitonin receptor agonist (“DACRA”) antibodies and selective amylin receptor agonist (“SARA”) antibodies designed to activate specific amylin receptor subtypes while avoiding activation of the calcitonin receptor.

Early preclinical results to date show the promise of the approach. In a proof-of-concept study in DIO mice, an early DACRA-like agonist antibody delivered approximately a ~60% reduction in acute food intake (p<0.05), compared with a 67% reduction observed with a benchmark DACRA peptide. Building on these results, we generated and characterized AMY1-selective, AMY3-selective and dual AMY1/AMY3 agonist antibodies, referred to as SARA antibodies, with distinct in vitro potency and selectivity profiles.

These data support the feasibility of using engineered antibodies to achieve differentiated amylin receptor pharmacology and demonstrate the application of our integrated discovery platform to a complex GPCR target class. The program provides an additional demonstration of our ability to combine engineered antigens with multidimensional mammalian display-based selection to generate functionally differentiated antibody candidates against challenging membrane-protein targets.

AI Discovery Tools

The integration of AI into our drug discovery process accelerates antibody discovery, clone optimization, and technology innovation for preclinical development. By combining our proprietary technology stack with deep biological expertise, we aim to enhance pipeline productivity and increase the probability of success.

Our proprietary technology stack includes (1) Epitope Steering, our patented AI engine directing antibody binding to precisely defined regions of target proteins, increasing selectivity and therapeutic impact, and (2) StableHu, a generative AI tool that rapidly optimizes antibodies for expression, stability, and manufacturability; and mammalian display-based multidimensional screening, enabling simultaneous optimization of affinity, specificity, and developability in a single selection step. Together, these tools power a full stack platform enabling us to go from concept to hit generation within weeks, accelerating the development of potential first-in-class and best-in-class biologics. The EngageTxTM technology enables us to target bi-specific molecules.

AI-Technology Platform

Overview

Our AI-powered antibody discovery and development platform integrates complementary technologies designed to improve the discovery, optimization and engineering of antibodies against therapeutically relevant, including hard-to-drug, targets.

Our AI Drug Discovery Platform can be viewed across three primary stages:

Discovery. Our Epitope Steering technology uses AI-designed engineered epitopes to direct antibody discovery toward specific regions and conformations of a target protein associated with a desired biological function. By designing the antigen used in antibody discovery, we can bias selection toward antibodies with specific functional properties, including antibodies intended to achieve complex mechanisms of action such as receptor agonism or selective pathway modulation. These engineered epitopes can be used with our fully human antibody library, which is built on clinically validated human frameworks and designed to provide a diverse starting pool for the identification of functional, developable antibody candidates.

Optimization. Antibodies identified through our discovery process can be optimized using our StableHu AI technology together with mammalian display. StableHu generates focused human antibody sequence diversity, while mammalian display enables screening based on characteristics such as potency, selectivity, cross-species reactivity and developability. Together, these technologies are designed to improve antibody properties and reduce downstream development risk.

Therapeutic Engineering. Optimized antibodies can then be incorporated into more advanced therapeutic formats. For example, our EngageTx technology provides a panel of optimized CD3 antibodies that can be paired with tumor-targeting antibodies to generate bispecific T-cell engagers with a range of potencies and other potentially differentiated characteristics.

These technologies are designed to operate as an integrated platform: Epitope Steering and our antibody library support discovery; StableHu and mammalian display support optimization; and technologies such as EngageTx enable more complex therapeutic formats.

iBio’s Technology Stack Addresses Several Current Challenges in Antibody Discovery

AI Epitope Steering Technology

Epitopes—the small binding sites on large target proteins—are a critical factor in generating antibodies with the desired biological effects. Traditional antibody discovery methods often struggle with dominant epitopes that overwhelm screening, obscuring antibodies against more therapeutically valuable sites. These approaches also tend to yield few or no hits against complex, hard-to-drug immunosubdominant epitopes that limits the potential efficacy of the discovered antibodies.

Our Epitope Steering technology directly addresses these limitations by guiding antibody generation toward predefined regions of a target protein. Using AI, we design engineered epitopes—precisely modeled and optimized fragments of the target—to improve structural fidelity, solubility, and stability. These engineered epitopes enable efficient antibody selection from naïve or immunized libraries, significantly increasing discovery success, especially for agonistic or functionally active antibodies.

This approach is broadly applicable across complex protein classes and holds promise in unlocking new targets in in the field of immune-oncology (I/O), but it could also be transformative in various other disease areas such as cardiometabolic, immunology, and pain management. Moreover, it has potential applications in vaccine design, offering new opportunities for disease prevention.

iBio’s patented epitope steering technology

Naïve Human Antibody Library

The fully human antibody library is built upon clinically validated, entirely human antibody frameworks. By leveraging public databases, we have extracted a diverse array of Complementarity-Determining Region (CDR) sequences. Subsequently, we have meticulously eliminated a range of sequence liabilities. Such careful curation process could potentially significantly reduce the development risk for antibodies identified from our library.

StableHu AI Antibody-Optimizing Technology

Antibody optimization is a pivotal step in the development of therapeutic antibodies. It refines an antibody's properties to enhance its efficacy, safety, and manufacturability. This process includes humanization, which alters non-human antibodies to mimic human antibodies, thereby reducing the risk of immune reactions when used in therapy.

Our proprietary StableHu technology is instrumental in this optimization process. StableHu is an AI-powered tool designed to predict a library of antibodies with human CDR variants based on an input antibody. This input can range from an early, unoptimized molecule to an approved drug. The model has been trained utilizing a set of over 1 billion human antibodies, by masking known amino acids within CDRs to train the algorithm to predict the human sequences.

While phage display libraries are often used in antibody optimization due to their vast diversity, they can increase developability risks such as low expression, instability, or aggregation of antibodies. Mammalian display libraries, on the other hand, offer significantly improved developability but reduced diversity due to the smaller library size they can handle. StableHu overcomes this limitation by utilizing a machine learning algorithm generating focused library diversity within the capacity of mammalian display.

Mammalian display is a technology that presents antibodies on the surface of mammalian cells, allowing for the direct screening and selection of antibodies in a mammalian cell environment. This approach is advantageous as antibodies that express well on the mammalian cells used in the display are more likely to express well in the production cell line. Moreover, single-cell sorting of antibody-displaying cells allows rapid selection of desired antibodies based on multiple dimensions, such as potency, selectivity, and cross-species selectivity.

When paired with mammalian display technology, StableHu enables antibody optimization with fewer iterative optimization steps, lower immunogenicity risk, and improved developability.

StableHu Antibody Optimization Technology

EngageTx CD3-Based T-Cell Engager Panel

CD3-based T-cell engagers potentially offer significant clinical benefits in cancer treatment. They have the potential to effectively target and eliminate a wide range of tumor types, including those resistant to other therapies. By recruiting and activating the body's own T-cells to specifically target cancer cells, they can overcome some mechanisms of immune evasion, potentially leading to improved patient outcomes. However, first-generation T-cell engaging bispecific antibodies often face challenges related to safety and efficacy. They can cause severe side effects, such as cytokine release syndrome due to overactivation of the immune system. Additionally, they may lack specificity, which can lead to off-target effects and damage to healthy tissues. The lack of NHP cross-reactivity also prevents safety assessment in higher species.

To address these limitations, we applied StableHu technology to antibodies derived from an epitope steering campaign and a first-generation T-cell engager. This approach generated a diverse CD3 antibody panel with a wide potency range,

enabling flexible pairing with various tumor-targeting antibodies. The resulting molecules retained potent tumor-killing activity while significantly reducing cytokine release, potentially lowering the risk of cytokine release syndrome.

StableHu also increased antibody humanness, reducing immunogenicity risk, and introduced NHP cross-reactivity—allowing for robust preclinical safety assessments ahead of clinical trials.

CD3-Based T-Cell Engager Panel EngageTx

Programs Available for Partnering Outside the Cardiometabolic Area

There have been notable advances in the field of oncology in recent years, and arguably none more important than the advent of immunotherapies. We have a pipeline of pre-clinical programs with differentiated profiles and potential impact. We are exploring the best path forward for these programs, with a focus on identifying partners who bring complementary capabilities and a shared vision for patient impact.

TROP-2 x CD3 Bispecific

iBio’s lead TROP-2 x CD3 bispecific antibody, developed with our EngageTx platform, is designed to harness T cells to selectively kill TROP-2–expressing tumors while minimizing the cytokine release that often limits the tolerability of T-cell engagers. TROP-2 is highly expressed in a range of solid tumors, including breast, lung, colorectal, and pancreatic cancers. Unlike TROP-2 antibody-drug conjugates that risk damaging healthy cells, our bispecific approach aims to widen the therapeutic window and deliver a durable anti-tumor response. In preclinical studies, our lead molecule demonstrated potent tumor cell killing with a reduced cytokine release profile compared to a first-generation T-cell engager and showed a 36% reduction in tumor size after a single dose in a humanized mouse model of squamous cell carcinoma.

EGFRvIII

Epidermal growth factor receptor variant III (“EGFRvIII”) is a tumor-specific variant of the EGFR that is absent from healthy tissues, making it an attractive target for cancer therapy. It is most commonly associated with glioblastoma and head and neck cancer, but can also occur in breast, lung, and ovarian cancers. Traditional EGFR-targeted approaches have been limited by off-target effects on healthy cells, whereas our patented AI-enabled epitope steering platform has generated antibodies that selectively recognize a unique epitope on EGFRvIII without binding wildtype EGFR. In preclinical studies, these molecules demonstrated strong binding to EGFRvIII, selective tumor cell killing in vitro while sparing healthy cells, and a 43% reduction in tumor growth in a mouse model of head and neck cancer, supporting their potential as safer, more precise anti-tumor therapies.

CCR8

G protein–coupled receptors (“GPCRs”) represent one of the most successful therapeutic target classes, but antibody development against them has historically been challenging due to their complex structure. Chemokine receptor 8 (“CCR8”), a GPCR selectively expressed on immunosuppressive Tregs, has emerged as a promising oncology target since depleting tumor-associated Tregs can enhance anti-tumor immunity. Unlike CCR4, which is broadly expressed on immune cells and presents safety risks if targeted, CCR8 provides a more tumor-focused approach. Using our AI-enabled discovery platform, we generated anti-CCR8 antibodies with high specificity, strong binding to CCR8-expressing cells, and potent depletion of primary human Tregs while sparing CCR4. In preclinical studies, our lead CCR8 antibody inhibited tumor growth and produced a 22% reduction in tumor size in a colon cancer mouse model, supporting its potential as a differentiated Treg-targeting immunotherapy.

Modalities

Epitope steering, a technology iBio is pioneering, has the potential to positively impact various areas of medicine. In the field of immuno-oncology, it can be used to develop antibodies targeting specific cancer antigens, potentially enhancing the efficacy of treatments like checkpoint inhibitors and CAR-T therapies.

The technology also holds promise in the realm of systemic secreted and cell-surface therapeutics. Here, epitope steering can be applied to the development of antibodies, circulating immune modulation factors, secreted enzymes, and transmembrane proteins. This could be particularly beneficial in treating diseases such as heart failure, infectious diseases, and rare genetic conditions. In the context of localized regenerative therapeutics, epitope steering could potentially be used to develop treatments that target specific damaged or diseased tissues. This approach could be particularly beneficial in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Intratumoral immuno-oncology is another area where epitope steering could make a significant impact. It could potentially be used to develop treatments that alter the tumor microenvironment to favor an immune response against tumors, potentially enhancing the efficacy of treatments that use immune-stimulatory proteins. The potential of epitope steering extends to cancer vaccine development as well. The ability to target specific epitopes could be beneficial in the development of vaccines, particularly those that aim to increase the number and antitumor activity of a patient's T cells. Finally, epitope steering could be used to develop treatments for a wide range of diseases, including those in the immune-oncology space, immunology, pain, and potentially in vaccine development. This is particularly relevant for complex and hard-to-drug protein structures.

Digital Infrastructure

iBio is a firm believer in the transformative power of digital technologies, including robotics, automation, AI, ML, and cloud computing. These technologies are integral to operationalizing our strategy, accelerating our learning curve, and executing at scale. As such, we have made substantial investments in these areas. Our aspiration is to digitize our operations to the greatest extent possible, harnessing the potential of digital technology to maximize our impact on human health. As we continue to grow, we remain committed to further investing in our digital infrastructure to support our ambitious goals.

Strategic Alliances, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures

We have formed collaborations and strategic alliances to gain access to funding, capabilities, technical resources and intellectual property to further our development efforts, commercialize our technology and to generate revenues, including through the use of our patented epitope-steering AI-engine and our EngageTx platform.

Several agreements with AstralBio

Discovery, Option and License Agreement: On March 27, 2024, we entered into a collaboration with AstralBio to discover and develop novel antibodies for obesity and other cardiometabolic diseases. As part of the collaboration, we granted an exclusive license to our AI-powered technology to identify and engineer four (4) targets for the treatment of obesity and cardiometabolic diseases, of which AstralBio may continue the pre-clinical development and deploy its proven drug development expertise to advance candidates to an Investigational New Drug (“IND”) application. We have the exclusive option to license three (3) obesity and cardiometabolic targets from AstralBio and will receive the rights to develop,

manufacture and commercialize those targets upon exercise. In April 2025, we amended our collaboration with AstralBio to add a fifth target for the treatment of cardiometabolic disease. We intend to identify and create an antibody against such target, leveraging our proprietary AI Drug Discovery Platform. In exchange for adding an additional target to the collaboration, AstralBio provided us with a $750,000 credit which we applied toward the option fee for the exclusive license of the novel antibody that inhibits the function of Activin E.

Exclusive License Agreement (Myostatin Target): As a result of this collaboration with AstralBio, on December 31, 2024, we exercised our first option under the collaboration with AstralBio and entered into an exclusive agreement (the “Myostatin License Agreement”) with AstralBio, pursuant to which AstralBio licensed to us, on a worldwide exclusive basis and with the right to grant sublicenses, under the AstralBio Licensed Patents (as defined in the Myostatin License Agreement) and AstralBio Licensed Know-How (as defined in the Myostatin License Agreement) the right to develop, manufacture and commercialize and otherwise exploit any product directed to GDF8 (myostatin) that contains the licensed antibody targeting myostatin, now named IBIO-600, for research, diagnosis, treatment, prevention, or management of any disease or medical condition. We are solely responsible for all decisions related to the launch, sales and marketing and promotion of IBIO-600 in our discretion, subject to the terms of the Myostatin License Agreement, and for all costs for all activities related to the development, manufacture and commercialization of IBIO-600 worldwide. IBIO-600 was identified by AstralBio using our proprietary technology stack and was designed for subcutaneous administration with the potential for an extended half-life. In parallel, we initiated a bispecific antibody program targeting myostatin/activin A to treat obesity and cardiometabolic disorders, leveraging our proprietary technology stack as well as the technology of IBIO-600.

In consideration for the rights and licenses granted by AstralBio to us pursuant to the Myostatin License Agreement, we agreed to pay AstralBio (i) an upfront license fee in the amount of $750,000 within thirty days after the effective date of the Myostatin License Agreement, which we paid by issuing AstralBio 246,087 shares of our Common Stock on January 28, 2025 and (ii) upon the occurrence of specified developmental and commercial milestones, milestone payments of up to a total of $28 million, which can be paid by cash or, provided we remain listed on a national stock exchange at the time of the payment, by issuing shares of our Common Stock, subject to approval of the issuance of any such shares by NYSE American or another national stock exchange at the time of the payment, and provided, however, in no event shall we issue to AstralBio pursuant to the Myostatin License Agreement resulting in AstralBio owning more than 19.9% of the total number of shares of our Common Stock as of the date of entering into the Myostatin License Agreement. In the event we sublicense IBIO-600 or a product that includes IBIO-600, we are obligated to pay AstralBio a sublicense fee, which fee is a range of a low to mid-single-digit percentage based on the proceeds of the sublicense fees to a third party.

Exclusive License Agreement (Activin E): On April 21, 2025, we entered into an exclusive agreement related to Activin E (the “Activin E License Agreement”) with AstralBio, pursuant to which AstralBio has licensed to us, on a worldwide exclusive basis and with the right to grant sublicenses, under the AstralBio Licensed Patents (as defined in the Activin E License Agreement) and AstralBio Licensed Know-How (as defined in the Activin E License Agreement) the right to develop, manufacture and commercialize and otherwise exploit any product directed to Activin E that contains the licensed antibody targeting Activin E, now named IBIO-610, for research, diagnosis, treatment, prevention, or management of any disease or medical condition. IBIO-610 was identified by AstralBio using our proprietary technology stack and was designed for subcutaneous administration with the potential for an extended half-life.

We are solely responsible for all decisions related to the launch, sales and marketing and promotion of IBIO-610 in its discretion, subject to the terms of the Activin E License Agreement, and for all costs for all activities related to, the development, manufacture and commercialization of IBIO-610 worldwide. In consideration for the rights and licenses granted by AstralBio to us in the Activin E License Agreement, we agreed to pay AstralBio (i) an upfront license fee in the amount of $750,000 within thirty days after the effective date of the Activin E License Agreement, which we paid by using a one-time credit equal to $750,000 (the “Credit”) provided by AstralBio pursuant to a collaboration us entered into with AstralBio in March 2024 in exchange for us identifying and creating an antibody against an undisclosed exclusive target for AstralBio, and (ii) upon the occurrence of specified developmental and commercial milestones, milestone payments of up to a total of $28 million, which can be paid by cash or, provided we remains listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market (“Nasdaq”) or another national stock exchange at the time of the payment, by issuing shares of our Common Stock, subject to approval of the issuance of any such shares by Nasdaq, and provided, however, in no event shall we issue to AstralBio pursuant to the Activin E License Agreement resulting in AstralBio owning more than 19.9% of the total number

of shares of our Common Stock as of the date of entering into the Activin E License Agreement. In the event we sublicense IBIO-610 or a product that includes IBIO-610, we will pay AstralBio a sublicense fee, which fee is a range of a low to mid-single-digit percentage based on the proceeds of the sublicense fees to a third party.

Exclusive License Agreement (Amylin): On August 27, 2026, we entered into the Amylin License Agreement with AstralBio, pursuant to which AstralBio has licensed to us, on a worldwide exclusive basis and with the right to grant sublicenses, under the AstralBio Licensed Patents (as defined in the Amylin License Agreement) and AstralBio Licensed Know-How (as defined in the Amylin License Agreement) the right to Develop, Manufacture and Commercialize and otherwise exploit an Amylin Licensed Product. All capitalized terms herein have the definitions assigned to them in the Amylin License Agreement unless otherwise defined herein.

We are solely responsible for all decisions related to the launch, sales and marketing and promotion of Amylin Licensed Product in our discretion, subject to the terms of the Amylin License Agreement, and for all costs for all activities related to, the Development, Manufacture and Commercialization of the Amylin Licensed Product worldwide. In consideration for the rights and licenses granted by AstralBio to us in the Amylin License Agreement, we agreed to pay AstralBio (i) an upfront license fee in the amount of $750,000 within thirty days after the effective date of the Amylin License Agreement, and (ii) upon the occurrence of specified developmental and commercial milestones, including net sales, milestone payments of up to an aggregate of $28 million, which can be paid by cash or, provided we remains listed on Nasdaq or another national stock exchange at the time of the payment, by issuing shares of our Common Stock, subject to approval of the issuance of any such shares by Nasdaq, and provided, however, in no event shall we issue to AstralBio pursuant to the Amylin License Agreement shares of our Common Stock resulting in AstralBio owning more than 19.9% of the total number of shares of our Common Stock outstanding as of the date of entering into the Amylin License Agreement. In the event we sublicense an Amylin Licensed Product or a product that includes an Amylin Licensed Product, we will pay AstralBio a sublicense fee, which fee is a range of a low to mid-single-digit percentage based on the proceeds of the sublicense fees to a third party.

Several agreements with RubrYc Therapeutics, Inc. (“RubrYc”)

On August 23, 2021, we entered into a series of agreements with RubrYc described in more detail below:

Collaboration and License Agreement: iBio entered into a collaboration and licensing agreement (the “RTX-003 License Agreement”) with RubrYc to further develop RubrYc’s immune-oncology antibodies in its RTX-003 campaign. During the term of the RTX-003 License Agreement, RubrYc granted us an exclusive worldwide sublicensable royalty-bearing license under the patents controlled by RubrYc that cover the RTX-003 antibodies. The RTX-003 License Agreement was terminated when we acquired substantially all of the assets of RubrYc in September 2022, including RubrYc’s immune-oncology antibodies in its RTX-003 campaign.

Collaboration, Option and License Agreement: iBio entered into a collaboration agreement (the “Collaboration Agreement”) with RubrYc to collaborate for up to five years to discover and develop novel antibody therapeutics using RubrYc’s artificial intelligence discovery platform. In addition, RubrYc granted us an exclusive option to obtain a worldwide sublicensable commercial license with respect to each of the lead product candidates resulting from such collaboration programs (the “Selected Compounds”). With the exception of any obligations that survive the termination, the Collaboration Agreement was terminated when we acquired substantially all of the assets of RubrYc in September 2022.

Stock Purchase Agreement: In connection with the entry into the Collaboration Agreement and RTX-003 License Agreement, iBio also entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (“Stock Purchase Agreement”) with RubrYc whereby we purchased 1,909,563 shares of RubrYc’s Series A-2 preferred stock (“Series A-2 Preferred”) for $5,000,000 and acquired an additional 954,782 shares of RubrYc’s Series A-2 Preferred. In connection with the Stock Purchase Agreement, we entered into the RubrYc Therapeutics, Inc. Second Amended and Restated Investors’ Rights Agreement (the “Investors’ Rights Agreement”), RubrYc Therapeutics, Inc. Second Amended and Restated Voting Agreement (the “Voting Agreement”) and the RubrYc Therapeutics, Inc. Second Amended and Restated Right of First Refusal and Co-Sale Agreement (the “Right of First Refusal and Co-Sale Agreement”).

The rights, preferences of and privileges of the RubrYc Series A-2 Preferred Stock (“Series A-2 Preferred”) are set forth in the Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of RubrYc Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Amended RubrYc COI”), and include a preferential eight percent (8%) dividend, senior rights on liquidation, the right to elect a Series A-2 Preferred director for as long as we held at least 1,500,000 shares of RubrYc stock, the right to vote on an as-converted basis, certain anti-dilution and other protective provisions, the right to convert the Series A-2 Preferred into shares of RubrYc common stock at our option, and mandatory conversion of the Series A-2 Preferred into shares of RubrYc common stock upon (a) the closing of a firm-commitment underwritten public offering to the public pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act, for shares of RubrYc common stock at a per share price of at least five (5) times the Series A-2 Original Issue Price (as defined in the Amended RubrYc COI) and resulting in at least $30,000,000 of gross proceeds to RubrYc or (b) such other date, time or event, specified by vote or written consent of the majority of the aggregate voting power, on an as-converted basis, of the RubrYc Series A preferred stock (“Series A Preferred” and together with the Series A-2 Preferred, the “Senior Preferred Stock”) and Series A-2 Preferred. The Right of First Refusal and Co-Sale Agreement gives RubrYc the right of first refusal on stock sales by key holders, generally defined as founders, and a second right of first refusal and a co-sale right to specified other investors, including certain holders of Senior Preferred Stock and iBio.

The Investors’ Rights Agreement provides the holders of Senior Preferred Stock with, among things: (i) demand registration rights, under specified circumstances; (ii) piggyback registration rights in the event of a company registered offering; (iii) lock-up and market-standoff obligations following a registered underwritten public offering; (iv) preemptive rights on company offered securities; and (v) additional protective covenants that require the approval at least two of the three directors elected by the holders of the Senior Preferred Stock.

Pursuant to the Voting Agreement, certain RubrYc stockholders are contractually obligated to, among other things, vote for and maintain the authorized number of directors at five members, one of which we have the contractual right to elect subject to the conditions set forth above.

Asset Purchase Agreement: On September 19, 2022, we purchased substantially all of the assets of RubrYc, including the AI Drug Discovery Platform, RTX-003 (IBIO-101), all Selected Compounds, three additional immune-oncology candidates, a PD-1 agonist, in addition to laboratory and technology equipment pursuant to an asset purchase agreement, dated September 16, 2022 (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”). On September 19, 2022, in connection with the closing of the acquisition, we entered into a termination agreement (the “Termination Agreement”) with RubrYc in order terminate the RTX-003 License Agreement and the Collaboration Agreement, which terminated any and all future milestone payments or royalty obligations we had under those agreements. Under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, upon closing of the acquisition, we made an upfront payment of approximately $1,000,000 by issuing 5,117 shares of our Common Stock to RubrYc. RubrYc is also eligible to receive up to $5,000,000 in development milestones over the period of five years from the date of the Asset Purchase Agreement, which can be paid in shares of our Common Stock or cash, at our sole discretion. In addition, we had advanced RubrYc $484,000 to support their operation costs during the negotiation period and incurred transaction costs totaling $208,000, which were also capitalized as part of the assets acquired. The assets acquired include the patented AI Drug Discovery Platform, all rights with no future milestone payments or royalty obligations, to IBIO-101 (RTX-003), in addition to five preclinical assets plus a PD-1 agonist. The Asset Purchase Agreement contained representations, warranties and covenants of RubrYc and us.

Intellectual Property

We currently own 13 patents. Of the 13 patents, 7 are U.S. and 6 are international. Since July 1, 2023, we have primarily focused our intellectual property estate on our preclinical assets including provisional and regular patents in the U.S. and overseas, including for CD25 antibodies, CCR8 antibodies, EGFRvIII antibodies, anti-MUC16 antibodies, TROP-2 antibodies, CD3 antibodies, and for high-efficiency, conditionally-activated antibodies. We now have 16 U.S., 4 Patent Cooperation Treaty, and 50 international applications pending. One Chinese, one Canadian, and a U.S. application have been allowed but not yet issued. International patents and applications include numerous foreign countries including Australia, Canada, China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Korea, and the European regional phase. All of our patents will expire between 2027 and 2042.

Included in the 88 patents and patent applications are U.S. and foreign patents and applications that we acquired from RubrYc for novel antibodies, scaffold technology, and a machine learning apparatus for engineering meso-scale peptides.

Our success will depend in part on our ability to obtain and maintain patent protection for our technologies and preclinical assets. Our policy is to seek to protect our proprietary rights, by among other methods, filing patent applications in the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions to cover certain aspects of our technology. We continue to prepare patent applications relating to our expanding technology in the U.S. and abroad.

The technology and products covered by our issued and pending patent applications are summarized below:

Product Patent Applications, Technology, and Know-How (U.S. and International)

● Antibodies

● Antibodies against CCR8

● Antibodies against EGFRvIII

● Antibodies against MUC16

● Antibodies against TROP2

● Antibodies against CD3

● High-efficiency, conditionally-activated antibodies

Pending Technology Patent Applications and Know-How (U.S. and International)

● Antigen scaffold technology

● Machine learning apparatus for engineering meso-scale peptides

● Methods of making conditionally-activated antibodies

Competition

The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are characterized by rapidly advancing technologies, intense competition and a strong emphasis on proprietary products.

We face competition from many different sources, including commercial pharmaceutical and biotechnology enterprises, academic institutions, government agencies, and private and public research institutions. Our commercial opportunities will be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop and commercialize products that are safer, more effective, have

fewer side effects or are less expensive than any products that we or our collaborators may develop based on the use of our technologies.

While we believe that the potential advantages of our new technologies will enable us to compete effectively against other providers of technology for biologic product development and drug discovery, many of our competitors have significantly greater financial resources and expertise in research and development, manufacturing, preclinical testing, clinical trials, regulatory approvals and marketing approved products than we do. Smaller or early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through arrangements with large and established companies, and this may reduce the value of our technologies for the purposes of establishing license agreements. In addition, these third parties compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel, establishing clinical trial sites and patient registration for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies and technology licenses complementary to our programs or advantageous to our business.

We expect to rely upon licensees, collaborators or customers for support in advancing certain of our drug candidates and intend to rely on additional work with our collaborators during our efforts to commercialize our product candidates. Our licensees, collaborators or customers may be conducting multiple product development efforts within the same disease areas that are the subjects of their agreements with us. Agreements with collaborators may not preclude them from pursuing development efforts using a different approach from that which is the subject of our agreement with them. Any of our drug candidates, therefore, may be subject to competition with a drug candidate under development by a customer.

There are currently approved vaccines and therapies for many of the diseases and conditions addressed by the product candidates our partners and collaborators may be developing or manufacturing or in our own pipeline. Technological developments in our field of research and development occur at a rapid rate and we expect competition to intensify as advances in this field are made. We will be required to continue to devote substantial resources and efforts to our research and development activities.

As a biopharmaceutical company developing next generation obesity therapeutics, we compete with a broad range of companies. At the highest level, our therapeutics can be seen as both a complement and a potential competitor to any obesity therapeutic, most incretin peptides, biologics, other peptide therapies, siRNAs, surgical interventions, and small molecules. Certain of our competitors have substantially greater capital resources, large customer bases, broader product lines, sales forces, greater marketing and management resources, larger research and development staffs with extensive facilities and equipment than we do and have more established reputations as well as global distribution channels. Our most significant competitors, among others, are fully integrated pharmaceutical companies such as Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk A/S, Amgen Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Merck & Co., Inc., Novartis AG, MedImmune, LLC (a wholly owned subsidiary of AstraZeneca PLC), Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer Inc., Merck KGaA and Sanofi SA, and more established biotechnology companies such as Genentech, Inc. (a member of the Roche Group), and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. We also compete with additional companies who are more advanced in the obesity and cardiometabolic space, such as Keros Therapeutics, Inc., Scholar Rock Holding Corporation, Biohaven, Ltd., Basecure Therapeutics Inc., Structure Therapeutics, Inc., Viking Therapeutics, Inc., Veru Inc., Zealand Pharma A/S, Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Skye Bioscience, Inc., Laekna, Inc., Wave Life Sciences Ltd., Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Helicore Biopharma Inc., as well as tech enabled drug discovery companies such as Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AbCellera Biologics, Inc., Cellarity, Inc., BenevolentAI, Nabla Technologies, Inc., and others, some of which have substantially greater financial, technical, sales, marketing, and human resources than we do.

Research and Development

Our research and development functions are focused on the creation of new products and services, as well as enhancements to our existing offerings, both of which are necessary to maintain our competitive position. Our research and development activities take place primarily at our facilities in San Diego. iBio has leased lab and office space in San Diego for the purpose of conducting research. For the fiscal years 2026 and 2025, iBio spent $19.6 million and $8.3 million, respectively, in R&D related activities.

Suppliers

We outsource certain functions and supplies to third parties. While we rely on our outsourcing partners to perform their contracted functions, we are continuing to build internal capabilities. Our suppliers are generally available to meet our demands and supply requirements, but our items are long lead time items that have been exacerbated by the current macro environment due to increased demand. We continue to mitigate the risks through inventory management, relationship management and evaluation of alternative sources when possible. Refer to Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” for a description of risks associated with our reliance on suppliers and outsourcing partners.

Manufacturing

We do not own or operate facilities for clinical drug manufacturing, storage, distribution or quality testing. Currently, all of our clinical manufacturing is outsourced to third-party manufacturers. We have entered into agreements with five contract research organizations (“CROs”) for CMC development, non-clinical toxicology and related studies to advance IBIO-600 and IBIO-610 towards clinical testing in addition to clinical studies for IBIO-600. However, we have not entered into any long-term supply agreements or commercialization partnerships with these vendors. Certain material suppliers and manufacturing sites for IBIO-600 and IBIO-610 are in locations outside of the U.S.

Certain third-party manufacturers may require us to enter in manufacturing agreements with them that include substantial milestone payments and royalties. As our development programs expand and we build new process efficiencies, we expect to continually evaluate our strategy of utilizing third party manufacturers with the objective of satisfying demand for our registration trials and, if approved, the manufacture, sale and distribution of commercial products.

While the materials and substances used in our product candidates are manufactured by more than one supplier, the number of suppliers is limited. In the event it is necessary or advisable to acquire drug materials, substances, and products from alternative suppliers, we might not be able to obtain them on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. It could also require significant time and expense to transfer or redesign our manufacturing processes to work with another company. If approved by the FDA, we anticipate that we will be able to enter into agreements with third parties to manufacture and distribute our product candidates on commercially reasonable terms.

Antibody Discovery

We have internal antibody display and discovery capabilities; however, at times we may continue to rely on third parties to conduct antibody discovery and optimization services for us based on criteria and specifications provided by us. Certain antibody discovery and optimization vendors require us to enter into a license with them for the right to use antibodies discovered by them in human use or for commercial purposes. Such license could include substantial milestone payments and royalties to the extent we choose to use an antibody discovered by such vendor. We have exercised our option to receive such a license from AstralBio pursuant to the Myostatin License Agreement. Please see the description above in “Strategic Alliances, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures – Several agreements with AstralBio - Exclusive License Agreement (Myostatin Target)” for more details on the terms of this agreement.

Government Regulation and Product Approval

Government authorities in the United States at the federal, state and local level and in other countries extensively regulate, among other things, the research, development, testing, manufacture, quality control, approval, labeling, packaging, storage, record-keeping, promotion, advertising, distribution, post-approval monitoring and reporting, marketing and export and import of drug products. Generally, before a new drug can be marketed, considerable data demonstrating its quality, safety and efficacy must be obtained, organized into a format specific to each regulatory authority, submitted for review and approved by the regulatory authority.

U.S. Drug Approval Process

All of the vaccine and therapeutic products developed from our technologies will require regulatory approval by governmental agencies prior to commercialization. In particular, pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines are subject to rigorous

preclinical testing and clinical trials and other pre-marketing approval requirements by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) and regulatory authorities in other countries. In the U.S., various federal, and, in some cases, state statutes and regulations, also govern or impact the manufacturing, safety, labeling, storage, record-keeping and marketing of vaccines and pharmaceutical products. The lengthy process of seeking required approvals and the continuing need for compliance with applicable statutes and regulations requires the expenditure of substantial resources. Regulatory approval, if and when obtained for any of our product candidates, may be limited in scope, which may significantly limit the indicated uses for which our product candidates may be marketed. Further, FDA approved vaccines and drugs are subject to ongoing oversight and discovery of previously unknown problems may result in restrictions on their manufacture, sale or use, or in their withdrawal from the market.

The process required by the FDA before a drug or biological product may be marketed in the United States generally involves the following:

● completion of pre-clinical laboratory tests and animal studies according to good laboratory practices (“GLP”) and applicable requirements for the humane use of laboratory animals or other applicable regulations;

● submission to the FDA of an IND application which must become effective before human clinical trials may begin;

● performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials according to the FDA’s regulations commonly referred to as good clinical practices (“GCPs”) and any additional requirements for the protection of human research subjects and their health information, to establish the safety and efficacy of the proposed biological product for its intended use;

● submission to the FDA of a New Drug Application (“NDA”) or Biologics License Application (“BLA”) for marketing approval that meets applicable requirements to ensure the continued safety, purity, and potency of the product that is the subject of the NDA or BLA based on results of pre-clinical testing and clinical trials;

● satisfactory completion of an FDA pre-approval inspection of the manufacturing facility or facilities where the product candidates are produced, to assess compliance with cGMP, to assure that the facilities, methods and controls are adequate to preserve the product’s identity, strength, quality and purity;

● potential FDA audit of the pre-clinical trial and clinical trial sites that generated the data in support of the NDA or BLA; and

● FDA review and approval of the NDA or licensure of the BLA.

Preclinical Tests

Before any product candidates with potential immunization or therapeutic value may be tested in human subjects, we must satisfy stringent government requirements for preclinical studies. Preclinical testing includes both in vitro and in vivo laboratory evaluation and characterization of the safety and efficacy of the product candidate. “In vitro” refers to tests conducted with cells in culture and “in vivo” refers to tests conducted in animals. The conduct of the preclinical tests must comply with federal regulations and requirements including GLP. Preclinical testing results obtained from studies in several animal species, as well as data from in vitro studies, are submitted to the FDA as part of an IND application and are reviewed by the FDA prior to the commencement of human clinical trials. These preclinical data must provide an adequate basis for evaluating both the safety and the scientific rationale for the initial clinical trials. In the case of vaccine candidates, animal immunogenicity and immune protection tests must establish a sound scientific basis to believe that the product candidate may be beneficial when administered to humans.

IND

An IND becomes effective automatically 30 days after receipt by the FDA unless the FDA raises concern or questions about the conduct of the clinical trials as outlined in the IND prior to that time. In such an event, the IND sponsor and the FDA must resolve any outstanding concerns before clinical trials may proceed. For additional information on the most recent FDA regulations and guidance on vaccine and therapeutic product testing and approval, visit its website at http://www.fda.gov. The FDA may also impose clinical holds on a product candidate at any time before or during clinical trials due to potential safety concerns or non-compliance. If the FDA imposes a clinical hold, trials may not recommence without FDA authorization and then only under terms authorized by the FDA. Accordingly, we cannot be sure that submission of an IND will result in the FDA allowing clinical trials to begin, or that, once begun, issues will not arise that suspend or terminate such trials.

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials involve the administration of the product candidate to healthy volunteers or patients under the supervision of qualified investigators, generally physicians not employed by or under the trial sponsor’s control. Clinical trials are conducted under protocols detailing, among other things, the objectives of the clinical trial, dosing procedures, subject selection and exclusion criteria, and the parameters to be used to monitor subject safety, including stopping rules that assure a clinical trial will be stopped if certain adverse events should occur. Each protocol and any amendments to the protocol must be submitted to the FDA as part of the IND. Clinical trials must be conducted and monitored in accordance with the FDA’s regulations composing the good clinical practice requirements, including the requirement that all research subjects provide informed consent. Further, each clinical trial must be reviewed and approved by an independent institutional review board (the “IRB”) at or servicing each institution at which the clinical trial will be conducted. An IRB is charged with protecting the welfare and rights of trial participants and considers such items as whether the risks to individuals participating in the clinical trials are minimized and are reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits. The IRB also approves the form and content of the informed consent that must be signed by each clinical trial subject or his or her legal representative and must monitor the clinical trial until completed.

A sponsor who wishes to conduct a clinical trial outside of the United States may, but need not, obtain FDA authorization to conduct the clinical trial under an IND. If a foreign clinical trial is not conducted under an IND, the FDA may nevertheless accept the results of the study in support of an NDA if the study was conducted in accordance with GCP requirements, and the FDA is able to validate the data through independent analysis and an onsite inspection if deemed necessary.

Human clinical trials involving biological products are typically conducted in three sequential phases that may overlap or be combined:

● Phase 1. The biological product is initially introduced into a small number of closely monitored healthy human volunteers and tested for safety. In the case of some products for severe or life-threatening diseases, especially when the product may be too inherently toxic to ethically administer to healthy volunteers, the initial human testing is often conducted in patients with the targeted disease.

● Phase 2. The biological product is evaluated in a limited patient population to identify possible adverse effects and safety risks, to preliminarily evaluate the efficacy of the product for specific targeted diseases and to determine dosage tolerance, optimal dosage and dosing schedule.

● Phase 3. Clinical trials generally enroll a large number of volunteers and are undertaken to further evaluate dosage, clinical efficacy, potency, and safety in an expanded patient population at geographically dispersed clinical trial sites. These clinical trials are intended to establish the overall risk to benefit ratio of the product and provide an adequate basis for product labeling.

During all phases of clinical development, regulatory agencies require extensive monitoring and auditing of all clinical activities, clinical data, and clinical trial investigators. Annual progress reports detailing the results of the clinical trials

must be submitted to the FDA. Written IND safety reports must be promptly submitted to the FDA and the investigators for serious and unexpected adverse events, any findings from other studies, tests in laboratory animals or in vitro testing that suggest a significant risk for human subjects, or any clinically important increase in the rate of a serious suspected adverse reaction over that listed in the protocol or investigator brochure. The sponsor also must notify the FDA of any unexpected fatal or life-threatening suspected adverse reaction within seven calendar days after the sponsor’s initial receipt of the information. Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical trials may not be completed successfully within any specified period, if at all. The FDA or the sponsor or its data safety monitoring board may suspend or terminate a clinical trial at any time on various grounds, including a finding that the research subjects are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk. Similarly, an IRB can suspend or terminate approval of a clinical trial at its institution if the clinical trial is not being conducted in accordance with the IRB’s requirements or if the biological product has been associated with unexpected serious harm to subjects.

Concurrently with clinical trials, companies usually complete additional studies and must also develop additional information about the physical characteristics of the biological product as well as finalize a process for manufacturing the product in commercial quantities in accordance with cGMP requirements. The manufacturing process must be capable of consistently producing quality batches of the product candidate and, among other criteria, the sponsor must develop methods for testing the identity, strength, quality, potency and purity of the final biological product. Additionally, appropriate packaging must be selected and tested, and stability studies must be conducted.

Many other countries in which we might choose to develop drugs or run clinical trials have similar rules and regulation. Although many of the issues discussed above with respect to the United States apply similarly in the context of the European Union or other foreign countries, the approval process varies between countries and jurisdictions and can involve additional product testing and additional administrative review periods. The time required to obtain approval in other countries and jurisdictions might differ from and be longer than that required to obtain FDA approval. Regulatory approval in one country or jurisdiction does not ensure regulatory approval in another, but a failure or delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one country or jurisdiction may negatively impact the regulatory process in others.

NDA/BLA:

Once clinical trials of a product candidate are completed, FDA approval of an NDA or BLA must be obtained before commercial marketing of the product. The NDA or BLA must include results of product development, laboratory and animal studies, human trials, information on the manufacture and composition of the product, proposed labeling and other relevant information. The FDA may grant deferrals for submission of data, or full or partial waivers. The testing and approval processes require substantial time and effort and there can be no assurance that the FDA will accept the NDA or BLA for filing and, even if filed, that any approval will be granted on a timely basis, if at all.

Post-Approval Requirements

Any products for which we receive FDA approvals will be subject to continuing regulation by the FDA, including, among other things, record-keeping requirements, reporting of adverse experiences with the product, providing the FDA with updated safety and efficacy information, product sampling and distribution requirements, and complying with FDA promotion and advertising requirements, which include, among others, standards for direct-to-consumer advertising, restrictions on promoting products for uses or in patient populations that are not described in the product’s approved uses, known as ‘off-label’ use, limitations on industry-sponsored scientific and educational activities, and requirements for promotional activities involving the internet.

Other U.S. Healthcare Laws and Compliance Requirements:

In the United States, our activities are potentially subject to regulation by various federal, state and local authorities in addition to the FDA, including but not limited to, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, other divisions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, for instance the Office of Inspector General, the U.S. Department of Justice, or DOJ, and individual U.S. Attorney offices within the DOJ, and state and local governments. For example, research, sales, marketing and scientific/educational grant programs must comply with the anti-fraud and abuse provisions

of the Social Security Act, the false claims laws, the physician payment transparency laws, the privacy and security provisions of HIPAA, as amended by Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (“HITECH”), and similar state laws, each as amended. Once commercialized, we could be liable to ensure full compliance with the law.

Coverage, Pricing and Reimbursement

Significant uncertainty exists as to the coverage and reimbursement status of any product candidates for which we obtain regulatory approval. This is dictated by third-party payors’ coverage and establish adequate reimbursement levels for such products. The marketability of any product candidate for which we receive regulatory approval for commercial sale may suffer if the government and third-party payors fail to provide adequate coverage and reimbursement.

Orphan Drug Act

Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may grant orphan designation to a drug or biologic intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is generally a disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States, and for which there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing and making available in the United States a drug for this type of disease or condition will be recovered from sales in the United States for that drug. Orphan drug designation must be requested before submitting an NDA or BLA. After the FDA grants orphan drug designation, the name of the sponsor, identity of the drug or biologic and its potential orphan use are disclosed publicly by the FDA. The orphan drug designation does not shorten the duration of the regulatory review or approval process, but does provide certain advantages, such as a waiver of Prescription Drug User Fee Act, or PDUFA, fees, enhanced access to FDA staff and potential waiver of pediatric research requirements.

If a product that has orphan drug designation subsequently receives the first FDA approval for the disease for which it has such designation, the product is entitled to orphan product exclusivity, which means that the FDA may not approve any other applications, including a full NDA, to market the same drug or biologic for the same indication for seven years, except in limited circumstances, such as a showing of clinical superiority to the product with orphan drug exclusivity. Orphan drug exclusivity does not prevent FDA from approving a different drug or biologic for the same disease or condition, or the same drug or biologic for a different disease or condition. Among the other benefits of orphan drug designation are tax credits for certain research and a waiver of the application user fee. A designated orphan drug may not receive orphan drug exclusivity if it is approved for a use that is broader than the indication for which it received orphan designation. In addition, exclusive marketing rights in the United States may be lost if the FDA later determines that the request for designation was materially defective or if the manufacturer is unable to assure sufficient quantities of the product to meet the needs of patients with the rare disease or condition.

Accelerated Approval

There are a variety of pathways under which applicants may seek expedited approval from FDA, including fast track, breakthrough therapy, priority review and accelerated approval. The FDA accelerated approval program provides for early approval of drugs based on a drug on a clinical trial(s) showing that the drug meets a surrogate or an intermediate clinical endpoint rather than a clinical benefit endpoint. Accelerated approval is possible for drugs for serious conditions that fill an unmet medical need.

A surrogate endpoint used for accelerated approval is a marker, such as a laboratory measurement, that is thought to predict clinical benefit, but is not itself a measure of clinical benefit. Likewise, an intermediate clinical endpoint is a measure of a therapeutic effect that is considered reasonably likely to predict the clinical benefit of a drug, such as an effect on irreversible morbidity and mortality. Because it sometimes can take many years for a drug trial to show a clinical benefit, the use of a surrogate endpoint or an intermediate clinical endpoint can significantly shorten the time required to complete clinical trials and obtain FDA approval.

If a drug receives an accelerated approval, the company that sponsored the application must conduct a post-approval trial to confirm the anticipated clinical benefit. These trials are known as Phase 4 or post-approval confirmatory trials. If the confirmatory trial shows that the drug actually provides a clinical benefit, then the FDA grants traditional approval for the

drug. Failure to conduct required post-approval studies, or confirm a clinical benefit during post-marketing studies, will allow the FDA to withdraw the drug from the market on an expedited basis. All promotional materials for drug candidates approved under accelerated regulations are subject to prior review by the FDA. If the confirmatory trial does not show that the drug provides clinical benefit, FDA has regulatory procedures in place that could lead to removing the drug from the market.

Healthcare Regulations and Healthcare Reform

Healthcare regulation and pricing (including drug pricing) is complex, extensive, and dynamic around the world. In the United States and some foreign jurisdictions, there have been, and likely will continue to be, a number of legislative and regulatory changes and proposed changes regarding the healthcare system directed at broadening the availability of healthcare, improving the quality of healthcare, and containing or lowering the cost of healthcare. We expect that there will continue to be a number of federal and state proposals to implement government pricing controls and limit the growth of healthcare costs.

We cannot predict what healthcare reform initiatives may be adopted in the future. Further federal, state and foreign legislative and regulatory developments are likely, and we expect ongoing initiatives to increase pressure on drug pricing. Such reforms could have an adverse effect on anticipated revenues from product candidates and may affect our overall financial condition and ability to develop product candidates.

We anticipate that current and future U.S. legislative healthcare reforms may result in additional downward pressure on the price that we receive for any approved product, if covered, and could seriously harm our business. Any reduction in reimbursement from Medicare and other government programs may result in a similar reduction in payments from private payors.

Data Privacy

In the ordinary course of business, we collect, receive, store, process, generate, use, transfer, disclose, make accessible, protect, secure, dispose of, transmit, and share (collectively, processing) personal data and other sensitive information, including proprietary and confidential business data, trade secrets, intellectual property, sensitive third-party data, and data we collect about trial participants in connection with clinical trials, which may include protected health information, genetic and genomic data, medical histories, demographic information, and other sensitive health-related data. Given the nature of our business as a biopharmaceutical company engaged in drug development, we process significant volumes of sensitive personal data across multiple jurisdictions where we conduct clinical trials and other operations. Our data processing activities subject us to numerous data privacy and security obligations, such as various laws, regulations, guidance, industry standards, external and internal privacy and security policies, contractual requirements, and other obligations relating to data privacy and security.

In the United States, federal, state, and local governments have enacted numerous data privacy and security laws, including data breach notification laws, personal data privacy laws, consumer protection laws (e.g., Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act), and other similar laws (e.g., wiretapping laws). For example, as further discussed above, HIPAA, as amended by HITECH, imposes specific requirements relating to the privacy, security, and transmission of individually identifiable protected health information. Additionally, FDA regulations, including 21 CFR Part 11, impose requirements regarding electronic records and electronic signatures that affect how we collect, maintain, and transmit clinical trial data, and noncompliance could affect our ability to rely on such data in regulatory submissions. In the past few years, California, Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, Utah and other states have enacted comprehensive privacy laws that impose certain obligations on covered businesses, including providing specific disclosures in privacy notices and affording residents with certain rights concerning their personal data. As applicable, such rights may include the right to access, correct, or delete certain personal data, and to opt-out of certain data processing activities, such as targeted advertising, profiling, and automated decision-making. The exercise of these rights may impact our business and ability to provide our products and services. Certain states also impose stricter requirements for processing certain personal data, including sensitive information, such as conducting data privacy impact assessments. These state laws allow for statutory fines for noncompliance. For example, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020 (“CPRA”), (collectively, “CCPA”) applies to personal information of consumers, business representatives, and employees who are California residents, and requires businesses to provide specific disclosures in privacy notices and

honor requests of such individuals to exercise certain privacy rights. The CCPA provides for fines of up to $7,500 per intentional violation and allows private litigants affected by certain data breaches to recover significant statutory damages. Although the CCPA and similar state laws exempt certain data processed in the context of clinical trials, such exemptions are limited in scope and do not extend to all personal data we process in connection with our clinical trial activities, including data relating to our employees, contractors, clinical trial site personnel, investigators, and business contacts. Similar laws are being considered in several other states, as well as at the federal and local levels, and we anticipate that more states will pass similar laws in the future. These developments further complicate compliance efforts and increase legal risk and compliance costs for us and the third parties upon whom we rely.

We may also be subject to new laws governing the privacy of consumer health data. For example, Washington’s My Health My Data Act (“MHMD Act”) broadly defines consumer health data, places restrictions on processing consumer health data (including imposing stringent requirements for consents), provides consumers certain rights with respect to their health data, and creates a private right of action to allow individuals to sue for violations of the law. Other states, including Nevada and Connecticut, have adopted or are considering similar consumer health data laws.

We may use AI) and ML technologies in various aspects of our operations, including drug discovery, clinical trial design, and data analysis. The use of AI and ML in our business may implicate data privacy and security obligations and emerging AI-specific regulations. For example, the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (the “EU AI Act”) establishes a risk-based regulatory framework for AI systems, including requirements for high-risk AI applications. Additionally, various U.S. states and federal agencies are considering or have adopted laws and guidance regarding the use of AI. Compliance with existing and emerging AI regulations may require us to modify our use of AI and ML technologies, implement additional governance and oversight measures, or limit our ability to use such technologies.

Outside the United States, an increasing number of laws, regulations, and industry standards govern data privacy and security. For example, the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (“EU GDPR”) and the United Kingdom’s GDPR (“UK GDPR”) impose strict requirements for processing personal data. For example, under the GDPR, companies may face temporary or definitive bans on data processing and other corrective actions; fines of up to 20 million Euros under the EU GDPR, 17.5 million pounds sterling under the UK GDPR or, in each case, 4% of annual global revenue, whichever is greater; or private litigation related to processing of personal data brought by classes of data subjects or consumer protection organizations authorized at law to represent their interests.

Additionally, under various privacy laws and other obligations, we may be required to obtain certain consents to process personal data. Our inability or failure to do so could result in adverse consequences, including class action litigation and mass arbitration demands.

In the ordinary course of business, we may transfer personal data from Europe and other jurisdictions to the United States or other countries. Europe and other jurisdictions have enacted laws requiring data to be localized or limiting the transfer of personal data to other countries. In particular, the European Economic Area (EEA) and the United Kingdom (UK) have significantly restricted the transfer of personal data to the United States and other countries whose privacy laws it generally believes are inadequate. Other jurisdictions may adopt similarly stringent interpretations of their data localization and cross-border data transfer laws. Although there are currently various mechanisms that may be used to transfer personal data from the EEA and UK to the United States in compliance with law, such as the EEA’s standard contractual clauses, the UK’s International Data Transfer Agreement / Addendum, and the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework and the UK extension thereto (which allow for transfers to relevant U.S.-based organizations who self-certify compliance and participate in the Framework), these mechanisms are subject to legal challenges, and there is no assurance that we can satisfy or rely on these measures to lawfully transfer personal data to the United States. If there is no lawful manner for us to transfer personal data from the EEA, the UK or other jurisdictions to the United States, or if the requirements for a legally-compliant transfer are too onerous, we could face significant adverse consequences, including the interruption or degradation of our operations, the need to relocate part of or all of our business or data processing activities to other jurisdictions (such as Europe) at significant expense, increased exposure to regulatory actions, substantial fines and penalties, the inability to transfer data and work with partners, vendors and other third parties, and injunctions against our processing or transferring of personal data necessary to operate our business. Additionally, companies that transfer personal data out of the EEA and UK to other jurisdictions, particularly to the United States, are subject to increased scrutiny from regulators, individual litigants, and activist groups. Some European regulators have ordered certain

companies to suspend or permanently cease certain transfers out of Europe for allegedly violating the GDPR’s cross-border data transfer limitations. For example, in May 2023, the Irish Data Protection Commission determined that a major social media company’s use of the standard contractual clauses to transfer personal data from Europe to the United States was insufficient and levied a 1.2 billion Euro fine against the company and prohibited the company from transferring personal data to the United States.

In addition, we are bound by contractual obligations related to data privacy and security, and our efforts to comply with such obligations may not be successful. For example, certain privacy laws, such as the GDPR and the CCPA, require our customers to impose specific contractual restrictions on their service providers. We publish privacy policies, marketing materials and other statement regarding data privacy and security. If these policies, materials or statements are found to be deficient, lacking in transparency, deceptive, unfair, or misrepresentative of our practices, we may be subject to investigation, enforcement actions by regulators or other adverse consequences.

Obligations related to data privacy and security are quickly changing, becoming increasingly stringent, and creating regulatory uncertainty. Additionally, these obligations may be subject to differing applications and interpretations, which may be inconsistent or conflict among jurisdictions. Preparing for and complying with these obligations requires us to devote significant resources, which may necessitate changes to our services, information technologies, systems, and practices and to those of any third parties that process personal data on our behalf. In addition, these obligations may require us to change our business model.

We may at times fail (or be perceived to have failed) in our efforts to comply with our data privacy and security obligations. Moreover, despite our efforts, our personnel or third parties on whom we rely may fail to comply with such obligations, which could negatively impact our business operations. If we or the third parties on which we rely fail, or are perceived to have failed, to address or comply with applicable data privacy and security obligations, we could face significant consequences, including but not limited to: government enforcement actions (e.g., investigations, fines, penalties, audits, inspections, and similar); litigation (including class-action claims) and mass arbitration demands; additional reporting requirements and/or oversight; bans on processing personal data; orders to destroy or not use personal data; and imprisonment of company officials.

In particular, plaintiffs have become increasingly more active in bringing privacy-related claims against companies, including class claims and mass arbitration demands. Some of these claims allow for the recovery of statutory damages on a per-violation basis, and, if viable, carry the potential for significant statutory damages, depending on the volume of data and the number of violations. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, or financial condition, including but not limited to: loss of customers; interruptions or stoppages in our business operations (including clinical trials); inability to process personal data or to operate in certain jurisdictions; limited ability to develop or commercialize our products; expenditure of time and resources to defend any claim or inquiry; adverse publicity; or substantial changes to our business model or operations. We cannot provide assurance that we will not experience incidents or claims that could have a material adverse effect on our business, and the costs of responding to and defending against data privacy and security claims or enforcement actions could be significant regardless of the outcome.

U.S. Patent-Term Extension

Depending upon the timing, duration and specifics of FDA approval of our current product candidates or any future product candidate, some of our U.S. patents may be eligible for limited patent term extension under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, commonly referred to as the Hatch Waxman Act. The Hatch Waxman Act permits extension of the patent term of up to five years as compensation for patent term lost during FDA regulatory review process. Patent term extension, however, cannot extend the remaining term of a patent beyond a total of 14 years from the product’s approval date. The patent term extension period is generally one half the time between the effective date of an IND and the submission date of an NDA plus the time between the submission date of an NDA and the approval of that application, except that the review period is reduced by any time during which the applicant failed to exercise due diligence. Only one patent applicable to an approved drug is eligible for the extension (and only those patent claims covering the approved drug, a method for using it or a method for manufacturing it may be extended), and the application for the extension must be submitted prior to the expiration of the patent. A patent that covers multiple products for which approval is sought can only be extended in connection with one of the approvals. The USPTO, in consultation with the FDA, reviews and approves the application for any patent term extension. In the future, we may apply for extension of a patent term for our currently owned patents to add patent life beyond its current expiration date, depending on the expected length of the clinical trials and other factors involved in the filing of the relevant NDA. However, there can be no assurance that the USPTO will grant us any requested patent term extension, either for the length we request or at all.

Rest of World Government Regulation

In addition to regulations in the United States, we will be subject to a variety of regulations in other jurisdictions governing, among other things, clinical trials and any commercial sales and distribution of our products. The cost of establishing a regulatory compliance system for numerous varying jurisdictions can be very significant. Although many of the issues discussed above with respect to the United States apply similarly in the context of the European Union and in other jurisdictions, the approval process varies between countries and jurisdictions and can involve additional product testing and additional administrative review periods. The time required to obtain approval in other countries and jurisdictions might differ from and be longer than that required to obtain FDA approval. Regulatory approval in one country or jurisdiction does not ensure regulatory approval in another, but a failure or delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one country or jurisdiction may negatively impact the regulatory process in others.

Whether or not we obtain FDA approval for a product, we must obtain the requisite approvals from comparable regulatory authorities in foreign countries prior to the commencement of clinical trials or marketing of the product in those countries. Certain countries outside of the United States have a similar process that requires the submission of a clinical trial application much like the IND prior to the commencement of human clinical trials. In the EU, for example, a clinical trial authorization application (“CTA”) must be submitted for each clinical protocol to each country’s national health authority and an independent ethics committee, much like the FDA and IRB, respectively. Once the CTA is accepted in accordance with a country’s requirements, the clinical trial may proceed.

The approval process varies from country to country and the time may be longer or shorter than that required for FDA approval. In addition, the requirements governing the conduct of clinical trials vary greatly from country to country. In all cases, the clinical trials are conducted in accordance with GCP the applicable regulatory requirements, and the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Australia

The pharmaceutical industry is one of the most highly regulated industries in Australia. The Australian government is heavily involved in the operation of the industry, through the registration of medicines and licensing of manufacturing facilities. In Australia, the relevant regulatory body responsible for the pharmaceutical industry is the Australian TGA. There is harmonization and collaboration between the TGA and the FDA. The TGA requires notification of all clinical trials via an electronic submission of a Clinical Trial Notification prior to commencing the clinical trial. The TGA operates according to the Commonwealth of Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 (Cth) (the “Australia TG Act”). Specifically, the Australia TG Act regulates the registration, listing, quality, safety, efficacy, promotion and sale of therapeutic goods, including pharmaceuticals, supplied in Australia.

Environmental, Health, and Safety Regulation

We are subject to numerous federal, state and local environmental, health and safety (“EHS”), laws and regulations relating to, among other matters, safe working conditions, product stewardship, environmental protection, and handling or disposition of products, including those governing the generation, storage, handling, use, transportation, release, and disposal of hazardous or potentially hazardous materials, medical waste, and infectious materials that may be handled by our research laboratories. Some of these laws and regulations also require us to obtain licenses or permits to conduct our operations. If we fail to comply with such laws or obtain and comply with the applicable permits, we could face substantial fines or possible revocation of our permits or limitations on our ability to conduct our operations. Certain of our development activities involve use of hazardous materials, and we believe we are in compliance with the applicable environmental laws, regulations, permits, and licenses. However, we cannot ensure EHS liabilities will not develop in the future. EHS laws and regulations are complex, change frequently and have tended to become more stringent over time. Although the costs to comply with applicable laws and regulations, have not been material, we cannot predict the impact on our business of new or amended laws or regulations or any changes in the way existing and future laws and regulations are interpreted or enforced, nor can we ensure we will be able to obtain or maintain any required licenses or permits.

Human Capital/Employees

As of August 27, 2026, we had 23 employees, all of which are full-time employees, in addition to two strategic consultants. Our employees are not represented by any union and are not the subject of a collective bargaining agreement. We consider our relations with our employees to be good.

We believe that our success depends upon our ability to attract, develop, retain and motivate key personnel. Our management and scientific teams possess considerable experience in drug discovery, research and development, manufacturing, clinical and regulatory affairs, and iBio directly benefits from this experience and industry knowledge.

We anticipate that we will need to identify, attract, train and retain other highly skilled personnel to pursue our development program. Hiring for such personnel is competitive, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to retain our key employees or attract, assimilate or retain the qualified personnel necessary for the development of our business.

We have no collective bargaining agreements with our employees and have not experienced any work stoppages. We consider our relations with our employees to be good. Management believes that it has sufficient human capital to operate its business successfully currently and will need to attract new talent to the organization in order to achieve its plans for growth.

Competitive Pay and Benefits. Our compensation programs are designed to align the compensation of our employees with our performance and to provide the proper incentives to attract, retain and motivate employees to achieve superior results. The structure of our compensation programs balances incentive earnings for both short-term and long-term performance. Specifically:

● we provide employee wages that are competitive and consistent with employee positions, skill levels, experience, knowledge and geographic location;

● we engage nationally recognized outside compensation and benefits consulting firms to independently evaluate the effectiveness of our executive compensation and benefit programs and to provide benchmarking against our peers within the industry;

● we align our executives’ long-term equity compensation with our shareholders’ interests by linking realizable pay with stock performance;

● annual increases and incentive compensation are based on merit, which is communicated to employees at the time of hiring and documented through our talent management process as part of our annual review procedures and upon internal transfer and/or promotion; and

● commencing January 1, 2018, we established the iBio, Inc. 401(k) Plan. Eligible employees may participate in the 401(k) Plan, whereby they may elect to make elective deferral contributions pursuant to a salary deduction agreement and receive matching contributions upon meeting age and length-of-service requirements. We will make a 100% matching contribution that is not in excess of 5% of an eligible employee’s compensation. In addition, we may make qualified non-elective contributions at our discretion.

Corporate Information

We were incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on April 17, 2008, under the name iBioPharma, Inc. We engaged in a merger with InB:Biotechnologies, Inc., a New Jersey corporation on July 25, 2008, and changed our name to iBio, Inc. on August 10, 2009.

Our principal executive offices are located at 11750 Sorrento Valley Road, Suite 200, San Diego, California 92121 and our telephone number is (979) 446-0027. Our website address is www.ibioinc.com. The information contained on, or accessible through, our website does not constitute part of this Annual Report. We have included our website address in this Annual Report solely as an inactive textual reference.

Available Information

Our website address is www.ibioinc.com. We file Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and other materials with the SEC. We are subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act and file or furnish reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. Such reports and other information filed by us with the SEC are available free of charge on our website at www.ibioinc.com. Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report, and you should not consider information on our website to be part of this Annual Report.

The SEC also maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov.