Alphabet advances AI to Gemini 3, ramps capex 74% to $91B, faces $37B in pending acquisitions
Filed February 4, 2026 · Period ending December 31, 2025 · Compared to 10-K Feb 4, 2025 · ~2 min read
Key Number Changes
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR →
We are continually innovating and building new products and features to help our users, partners, customers, and communities and have invested more than $150 billion in research and development in the last five years in support of these efforts.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
We continually innovate and build new products and features to help our users, partners, customers, and communities and have invested more than $200 billion in research and development in the last five years in support of these efforts.
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR →
As of December 31, 2024, Alphabet had 183,323 employees.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
As of December 31, 2025, Alphabet had 190,820 employees.
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR →
Revenues were $350.0 billion, an increase of 14% year over year, primarily driven by an increase in Google Services revenues of $32.4 billion, or 12%, and an increase in Google Cloud revenues of $10.1 billion, or 31%.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Revenues were $402.8 billion, an increase of 15% year over year, primarily driven by an increase in Google Services revenues of $37.8 billion, or 12%, and an increase in Google Cloud revenues of $15.5 billion, or 36%.
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR →
Capital expenditures, which primarily reflected investments in technical infrastructure, were $52.5 billion for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Capital expenditures, which primarily reflected investments in technical infrastructure, were $91.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2025.
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR →
Operating cash flow was $125.3 billion for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Operating cash flow was $164.7 billion for the year ended December 31, 2025.
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR →
Repurchases of Class A and Class C shares were $11.9 billion and $50.2 billion, respectively, totaling $62.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Repurchases of Class A and Class C shares were $6.5 billion and $38.9 billion, respectively, totaling $45.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2025.
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR →
As of December 31, 2024, we had material purchase commitments and other contractual obligations of $55.4 billion, of which $32.5 billion was short-term.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
As of December 31, 2025, the total for these commitments was $149.1 billion, of which $113.0 billion was short-term, mostly related to technical infrastructure and inventory orders.
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR →
Google Cloud operating income increased $4.4 billion from 2023 to 2024. The increase in operating income was primarily driven by an increase in revenues, partially offset by increases in usage costs for technical infrastructure as well as employee compensation expenses, largely driven by headcount growth.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Google Cloud operating income increased $7.8 billion from 2024 to 2025. The increase in operating income was primarily driven by an increase in revenues, partially offset by increases in usage costs for technical infrastructure and employee compensation expenses.
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR →
Other Bets operating loss increased $349 million from 2023 to 2024. The increase in operating loss was primarily due to an increase in expenses, largely driven by employee compensation expenses in addition to a combination of factors, none of which were individually significant.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Other Bets operating loss increased $3.1 billion from 2024 to 2025. The increase in operating loss was primarily driven by an increase in employee compensation expenses largely due to an increase in a valuation-based compensation charge related to Waymo.
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR →
OI&E, net increased $6.0 billion from 2023 to 2024 primarily due to an increase in net gains on equity securities and a decrease in net losses on foreign currency exchange. The net gains on equity securities were primarily due to net unrealized gains on non-marketable equity securities driven by fair value adjustments related to observable transactions, partially offset by a decrease in net unrealized gains on marketable equity securities due to market-driven changes.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
OI&E, net increased $22.4 billion from 2024 to 2025, primarily due to increases in net unrealized gains on equity securities resulting from fair value adjustments on non-marketable equity securities.
Prior filing · view on EDGAR →
Total face value of long-term debt 13,000 12,000
Current filing · view on EDGAR →
Total face value of long-term debt 12,000 49,085
Prior filing · view on EDGAR →
Total non-marketable securities $31,008 $37,982
Current filing · view on EDGAR →
Total non-marketable securities $37,982 $68,687
Prior filing · view on EDGAR →
Purchases of property and equipment (31,485) (32,251) (52,535)
Current filing · view on EDGAR →
Purchases of property and equipment (32,251) (52,535) (91,447)
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR →
As of December 31, 2024, we had $93.2 billion of remaining performance obligations (“revenue backlog”), primarily related to Google Cloud.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
As of December 31, 2025, we had $242.8 billion of remaining performance obligations (“revenue backlog"), primarily related to Google Cloud.
Current filing · view on EDGAR →
In September 2025, the EC announced its decision that Google had infringed European competition laws through "self-preferencing" practices on the buy-side and the sell-side relating to Google's advertising technology business. The EC decision imposed a €3.0 billion fine and directed Google to cease and desist the alleged "self-preferencing" practices. We appealed the ruling in November 2025. We recognized a charge of $3.5 billion in the third quarter of 2025, and we placed bank guarantees in the fourth quarter of 2025 in lieu of cash payment.
Prior filing · view on EDGAR →
European Commission fines(1) $9,525 $6,322
Current filing · view on EDGAR →
Accrued fines and settlements(1) $9,830 $15,594
Prior filing · verify on EDGAR →
Dividends and dividend equivalents declared ($0.60 per share)
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Dividends and dividend equivalents declared ($0.83 per share)
Key Changes
-
high
Capital expenditures surged from $52.5B (2024) to $91.4B (2025), a 74% increase driven by AI infrastructure buildout. Management signals a "significant increase" planned for 2026, likely exceeding $100B. Purchase commitments nearly tripled to $149B, reflecting massive orders for servers and network equipment.
-
high
Alphabet announced two major pending acquisitions: Wiz (cloud security) for $32B cash and Intersect (data center/energy infrastructure) for $4.8B plus assumed debt, both expected to close in 2026 pending regulatory approval. To fund expansion, the company issued $37.3B in new debt during 2025.
Notes: Business Combinations verify on EDGAR → -
high
Search antitrust case reached final judgment in December 2025, imposing restrictions on service distribution and requiring data sharing with competitors. Separately, ad tech case resulted in mixed April 2025 ruling finding publisher tools anticompetitive, with structural remedies proposed by DOJ. Both cases under appeal.
Notes: Legal Proceedings verify on EDGAR → -
high
Company upgraded AI platform from Gemini 2.0 to Gemini 3, now integrated across 15 products with 500M+ users. Five-year cumulative R&D investment increased from $150B to $200B. New AI Mode feature in Search enables complex multi-step queries, potentially changing monetization patterns versus traditional search.
Business: AI Model Generation view on EDGAR → -
high
Power, water, and land availability now material constraints on infrastructure scaling. Company entered $9.9B power purchase agreement (2027-2047) and provided $22.6B in credit support (guarantees and derivatives) to infrastructure counterparties. Energy supply shortages for AI compute flagged as limiting model training and Cloud service delivery.
Summary
Alphabet's 2025 filing reflects an aggressive AI infrastructure buildout that is reshaping the company's capital structure and operational profile. The 74% surge in capex to $91.4B—with management signaling further "significant increase" in 2026—represents the most dramatic acceleration in the company's history, driven by data center expansion and AI compute capacity. This is paired with $37B in new debt issuance and $37B in pending acquisitions (Wiz and Intersect), marking a strategic pivot toward owning critical cloud security and infrastructure assets rather than relying solely on third-party arrangements.The regulatory landscape has hardened materially. The Search antitrust case moved from pending remedies to a final judgment requiring data sharing with competitors and distribution restrictions, while the ad tech case resulted in a mixed ruling with structural remedies on the table. A new $3.5B EC fine for advertising technology practices adds to legal costs. Despite these headwinds, the business delivered strong results: revenues grew 15% to $402.8B, Google Cloud accelerated to 36% growth with operating income doubling to $13.9B, and operating cash flow increased 31% to $164.7B, aided by favorable U.S. tax law changes allowing immediate R&D expensing.
Investors should watch three dynamics next quarter: (1) whether 2026 capex guidance exceeds $100B as implied, (2) regulatory approval progress on the Wiz and Intersect acquisitions, and (3) early revenue impact from AI Mode in Search, which management acknowledges may "monetize differently" than traditional search and could pressure near-term ad growth rates even as it positions the company for long-term AI leadership.
Section-by-Section Diff
Business
~4,700 words (-22% vs prior)Updated AI model to Gemini 3, increased R&D spend to $200B, added new product features, revised Google Cloud offerings, and updated Other Bets revenue sources.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
In 2023, we took a significant step on our journey to make AI more helpful for everyone with the introduction of Gemini, our natively multimodal AI model. In 2024, we launched Gemini 2.0, our most capable model yet.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Over the last decade, our research teams have pushed the boundaries of AI forward, which is displayed through Gemini 3, our most intelligent AI model yet. Designed to deliver advanced multimodal understanding, Gemini 3 represents our most capable iteration of agentic and generative coding technologies.
The company has advanced from Gemini 2.0 (baseline) to Gemini 3 (current), describing it as their "most intelligent AI model yet" with enhanced agentic and generative coding capabilities. This represents a full generation upgrade in their core AI technology platform.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
We are continually innovating and building new products and features to help our users, partners, customers, and communities and have invested more than $150 billion in research and development in the last five years in support of these efforts.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
We continually innovate and build new products and features to help our users, partners, customers, and communities and have invested more than $200 billion in research and development in the last five years in support of these efforts.
Five-year cumulative R&D investment increased from $150 billion to $200 billion, a $50 billion increase representing approximately 33% growth. This signals significantly higher capital intensity in research and development activities.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Today, all seven of our two billion-user products — Android, Chrome, Gmail, Maps, Play Store, Search, and YouTube — are using Gemini.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Today, all 15 of our half-billion-user products — including seven with two billion users — use our Gemini models.
The company now reports 15 products with over 500 million users (up from just reporting the seven 2-billion-user products), indicating broader product portfolio scale and Gemini integration across more services.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Our technical infrastructure allows us to use and offer our customers a range of AI accelerator options, including specialized Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) and our own custom-built Tensor Processing Units (TPUs), such as Ironwood, our seventh-generation TPU.
New disclosure identifies Ironwood as the seventh-generation TPU and explicitly mentions GPU offerings alongside TPUs, providing more granular detail on AI infrastructure capabilities and competitive positioning in AI compute.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Supporting these businesses, we have centralized certain AI-related research and development which is reported in Alphabet-level activities.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Supporting these businesses, we have centralized certain AI-related research and development focused on advanced research in AI and developing the frontier models that serve our businesses, which is reported in Alphabet-level activities.
The company now explicitly describes centralized AI R&D as focused on "advanced research in AI and developing the frontier models," clarifying the strategic scope and purpose of Alphabet-level AI investments.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
AI Mode allows users to ask more nuanced questions that might have previously taken multiple searches, using Gemini’s advanced reasoning, thinking, and multimodal capabilities.
New AI Mode feature disclosed for Search, enabling more complex multi-step queries in a single interaction. This represents a material product evolution beyond the AI Overviews feature mentioned in both filings.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
This potential is reflected in our latest generation of devices, such as the new Pixel 9 series and the Pixel Watch 3.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
This potential is reflected in our latest generation of devices, such as the new Pixel 10 series and the Pixel Watch 4.
Hardware product line advanced one full generation: Pixel 10 series and Pixel Watch 4 replace Pixel 9 and Watch 3, indicating continued annual refresh cycle in consumer devices segment.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
consumer subscriptions, which primarily include revenues from YouTube services, such as YouTube TV, YouTube Music and Premium, and NFL Sunday Ticket, as well as Google One;
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
consumer subscriptions, which primarily include revenues from YouTube services, such as YouTube TV, YouTube Music and Premium, and NFL Sunday Ticket, as well as Google One, which offers access to our most capable Gemini models;
Google One subscription service now explicitly positioned as offering "access to our most capable Gemini models," adding AI access as a key value proposition for the subscription tier.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Applications: offers a broad applications portfolio, including Gemini for Google Cloud and Gemini for Google Workspace, as well as purpose-built agents for Search and our Customer Engagement Suite.
Current filing · view on EDGAR →
Agents: ◦Gemini Enterprise: empowers teams to discover, create, share, and run AI agents all in one secure platform, bringing the best of Google AI to employees through an intuitive chat interface, helping to automate workflows and drive smarter business outcomes. ◦Gemini for Google Workspace: brings our AI-powered agents into Gmail, Docs, Sheets, and more to help users write, organize, visualize, accelerate workflows, and have more productive meetings.
Google Cloud product taxonomy restructured: "Applications" category replaced with "Agents" category, splitting Gemini Enterprise and Gemini for Workspace into distinct offerings with more detailed positioning around agent-based workflows.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
AI-optimized Infrastructure: provides open, reliable, and scalable compute, networking, and storage to enable customers to run workloads anywhere — on our Cloud, at the edge, or in their data centers. It can be used to migrate and modernize IT systems and to train and serve various types of AI models.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
AI-optimized Infrastructure: runs on our Cloud, at the edge, or in customers' data centers. It can be used to migrate and modernize information technology (IT) systems and to train and serve various types of AI models. Our AI infrastructure delivers cost-performance for AI workloads. We offer a range of AI accelerators, including our custom TPUs and specialized GPUs, as well as AI-optimized storage offerings, and efficient AI software.
Infrastructure description now emphasizes "cost-performance for AI workloads" and explicitly lists TPUs, GPUs, storage, and software components, shifting from generic "open, reliable, scalable" positioning to performance-focused differentiation.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Developer Platform: provides developers, through the Vertex AI platform, the ability to train, tune, augment, test, and deploy applications using Gemini and other leading generative AI models. We offer widely used first-party, third-party, and open models along with services such as vector search, grounding, and distillation to further improve the cost and quality of models.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Developer Platform: delivers a fully managed AI development platform, through Vertex AI, for accessing, tuning, augmenting, and deploying custom models and agents, helping customers build applications with more than 200 foundation models, including our Gemini family, third-party, and open models.
Developer platform now quantifies model catalog at "more than 200 foundation models" and adds "agents" to deployment capabilities, while removing specific technical services (vector search, grounding, distillation) from the description.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Cybersecurity: provides AI powered cybersecurity solutions to help customers analyze, detect, protect, and respond to a broad range of cybersecurity threats, to further strengthen security outcomes, prioritize which threats to investigate, and identify attack paths, as well as accelerate resolution of cybersecurity threats.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Cybersecurity: provides AI-powered threat intelligence and cybersecurity solutions to help customers detect, analyze, protect against, and respond to a broad range of cybersecurity threats.
Cybersecurity description simplified and now leads with "threat intelligence" as a distinct capability. Removed detailed workflow language about prioritizing threats and identifying attack paths, condensing to higher-level positioning.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Isomorphic Labs is reimagining the drug discovery process from first principles, applying AI to accelerate the development of new medicines.
New disclosure of Isomorphic Labs as an Other Bets business focused on AI-driven drug discovery, representing a material expansion into pharmaceutical/biotech applications of AI technology.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Revenues from Other Bets are generated primarily from the sale of healthcare-related services, and internet services.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Revenues from Other Bets are generated primarily from the sale of autonomous transportation and internet services.
Other Bets revenue mix shifted from "healthcare-related services" to "autonomous transportation" as the primary non-internet revenue source, indicating Waymo's growing commercial scale relative to health-tech ventures.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Alphabet’s investment in the portfolio of Other Bets includes businesses that are at various stages of development, ranging from those in the R&D phase to those that are in the beginning stages of commercialization. Our goal is for them to become thriving, successful businesses.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Alphabet’s investment in the portfolio of Other Bets includes businesses that are at various stages of development, ranging from those in the research and development phase, such as X, our moonshot factory focused on developing breakthrough technologies, to those that are scaling commercialization, such as Waymo, which is expanding to more cities domestically, entering international markets, and further scaling operations.
Other Bets description now explicitly positions Waymo as "scaling commercialization" with domestic expansion and international entry, upgrading from "beginning stages of commercialization" language and removing aspirational "goal" framing.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
developers and providers of AI products and services;
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
AI model developers and providers of AI products and services;
Competition section now explicitly identifies "AI model developers" as a distinct competitive category, reflecting the emergence of foundation model providers as direct competitors.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Particularly with regard to AI; competition; consumer protection; content moderation; data privacy and security; news publications; and sustainability and other social matters
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Particularly with regard to AI; competition; consumer protection; content moderation, including access restrictions for minors; data privacy and security; intellectual property; news publications; and sustainability and other social matters
Government regulation section now explicitly calls out "access restrictions for minors" as a specific content moderation regulatory focus area, and adds "intellectual property" as a new regulatory topic.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Our compliance with these laws and regulations may be onerous and could, individually or in the aggregate, increase our cost of doing business, make our products and services less useful, limit our ability to pursue certain business practices or offer certain products and services, cause us to change our business models and operations, affect our competitive position relative to our peers, and/or otherwise harm our business, reputation, financial condition, and operating results.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Our compliance with these laws and regulations may be onerous and could, individually or in the aggregate, increase our cost of doing business, make our products and services less useful, limit our ability to pursue certain business practices or offer certain products and services (either in certain geographies or at all), cause us to change our business models and operations, affect our competitive position relative to our peers, or otherwise harm our business, reputation, financial condition, and operating results.
Regulatory impact language now explicitly acknowledges potential geographic restrictions ("either in certain geographies or at all"), indicating heightened awareness of jurisdiction-specific product limitations.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
As of December 31, 2024, Alphabet had 183,323 employees.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
As of December 31, 2025, Alphabet had 190,820 employees.
Headcount increased by 7,497 employees year-over-year (approximately 4.1% growth), indicating continued workforce expansion despite broader tech industry layoffs in recent years.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
We have work councils and statutory employee representation obligations in certain countries, and we are committed to supporting protected labor rights, maintaining an open culture, and listening to all employees. Supporting healthy and open dialogue is central to how we work, and we communicate information about the company through multiple internal channels to our employees.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
We have work councils and statutory employee representation obligations in certain countries, and we are committed to supporting protected labor rights, maintaining an open culture, and listening to our employees.
Removed language about "listening to all employees" (now just "our employees") and deleted the sentence emphasizing "healthy and open dialogue" and "multiple internal channels," representing a subtle softening of employee engagement messaging.
Removed from previous filing · view on EDGAR →
Our environmental strategy has two key pillars, supported by our dedication to accessible information and technological innovation:
•Our products: We are empowering people with information about the environmental impacts of their choices.
•Our operations: We are working to drive sustainability and efficiency across our operations and value chain.
Through our products, we have an aspiration to help individuals, cities, and other partners collectively reduce one gigaton of their carbon equivalent emissions annually by 2030.
In 2021, we set an ambitious goal to reach net-zero emissions across all of our operations and value chain by 2030. To make progress toward this effort, we aim to reduce 50% of our combined Scope 1, Scope 2 (market-based), and Scope 3 absolute emissions (compared to our 2019 base year) by 2030, and we plan to invest in nature-based and technology-based carbon removal solutions to neutralize our remaining emissions.
Our primary approach to reducing our Scope 2 emissions is through the procurement of carbon-free energy (CFE). In 2020, we set a goal to run on 24/7 CFE every hour of every day on every grid where we operate by 2030. In 2023, we began implementing our carbon removals strategy, and we have begun establishing impactful partnerships and have started contracting for carbon removal credits.
Achieving net-zero emissions and 24/7 CFE by 2030 are extremely ambitious goals. We also know that our path to net-zero emissions will not be easy or linear. Some of our plans may take years to deliver results, particularly where they involve building new large-scale infrastructure with long lead times. Our approach will continue to evolve and will require us to navigate significant uncertainty, including the uncertainty around the future environmental impact of AI, which is complex and difficult to predict. In addition, solutions for some key global challenges do not currently exist, and will depend heavily on the development and improvement of new technologies by us and by the energy sector. As our business and industry continue to evolve, we expect our total GHG emissions to rise before dropping toward our absolute emissions reduction target.
For additional information about risks and uncertainties applicable to our work on sustainability and efficiency, see Item 1A Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Entire "Ongoing Commitment to Sustainability" section removed, including net-zero 2030 goals, 24/7 carbon-free energy targets, one-gigaton emissions reduction aspiration, and acknowledgment that AI's environmental impact creates uncertainty. This is a lifecycle removal — the baseline contained detailed forward-looking sustainability commitments and progress updates that are no longer featured in the business section narrative. The underlying sustainability work likely continues and may be reported elsewhere (ESG reports, risk factors), but the removal from the core business description reduces visibility of these commitments in the primary business overview.
Removed from previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
We believe AI has the potential to solve important societal, scientific, and engineering challenges. For example, in 2020, Google DeepMind’s AlphaFold system solved a 50-year-old protein folding challenge, and in 2024, we introduced AlphaFold 3, built on the previous models, to predict the structure and interactions of all the molecules in life's processes.
Removed specific AlphaFold example and broader framing about AI solving "societal, scientific, and engineering challenges." This is a lifecycle removal — AlphaFold 3 was announced in 2024 and featured as a recent achievement in the baseline filing; by 2025, it's integrated into ongoing operations (now reflected through Isomorphic Labs disclosure) and no longer highlighted as a standalone recent accomplishment.
Removed from previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
We are using Gemini 2.0 in new research prototypes, including Project Astra, which explores the future capabilities of a universal AI assistant and Project Mariner, an early prototype capable of taking actions in Chrome as an experimental extension.
Removed references to Project Astra and Project Mariner research prototypes. This is a lifecycle removal — these were experimental prototypes highlighted in the baseline as examples of cutting-edge research; by the current filing, they are either integrated into products, discontinued, or no longer newsworthy as standalone research initiatives.
Removed from previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Our acquisitions of YouTube and Android and subsequent launch of Chrome have matured into major platforms for digital video and mobile devices and a safer, popular browser.
Removed historical context about YouTube, Android, and Chrome acquisitions/launches as examples of successful moonshots. This is a lifecycle removal — these platforms are now core established businesses (20+ years for some), and the historical acquisition framing is no longer relevant to current business description.
Removed from previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
We first expanded from traditional desktop browsers into mobile web search, making it easier to navigate on smaller screens. As new types of content surfaced on the internet, Universal Search made it possible to search multiple content types, like news, images, videos, and more, to deliver rich, relevant results. The introduction of new search modalities, like voice and visual search, made it easier for people to express their curiosity in natural and intuitive ways. We took that a step further with multisearch, which lets people search with text and images at the same time.
Removed detailed historical progression of Search features (mobile web, Universal Search, voice/visual search, multisearch). This is a lifecycle removal — these are now established baseline capabilities, and the historical evolution narrative is less relevant than current AI-driven features like AI Mode.
Removed from previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
We are now using Gemini customized for Google Search to provide our users an improved Search experience, and AI Overviews has been released in more than one hundred countries, reaching more than one billion users.
Removed specific deployment metrics for AI Overviews (100+ countries, 1 billion+ users). This is a lifecycle removal — the baseline highlighted AI Overviews rollout as a recent achievement; by the current filing, it's an established feature and the deployment announcement is no longer current news.
Removed from previous filing · view on EDGAR →
People are consuming many forms of digital content, including watching videos, streaming TV, playing games, listening to music, reading books, and using apps.
Removed detailed enumeration of content formats (videos, streaming TV, games, music, books, apps). Current filing uses condensed language "watching long and short form videos and podcasts, streaming TV, playing games, listening to music, reading books, and using apps" — this is minor editorial tightening, not a material change.
Removed from previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
AI has been used in Google Workspace for years to improve grammar, efficiency, security, and more with features like Smart Reply, Smart Compose, and malware and phishing protection in Gmail.
Removed historical context about pre-Gemini AI features in Workspace (Smart Reply, Smart Compose, malware protection). This is a lifecycle removal — these are now baseline features, and the current filing focuses on Gemini-powered capabilities rather than legacy AI implementations.
Removed from previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
digital assistant providers.
Removed "digital assistant providers" from competition list. This may reflect consolidation of this category into "AI model developers and providers of AI products and services" or a strategic de-emphasis of standalone digital assistants as a competitive threat.
Removed from previous filing · view on EDGAR →
even as trends in advertising mediums and user preferences change
Removed phrase acknowledging changing advertising trends and user preferences from the advertising competition description. Minor editorial change with no material impact.
Controls
~500 words (-1% vs prior)Controls section unchanged except for routine date updates and committee name shortened from 'Audit and Compliance Committee' to 'Audit Committee'.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Management reviewed the results of its assessment with our Audit and Compliance Committee.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Management reviewed the results of its assessment with our Audit Committee.
The committee name changed from 'Audit and Compliance Committee' to 'Audit Committee', dropping the 'Compliance' designation. This could reflect a board restructuring or reallocation of compliance oversight responsibilities.
MD&A
~10,500 words (-9% vs prior)2025 MD&A reflects 15% revenue growth, $91.4B capex, pending $32B Wiz and $4.8B Intersect acquisitions, $37.3B debt issuance, and $3.5B EC fine.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Supporting these businesses, we have centralized certain AI-related research and development focused on advanced research in AI and developing the frontier models that serve our businesses, which is reported in Alphabet-level activities.
Alphabet now reports centralized AI research and development as a distinct Alphabet-level activity, separate from segment operations. This organizational change reflects the company's strategic focus on AI infrastructure and frontier model development that supports all business units. The baseline filing did not describe this centralized AI R&D structure.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
As we continue to incorporate AI into our products and services, such as with AI Overviews and AI Mode in Search, and with enterprise AI solutions on our Google Cloud Platform, we may monetize differently than our historical consumer and enterprise offerings which could affect revenue growth rates and margin trends.
The company now explicitly names AI Overviews and AI Mode as specific AI features integrated into Search, acknowledging these may monetize differently than traditional search. This is a new disclosure about product evolution and potential monetization impacts. The baseline filing discussed AI in Search generically but did not name these specific features.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
We expect to increase, relative to 2024, our investment in our technical infrastructure, including servers, network equipment, and data centers, to support the growth of our business and our long-term initiatives, in particular in support of AI products and services.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
We invested heavily in capital expenditures in 2025 and in 2026, we expect to significantly increase, relative to 2025, our investment in our technical infrastructure, including servers and network equipment, and data centers.
The company now signals a "significant increase" in 2026 capex relative to 2025's $91.4B, whereas the baseline used the softer "increase" language for 2025 relative to 2024's $52.5B. Given 2025 capex nearly doubled from 2024, the "significant increase" language for 2026 suggests continued aggressive infrastructure spending, likely exceeding $100B.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Additionally, in 2025, we provided credit support, such as through backstops and guarantees, to certain infrastructure related counterparties and may continue to provide additional credit support in the future.
Alphabet disclosed for the first time that it provided credit support (backstops and guarantees) to infrastructure-related counterparties in 2025 and may continue doing so. This reflects new off-balance-sheet commitments related to infrastructure buildout, likely tied to data center and energy projects. The baseline filing did not mention this activity.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
In 2025, we entered into definitive agreements to acquire Wiz, a leading cloud security platform, for $32.0 billion, and Intersect, a provider of data center and energy infrastructure solutions, for $4.8 billion in cash plus the assumption of debt. Both acquisitions are expected to close in 2026, subject to customary closing conditions, including the receipt of regulatory approvals.
Alphabet announced two major pending acquisitions: Wiz for $32.0B (cloud security) and Intersect for $4.8B plus assumed debt (data center and energy infrastructure). These are the largest disclosed M&A transactions in the company's recent history and signal strategic priorities in cloud security and infrastructure capacity. Both are expected to close in 2026 pending regulatory approval.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
In 2025, we issued senior unsecured notes for net proceeds of $37.3 billion, to be used for general corporate purposes.
Alphabet raised $37.3B in debt during 2025, a substantial increase in leverage. The baseline filing showed $11.9B in outstanding notes as of end-2024; the current filing shows $48.5B outstanding as of end-2025. This debt issuance likely supports the pending acquisitions, capex ramp, and general corporate flexibility.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Other Bets operating loss of $7.5 billion for the year ended December 31, 2025 included a $2.1 billion employee compensation charge recognized in the fourth quarter for Waymo, primarily reflected in research and development expenses, based on estimated stock valuation. In February 2026, Waymo announced an investment round of $16.0 billion, the significant majority of which was funded by Alphabet.
Alphabet recorded a $2.1B valuation-based compensation charge for Waymo in Q4 2025, reflecting increased stock valuation ahead of a $16.0B investment round (mostly Alphabet-funded) announced in February 2026. This is a non-cash charge tied to Waymo's rising valuation and signals continued heavy investment in autonomous transportation. The baseline filing did not disclose a comparable Waymo-specific charge.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Changes to U.S. tax law enacted on July 4, 2025, allow, among other things, for immediate expensing of domestic research and experimentation costs and accelerated depreciation on eligible capital expenditures, the effects of which are included in operating cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2025.
New U.S. tax legislation enacted July 4, 2025 allows immediate expensing of domestic R&D costs and accelerated depreciation on capex, both of which improve operating cash flow. This is a favorable tax development that partially offsets the cash impact of the company's elevated capex and R&D spending. The baseline filing did not reference this legislation.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Revenues were $350.0 billion, an increase of 14% year over year, primarily driven by an increase in Google Services revenues of $32.4 billion, or 12%, and an increase in Google Cloud revenues of $10.1 billion, or 31%.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Revenues were $402.8 billion, an increase of 15% year over year, primarily driven by an increase in Google Services revenues of $37.8 billion, or 12%, and an increase in Google Cloud revenues of $15.5 billion, or 36%.
2025 revenues reached $402.8B (up 15% YoY), with Google Cloud growing 36% to $58.7B and Google Services growing 12% to $342.7B. This compares to 2024 revenues of $350.0B (up 14% YoY). Cloud growth accelerated from 31% to 36%, while Services growth held steady at 12%. Operating margin remained flat at 32%.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Capital expenditures, which primarily reflected investments in technical infrastructure, were $52.5 billion for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Capital expenditures, which primarily reflected investments in technical infrastructure, were $91.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2025.
Capital expenditures surged from $52.5B in 2024 to $91.4B in 2025, a 74% increase. This reflects the company's aggressive buildout of AI-related technical infrastructure (servers, network equipment, data centers). Depreciation also increased from $15.3B to $21.1B. The company signals further "significant increase" in 2026 capex.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Operating cash flow was $125.3 billion for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Operating cash flow was $164.7 billion for the year ended December 31, 2025.
Operating cash flow increased from $125.3B in 2024 to $164.7B in 2025, a 31% increase. This strong cash generation, aided by favorable U.S. tax law changes allowing immediate R&D expensing, supports the company's elevated capex and acquisition activity. Free cash flow (OCF minus capex) was approximately $73.3B in 2025 versus $72.8B in 2024.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
General and administrative expenses increased $7.3 billion from 2024 to 2025, primarily driven by an increase in expenses related to legal and other matters of $6.2 billion, largely the result of the $3.5 billion EC fine accrued in the third quarter of 2025 and a $1.4 billion legal accrual made in the second quarter of 2025.
Alphabet accrued a $3.5B European Commission fine in Q3 2025 and a separate $1.4B legal accrual in Q2 2025, together driving a $6.2B increase in legal and other expenses. The baseline filing discussed the 2017 EC fine payment ($3.0B paid in Q3 2024) but did not reference a new $3.5B fine. This new fine is not further detailed in the current filing.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Repurchases of Class A and Class C shares were $11.9 billion and $50.2 billion, respectively, totaling $62.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Repurchases of Class A and Class C shares were $6.5 billion and $38.9 billion, respectively, totaling $45.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2025.
Share repurchases declined from $62.0B in 2024 to $45.4B in 2025, a 27% decrease. This reduction likely reflects capital allocation priorities shifting toward capex, acquisitions (Wiz, Intersect), and debt issuance. The company still has $69.5B remaining under its repurchase authorization as of end-2025.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
As of December 31, 2024, we had 183,323 employees.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
As of December 31, 2025, we had 190,820 employees.
Headcount increased from 183,323 at end-2024 to 190,820 at end-2025, a net addition of approximately 7,500 employees (4% growth). This follows the 2023 workforce reduction and signals resumed hiring to support AI initiatives and business growth.
Previous filing · view on EDGAR →
As of December 31, 2024, we have entered into leases that have not yet commenced with future short-term and long-term lease payments of $773 million and $6.5 billion, respectively.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
As of December 31, 2025, we have entered into leases primarily related to data centers that have not yet commenced with short-term and long-term future lease payments of $5.8 billion and $52.7 billion, respectively. These leases will commence between 2026 and 2031 with non-cancelable lease terms primarily between one and 25 years.
Uncommenced lease commitments surged from $7.3B at end-2024 to $58.5B at end-2025, an eightfold increase. These are primarily data center leases commencing 2026-2031 with terms up to 25 years. This reflects the company's aggressive expansion of data center capacity to support AI infrastructure, complementing the capex ramp.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
In January 2026, we executed a power purchase agreement which we expect to be accounted for as a lease resulting in future payments depending on certain agreement terms of $9.9 billion between 2027 and 2047. If certain contractual conditions for the project are not met, we would instead make a one-time payment of approximately $3.5 billion and assume ownership of the power generating assets.
Alphabet entered a 20-year power purchase agreement in January 2026 with $9.9B in future payments (2027-2047), or a $3.5B buyout option if project conditions aren't met. This is a new long-term energy commitment, likely tied to data center power needs for AI infrastructure. The baseline filing did not disclose this agreement.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
As of December 31, 2024, we had material purchase commitments and other contractual obligations of $55.4 billion, of which $32.5 billion was short-term.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
As of December 31, 2025, the total for these commitments was $149.1 billion, of which $113.0 billion was short-term, mostly related to technical infrastructure and inventory orders.
Purchase commitments nearly tripled from $55.4B at end-2024 to $149.1B at end-2025, with short-term commitments rising from $32.5B to $113.0B. This reflects massive orders for technical infrastructure (servers, network equipment) and inventory to support the AI infrastructure buildout. The scale of the increase is unprecedented in the company's disclosed history.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
As of December 31, 2025, we provided backstops in the form of financial guarantees and credit derivatives with maximum potential amount of future payments of $5.7 billion and $16.9 billion, respectively.
Alphabet disclosed $5.7B in financial guarantees and $16.9B in credit derivatives as of end-2025, totaling $22.6B in off-balance-sheet credit support. These are likely tied to infrastructure-related counterparties (data centers, energy projects). The baseline filing did not disclose these instruments.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Google Cloud operating income increased $4.4 billion from 2023 to 2024. The increase in operating income was primarily driven by an increase in revenues, partially offset by increases in usage costs for technical infrastructure as well as employee compensation expenses, largely driven by headcount growth.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Google Cloud operating income increased $7.8 billion from 2024 to 2025. The increase in operating income was primarily driven by an increase in revenues, partially offset by increases in usage costs for technical infrastructure and employee compensation expenses.
Google Cloud operating income grew from $6.1B in 2024 to $13.9B in 2025, a $7.8B increase (128% growth). This compares to a $4.4B increase in 2024. Cloud is scaling profitably despite higher infrastructure and compensation costs, with operating margin expanding as the business matures.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Other Bets operating loss increased $349 million from 2023 to 2024. The increase in operating loss was primarily due to an increase in expenses, largely driven by employee compensation expenses in addition to a combination of factors, none of which were individually significant.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Other Bets operating loss increased $3.1 billion from 2024 to 2025. The increase in operating loss was primarily driven by an increase in employee compensation expenses largely due to an increase in a valuation-based compensation charge related to Waymo.
Other Bets operating loss widened from $4.4B in 2024 to $7.5B in 2025, a $3.1B increase driven primarily by the $2.1B Waymo valuation-based compensation charge. This compares to a $349M increase in 2024. The Waymo charge reflects the unit's rising valuation ahead of the $16B investment round.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
OI&E, net increased $6.0 billion from 2023 to 2024 primarily due to an increase in net gains on equity securities and a decrease in net losses on foreign currency exchange. The net gains on equity securities were primarily due to net unrealized gains on non-marketable equity securities driven by fair value adjustments related to observable transactions, partially offset by a decrease in net unrealized gains on marketable equity securities due to market-driven changes.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
OI&E, net increased $22.4 billion from 2024 to 2025, primarily due to increases in net unrealized gains on equity securities resulting from fair value adjustments on non-marketable equity securities.
Other income and expense increased from $7.4B in 2024 to $29.8B in 2025, driven by $24.1B in net gains on equity securities (primarily unrealized gains on non-marketable equity securities). This compares to $3.7B in equity gains in 2024. The 2025 gains likely reflect mark-to-market adjustments on private company investments.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
The OECD is coordinating negotiations among more than 140 countries with the goal of achieving consensus around substantial changes to international tax policies, including the implementation of a minimum global effective tax rate of 15%. Some countries have already implemented the legislation effective January 1, 2024, and we expect others to follow, however this did not have a material effect on our income tax provision for the 2024 fiscal year.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
In January 2026, the OECD introduced new guidance including a "Side-by-Side Safe Harbor" which, if elected, exempts U.S. domestic operations from being taxed by global minimum tax rules. However, it does not exempt foreign subsidiaries from local minimum tax requirements if implemented. As more countries enact these global minimum tax rules, our effective tax rate and cash tax payments could increase.
The OECD introduced a Side-by-Side Safe Harbor in January 2026 that could exempt U.S. domestic operations from global minimum tax, but foreign subsidiaries remain exposed. Alphabet notes this could increase effective tax rate and cash taxes as more countries adopt the rules. The baseline filing noted no material 2024 impact; the current filing signals potential future impact.
Removed from previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
We use non-GAAP constant currency revenues ("constant currency revenues") and non-GAAP percentage change in constant currency revenues ("percentage change in constant currency revenues") for financial and operational decision-making and as a means to evaluate period-to-period comparisons. We believe the presentation of results on a constant currency basis in addition to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) results helps improve the ability to understand our performance, because it excludes the effects of foreign currency volatility that are not indicative of our core operating results.
The current filing no longer includes the detailed constant currency revenue reconciliation table and methodology explanation that appeared in the baseline filing. The baseline showed total constant currency revenues of $352.7B for 2024 (15% growth) versus reported $350.0B (14% growth). This removal is a lifecycle disclosure change — the company provided the reconciliation in the baseline to explain FX headwinds in 2024; with FX impacts less material in 2025, the detailed reconciliation was dropped.
Removed from previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Employee severance and related charges for the year ended December 31, 2024 were $1.0 billion, a decrease of $1.1 billion as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. Office space charges, including accelerated rent and accelerated depreciation, for the year ended December 31, 2024 were $796 million, a decrease of $1.3 billion as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. Substantially all of these charges were included in Alphabet-level activities.
The current filing no longer separately discloses employee severance and office space optimization charges, which were highlighted in the baseline as one-time restructuring items totaling $1.8B in 2024 (down from $4.5B in 2023). This is a lifecycle removal — the restructuring program initiated in 2023 has wound down, and the charges are no longer material enough to warrant separate disclosure.
Removed from previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Dividend payments to stockholders of Class A, Class B, and Class C shares, which were first paid in June 2024, were $3.5 billion, $519 million, and $3.3 billion, respectively, totaling $7.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2024.
The current filing no longer highlights that dividends were "first paid in June 2024," as this was a one-time event in the baseline period. The current filing simply reports 2025 dividend payments ($4.8B for Class A, $703M for Class B, $4.5B for Class C) without the "first paid" language. This is a lifecycle removal of announcement-style language.
Removed from previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
In September 2024, the European Court of Justice rejected our appeal of the 2017 decision and upheld the €2.4 billion fine. In the third quarter of 2024, we made a cash payment of $3.0 billion for the 2017 shopping fine.
The current filing no longer separately highlights the $3.0B cash payment made in Q3 2024 for the 2017 EC shopping fine, as this was a discrete event in the prior period. The current filing focuses on the new $3.5B EC fine accrued in Q3 2025. This is a lifecycle removal of a completed payment event.
Notes
~26,100 words (+5% vs prior)FY2025 notes reflect major debt issuance ($64B), pending Wiz/Intersect acquisitions ($37B), new credit derivatives, and $32B post-period equity gain.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
In March 2025, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Wiz, a leading cloud security platform, for $32.0 billion, subject to closing adjustments, in an all-cash transaction. The acquisition of Wiz is expected to close in 2026, subject to customary closing conditions, including the receipt of regulatory approvals. Upon the close of the acquisition, Wiz will be part of the Google Cloud segment.
Alphabet announced a $32 billion all-cash acquisition of Wiz, a cloud security platform, expected to close in 2026 pending regulatory approval. This is the largest disclosed pending acquisition and will be integrated into Google Cloud. The baseline filing contained no reference to this transaction.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
In December 2025, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Intersect, which provides data center and energy infrastructure solutions, for $4.8 billion in cash, plus the assumption of debt. The acquisition of Intersect is expected to close in the first half of 2026, subject to customary closing conditions.
Alphabet announced a $4.8 billion cash acquisition of Intersect, a data center and energy infrastructure provider, expected to close in H1 2026. This reflects strategic investment in infrastructure capacity. The baseline filing contained no reference to this transaction.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
During 2025, we issued $22.5 billion of US dollar-denominated senior unsecured notes and €13.25 billion of euro-denominated senior unsecured notes for general corporate purposes.
Alphabet issued approximately $38 billion equivalent in new senior unsecured notes during 2025 (USD and EUR tranches), significantly expanding the debt capital structure. The baseline showed $12 billion face value of long-term debt; the current filing shows $49 billion, reflecting this new issuance.
Previous filing · view on EDGAR →
Total face value of long-term debt 13,000 12,000
Current filing · view on EDGAR →
Total face value of long-term debt 12,000 49,085
Long-term debt face value increased from $12 billion (Dec 2024) to $49 billion (Dec 2025), driven by the 2025 debt issuances described above. This quadrupling of debt reflects funding for capital expenditures and general corporate purposes.
Added in current filing · view on EDGAR →
Credit derivatives(1) $0 $16,940 (1) Notional amounts for credit derivatives are the backstop obligations related to certain third-party data center leases and represent the maximum potential amount of future payments that could be required in the event of certain default scenarios over remaining agreement periods of up to 15 years. In the event we are required to make payments under certain backstop obligations, we may receive equity in or cash payments from certain counterparties, the amounts for which are not reflected in the notional amounts for credit derivatives.
Alphabet entered into credit derivative backstop agreements with $16.9 billion notional value related to third-party data center leases, representing contingent obligations over up to 15 years. These are new off-balance-sheet exposures not present in the baseline. The company may receive equity or cash if backstops are triggered.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
We provide financial guarantees to certain counterparties, in the form of backstop agreements with varying terms through August 2026. These backstop agreements support counterparty procurement of long-lead time equipment for our future power purchase agreements. As of December 31, 2025, our maximum potential amount of future payments under these guarantees was $5.7 billion, upon which we may receive certain assets. The fair value of these obligations was not material.
Alphabet provided $5.7 billion in financial guarantees to support counterparty procurement of equipment for future power purchase agreements, with terms through August 2026. These are new contingent liabilities not disclosed in the baseline, reflecting infrastructure buildout commitments.
Previous filing · view on EDGAR →
Total non-marketable securities
$31,008 $37,982
Current filing · view on EDGAR →
Total non-marketable securities $37,982 $68,687
Non-marketable securities increased from $38 billion (Dec 2024) to $69 billion (Dec 2025), driven by $22.7 billion in upward fair value adjustments during 2025. This reflects mark-to-market gains on private company investments, including the $32 billion post-period gain disclosed in Note 16.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
In January 2026, we recognized approximately $32.0 billion of unrealized gains in our non-marketable investments. These unrealized gains reflect an estimated increase in the fair value measurement following observable transactions that occurred in January 2026, and are subject to change as we finalize related valuations.
Alphabet recognized a $32 billion unrealized gain on non-marketable equity securities in January 2026, following observable transactions in a private company investment. This is a post-balance-sheet event that will be reflected in Q1 2026 results and represents a material increase in investment value.
Previous filing · view on EDGAR →
Purchases of property and equipment (31,485) (32,251) (52,535)
Current filing · view on EDGAR →
Purchases of property and equipment (32,251) (52,535) (91,447)
Capital expenditures on property and equipment increased from $52.5 billion in 2024 to $91.4 billion in 2025, a 74% year-over-year increase. This reflects accelerated investment in technical infrastructure, primarily data centers and AI compute capacity.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
As of December 31, 2024, we had $93.2 billion of remaining performance obligations (“revenue backlog”), primarily related to Google Cloud.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
As of December 31, 2025, we had $242.8 billion of remaining performance obligations (“revenue backlog"), primarily related to Google Cloud.
Revenue backlog increased from $93 billion (Dec 2024) to $243 billion (Dec 2025), a 160% increase, driven by Google Cloud contract commitments. Just over 50% is expected to be recognized over the next 24 months, indicating strong forward visibility for Cloud revenue.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
In February 2026, Waymo, a consolidated VIE, announced an investment round of $16.0 billion, the significant majority of which was funded by Alphabet. Investments from external parties will be accounted for as equity transactions and will result in recognition of noncontrolling interests.
Waymo raised $16 billion in February 2026, with the majority funded by Alphabet. External party investments will create noncontrolling interests. This is a post-period event reflecting continued capital commitment to autonomous driving, following the $5.6 billion funding disclosed in the baseline for 2024.
Added in current filing · view on EDGAR →
In September 2025, the EC announced its decision that Google had infringed European competition laws through "self-preferencing" practices on the buy-side and the sell-side relating to Google's advertising technology business. The EC decision imposed a €3.0 billion fine and directed Google to cease and desist the alleged "self-preferencing" practices. We appealed the ruling in November 2025. We recognized a charge of $3.5 billion in the third quarter of 2025, and we placed bank guarantees in the fourth quarter of 2025 in lieu of cash payment.
The EC imposed a €3 billion fine in September 2025 for alleged self-preferencing in advertising technology, which Alphabet appealed. A $3.5 billion charge was recognized in Q3 2025, and bank guarantees were placed in Q4 2025 instead of cash payment. This is a new regulatory penalty not present in the baseline.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
In October 2020, the DOJ and a number of state Attorneys General filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia alleging that Google violated U.S. antitrust laws relating to Search and Search advertising. In August 2024, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that Google violated such U.S. antitrust laws. A separate proceeding is being held to determine remedies, the range of which vary widely. The DOJ has proposed a high level remedy framework, which includes alterations to our products and services and our business models and operations, including structural remedies, and/or our distribution arrangements, among other changes, some of which could have a material adverse effect on our business. We have filed our own remedies proposal ahead of a hearing on remedies in April 2025. We expect a decision likely in the second half of 2025, after which we intend to appeal.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
In October 2020, the DOJ and a number of state Attorneys General filed a lawsuit in the US District Court for the District of Columbia concerning Google's Search and Search advertising practices and its compliance with US antitrust laws. In August 2024, the US District Court for the District of Columbia ruled against Google. A final judgment was entered in December 2025, which, among other things, imposes restrictions on how Google distributes its services and requires Google to share certain search data with and offer syndication services to certain competitors. In January 2026, we appealed the final judgment and moved to pause implementation of certain remedies. In February 2026, the DOJ and state Attorneys General also appealed.
The DOJ Search antitrust case progressed from pending remedies (baseline) to a final judgment entered in December 2025, imposing restrictions on distribution and requiring data sharing with competitors. Both parties appealed in early 2026. The remedies are now concrete rather than proposed, representing a material adverse development.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
In December 2020, a number of state Attorneys General filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging that Google violated U.S. antitrust laws as well as state deceptive trade laws relating to its advertising technology, and a trial is scheduled for March 2025. Additionally, in January 2023, the DOJ, along with a number of state Attorneys General, filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia alleging that Google violated U.S. antitrust laws relating to its advertising technology, and a number of additional state Attorneys General subsequently joined the lawsuit. The trial ended in September 2024, and we expect a decision in early 2025.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
In December 2020, a number of state Attorneys General filed a lawsuit in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas concerning Google's advertising technology and its compliance with US antitrust laws and state deceptive trade laws. In January 2023, the DOJ, along with a number of state Attorneys General, filed a lawsuit in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia concerning Google's advertising technology and its compliance with US antitrust laws, and a number of additional state Attorneys General subsequently joined the lawsuit. In April 2025, the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia issued a mixed decision in the DOJ case against Google, ruling that neither Google's advertiser tools nor the DoubleClick and AdMeld acquisitions were anticompetitive, but that Google's publisher tools unfairly excluded rivals. A separate proceeding to determine remedies, the range of which vary widely, took place in September 2025, with the parties presenting differing remedy proposals. The DOJ's remedy proposal includes structural remedies that could have a material adverse effect on our business. Closing arguments were held in November 2025, and we are awaiting a final judgment. After that judgment, we plan to appeal the adverse portion of the April 2025 decision and potentially aspects of the remedies decision.
The DOJ advertising technology case progressed from awaiting decision (baseline) to a mixed April 2025 ruling: advertiser tools and acquisitions cleared, but publisher tools found anticompetitive. Remedies proceedings occurred in September 2025, with DOJ proposing structural remedies. Final judgment is pending, with appeal planned. This represents partial adverse outcome with material remedy risk.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
In December 2023, a California jury delivered a verdict in Epic Games v. Google finding that Google violated U.S. antitrust laws related to Google Play's business. Epic did not seek monetary damages. The presiding judge issued a remedies decision in October 2024, ordering a variety of alterations to our business models and operations and contractual agreements for Android and Google Play. We are appealing the verdict and the trial court judge temporarily paused the implementation of the remedies while the Court of Appeals considers our request to pause implementation of the remedies pending the duration of the appeal.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
In October 2025, we reached a settlement with Epic to modify the remedies in this case and resolve certain other lawsuits Epic has filed regarding Google Play's business. The settlement is contingent on the court approving a proposed modified injunction. Epic and Google filed a joint motion to modify the injunction in November 2025, which is currently pending before the court.
Alphabet reached a settlement with Epic in October 2025 to modify remedies and resolve related lawsuits, pending court approval. The baseline showed active appeal with temporary pause; the current filing shows negotiated settlement, reducing litigation risk and potentially limiting remedy scope.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
In October 2025, we finalized a $1.4 billion settlement of certain privacy matters.
Alphabet finalized a $1.4 billion settlement of privacy matters in October 2025. This is a new disclosed settlement not present in the baseline, reflecting resolution of privacy investigations and litigation.
Previous filing · view on EDGAR →
In June 2022, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission and in October 2023, the Japanese Fair Trade Commission each opened an investigation into Search distribution practices.
Current filing · view on EDGAR →
In June 2022, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) opened an investigation into Search distribution practices. In August 2025, we agreed to a settlement with the ACCC requiring, among other things, changes to our Android agreements. We recognized a charge in the second quarter of 2025, and the settlement was approved by the court in December 2025.
The ACCC investigation progressed from open inquiry (baseline) to a settlement in August 2025 requiring changes to Android agreements, with court approval in December 2025. A charge was recognized in Q2 2025. This represents resolution of the Australian regulatory matter.
Previous filing · view on EDGAR →
In June 2022, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission and in October 2023, the Japanese Fair Trade Commission each opened an investigation into Search distribution practices.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
In October 2023, the Japanese Fair Trade Commission (JFTC) opened an investigation into Search distribution practices. In April 2025, the JFTC issued a cease-and-desist order requiring us to make changes to our Android agreements to ensure they are consistent with Japanese antitrust law. The JFTC did not impose monetary penalties.
The JFTC investigation progressed from open inquiry (baseline) to a cease-and-desist order in April 2025 requiring changes to Android agreements, without monetary penalties. This represents resolution of the Japanese regulatory matter with operational impact but no fine.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
In January 2026, we executed a power purchase agreement which we expect to be accounted for as a lease resulting in future payments depending on certain agreement terms of $9.9 billion between 2027 and 2047. If certain contractual conditions for the project are not met, we would instead make a one-time payment of approximately $3.5 billion and assume ownership of the power generating assets.
Alphabet executed a power purchase agreement in January 2026 that will be accounted for as a lease, with $9.9 billion in future payments over 20 years (2027-2047). If project conditions are not met, Alphabet would pay $3.5 billion and take ownership of the power assets. This is a new long-term energy infrastructure commitment.
Previous filing · view on EDGAR →
European Commission fines(1)
$9,525 $6,322
Current filing · view on EDGAR →
Accrued fines and settlements(1) $9,830 $15,594
Accrued fines and settlements increased from $6.3 billion (Dec 2024, labeled EC fines) to $15.6 billion (Dec 2025, relabeled to include broader fines/settlements). The increase reflects new regulatory penalties including the EC advertising technology fine and other settlements.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Dividends and dividend equivalents declared ($0.60 per share)
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Dividends and dividend equivalents declared ($0.83 per share)
Quarterly dividend increased from $0.60 per share (2024) to $0.83 per share (2025), a 38% increase. The current filing notes the Board increased the quarterly dividend by 5% in April 2025 to $0.21 per share, implying four quarterly payments in 2025.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
We had no foreign currency-denominated debt as of December 31, 2024 and $15.4 billion carrying value of foreign currency-denominated debt designated as net investment hedges as of December 31, 2025.
Alphabet designated $15.4 billion of foreign currency-denominated debt as net investment hedges as of December 31, 2025, a new hedging strategy not present in the baseline. This reflects use of euro-denominated debt issuances to hedge foreign subsidiary investments.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Includes $500 million of floating-rate notes due in 2028. Interest is calculated using the compounded Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) plus 0.52%, reset quarterly.
Alphabet issued $500 million of floating-rate notes in 2025, a new debt instrument type not present in the baseline. Interest is SOFR-based, resetting quarterly, introducing interest rate exposure to the debt portfolio.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Changes to US tax law enacted on July 4, 2025, allow for immediate expensing of domestic research and experimentation costs, accelerated depreciation on eligible capital expenditures, and other tax law changes impacting 2025 with certain changes effective in 2026. These changes are reflected in our results for the year ended December 31, 2025.
US tax law changes enacted July 4, 2025 allow immediate expensing of domestic R&D costs and accelerated depreciation on capex, effective for 2025 with some changes in 2026. This is a favorable tax development reducing the capitalized R&D burden and improving cash tax position.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06 "Intangibles: Goodwill and Other‒Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software" to modernize the accounting for software costs under Subtopic 350-40, Intangibles‒Goodwill and Other‒Internal-Use Software (referred to as “internal-use software”). Upon adoption, we will be required to account for internal-use software under the updated capitalization criteria. The standard is effective for our interim and annual 2028 periods, with early adoption permitted. The standard can be applied either prospectively, retrospectively, or under a modified transition approach. We are currently assessing adoption timing, the method of adoption, and the effect that the updated standard will have on our consolidated financial statements.
A new accounting standard (ASU 2025-06) was issued in September 2025 that will change internal-use software capitalization criteria, effective 2028 with early adoption permitted. Alphabet is assessing the impact. This could affect how software development costs are capitalized versus expensed.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2023-09 "Income Taxes (Topics 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures" to expand the disclosure requirements for income taxes. Upon adoption we will be required to disclose additional specified categories in the rate reconciliation in both percentage and dollar amounts. We will also be required to disclose the amount of income taxes paid disaggregated by jurisdiction, among other disclosure requirements. The standard can be applied either prospectively or retrospectively. We will adopt the standard in our 2025 annual period and are currently assessing the effect that the updated standard will have on our financial statement disclosures.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09 "Income Taxes (Topics 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures" which expands the disclosure requirements for income taxes. We adopted this ASU for our 2025 annual period with the comparative periods updated to reflect additional disclosures. See Note 14 for the revised disclosures consistent with the new standard.
Alphabet adopted ASU 2023-09 in 2025, expanding income tax disclosures including rate reconciliation detail and cash taxes paid by jurisdiction. The baseline showed pending adoption; the current filing shows adoption complete with enhanced Note 14 disclosures.
Risk Factors
~17,000 words (+2% vs prior)New AI regulation details, expanded litigation updates including final Search remedies judgment, refined supply chain and infrastructure risks.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
We generated more than 75% of total revenues from online advertising in 2024.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
We generated more than 70% of total revenues from online advertising in 2025.
Advertising's share of total revenue declined from more than 75% in 2024 to more than 70% in 2025, reflecting a shift in revenue mix toward other business lines such as Google Cloud and consumer subscriptions. This trend continues the company's diversification away from advertising dependence.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Changes to our advertising policies and data privacy practices, such as our initiatives related to third-party cookies, including our announcement in July 2024 to move from phasing out all third-party cookies to a proposed user choice model (which remains subject to continuing discussions with regulators), as well as changes to other companies’ advertising and/or data privacy practices have in the past, and may in the future, affect the advertising services that we are able to provide.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
We believe AI is quickly reshaping the advertising industry, including how ads are delivered online, and we and our competitors are constantly adjusting to meet this shift and provide new and evolving advertising formats. There is no assurance that we will adapt effectively and competitively to meet this shift, and that such advertising formats, strategies, and offerings will be successful.
The company now frames AI as the primary force reshaping advertising delivery and formats, replacing the prior focus on third-party cookie policy changes. This signals a strategic pivot: AI-driven ad innovation is now the central competitive challenge, with explicit acknowledgment that success is not assured.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
To meet the compute capacity demands of AI training and inference, as well as traditional cloud computing services, we are entering into significant leasing arrangements with third party operators, which may increase costs and operational complexity. We also have a number of large, long-duration commercial agreements, which could increase our liabilities and obligations in the event of nonperformance by us, our counterparties, or vendors. In such nonperformance or an industry downturn, we may incur additional liabilities, have excess capacity that we cannot easily redeploy, and not receive payments from our counterparties or customers.
New disclosure of significant third-party leasing arrangements and large commercial agreements to support AI compute capacity. The company explicitly flags risks of nonperformance, excess capacity, and payment defaults—indicating material capital commitments and contingent liabilities tied to AI infrastructure scaling.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
We have invested significantly and expect to continue to invest significantly in our property and equipment, including our technical infrastructure, and we expect these assets to benefit our business over their estimated useful lives. Changes in facts and circumstances such as changes to ongoing business operations, changes in the planned use and utilization of assets, and/or technological advancements, could indicate a change in the period over which we expect to benefit from the asset and impact our financial condition and operating results.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
We have invested and expect to significantly expand our investment in property and equipment, including our technical infrastructure, and we expect these assets to benefit our business over their estimated useful lives. Changes in facts and circumstances such as changes to historical asset performance, expected technology advancements, and future network deployment plans could change the period over which we expect to benefit from the asset and impact our financial condition and operating results.
The current filing adds "historical asset performance" and "future network deployment plans" as factors that could trigger useful-life reassessments, alongside the prior factors. This broadens the circumstances under which accelerated depreciation or impairment could occur, particularly relevant given rapid AI infrastructure buildout.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
We are incurring costs to build and maintain infrastructure to support cloud computing services, invest in cybersecurity, and hire talent, particularly to support and scale our sales force.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
We are incurring significant and increasing costs and new liabilities, including contingent liabilities, to build and maintain infrastructure to support cloud computing services, invest in cybersecurity, and hire talent.
The company now describes Cloud infrastructure costs as "significant and increasing" and explicitly adds "new liabilities, including contingent liabilities." This is a stronger warning than the prior generic "incurring costs" language, suggesting material off-balance-sheet or conditional obligations tied to Cloud expansion.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Our ability to scale our technical infrastructure is increasingly constrained by the availability of power, water, and land. For example, energy supply is constrained globally due to the significant increase in demand for and limited availability of energy to power AI compute. Securing this capacity involves entering into complex, long-lead-time arrangements. Additionally, manufacturing and supply of servers and network equipment for our technical infrastructure, particularly for specialized AI chips, is limited to a small number of qualified suppliers. Extended or unforeseen disruptions at these suppliers could impact our ability to meet customer demand. Failure to secure sufficient capacity in a timely manner would limit our ability to train models and serve Cloud customers.
New disclosure that power, water, and land availability are now material constraints on infrastructure scaling, with specific focus on global energy shortages for AI compute. The company also flags concentrated supplier risk for AI chips and warns that capacity shortfalls would directly limit model training and Cloud service delivery—a direct revenue and competitive risk.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
For example, industry supply capacity for AI accelerators, including Graphics Processing Units, or GPUs, as well as our custom-built TPUs, is highly competitive and rapidly evolving. If we are unable to negotiate favorable contractual terms or our competitors claim the supply or capacity first, we may face supply constraints.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
For example, industry supply capacity for AI accelerators, including GPUs as well as our custom-built TPUs, is highly competitive and rapidly evolving. If we are unable to negotiate favorable contractual terms or our competitors claim the supply or capacity first, we may face increased costs and supply constraints, which could harm our business, financial condition, and operating results.
The current filing adds "increased costs" alongside supply constraints as a consequence of losing the AI accelerator supply race. This acknowledges that even if the company secures capacity, it may pay a premium—a margin pressure risk not previously disclosed.
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
For example, the DOJ and a number of state Attorneys General filed a lawsuit concerning our Search and Search advertising practices and our compliance with US antitrust laws. In August 2024, the US District Court for the District of Columbia ruled against Google, and in December 2025, entered a final judgment requiring remedies, which, among other things, imposes restrictions on how we distribute our services and requires us to share certain search data with and offer syndication services to certain competitors. In January 2026, we appealed the final judgment and moved to pause implementation of certain remedies. In February 2026, the DOJ and state Attorneys General also appealed.
The Search antitrust case has moved from pending remedies to a final judgment entered in December 2025. The company now discloses specific remedies: restrictions on service distribution, mandatory data sharing with competitors, and required syndication services. Both sides have appealed, and the company has moved to pause certain remedies. This is a material development—remedies are now defined and enforceable, pending appeal.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
In January 2023, the DOJ and several Attorneys General sued in the Eastern District of Virginia alleging similar antitrust violations relating to Google’s advertising technology. Trial in the DOJ matter concluded in September 2024 with a decision expected in early 2025. If we are unsuccessful, we could face an order on remedies that could harm our business, reputation, financial condition, and operating results.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
In January 2023, the DOJ and a number of state Attorneys General sued in the Eastern District of Virginia alleging similar antitrust violations relating to our advertising technology. In April 2025, the presiding judge issued a mixed decision in the DOJ case against us, ruling that neither our advertiser tools nor the DoubleClick and AdMeld acquisitions were anticompetitive, but that our publisher tools unfairly excluded rivals. A separate proceeding to determine remedies, the range of which varies widely, took place in September 2025 with the parties presenting differing remedy proposals. The DOJ's remedy proposal includes structural remedies that could harm our business. Closing arguments were held in November 2025, and we are awaiting a final judgment. After that judgment, we plan to appeal the adverse portion of the April 2025 decision and potentially aspects of the remedies decision.
The ad tech antitrust case has progressed significantly: a mixed April 2025 decision found publisher tools anticompetitive (but cleared advertiser tools and prior acquisitions), a remedies proceeding occurred in September 2025 with the DOJ proposing structural remedies, and closing arguments were held in November 2025. The company is awaiting a final judgment and plans to appeal. This is a material update—liability is partially established, structural remedies are on the table, and the timeline has advanced.
Removed from previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Also, in December 2023, a California jury delivered a verdict in Epic Games v. Google finding that Google violated antitrust laws relating to Google Play's business. The presiding judge issued a remedies decision in October 2024 that ordered a variety of alterations to our business models and operations and contractual agreements for Android and Google Play. We are appealing the verdict, but if we are unsuccessful, we could face significant expenses to implement the remedies, and such costs and alterations could harm our business, reputation, financial condition, and operating results.
The Epic Games antitrust case, which resulted in an October 2024 remedies order requiring alterations to Google Play's business model, is no longer mentioned in the current filing. The company is appealing, but the removal suggests either a strategic de-emphasis or a belief that the appeal or implementation timeline has reduced near-term materiality. Investors should monitor whether the appeal succeeds or remedies are implemented.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
AI: Laws and regulations focused on the development, use, and provision of AI technologies and other digital products and services, which could result in monetary penalties or other regulatory actions. For example, the EU AI Act came into force on August 1, 2024, and will generally become fully applicable after a two-year transitional period (although certain obligations will take effect at an earlier or later time). The EU AI Act introduces various requirements for AI systems and models placed on the market or put into service in the EU, including specific transparency and other requirements for general purpose AI systems and the models on which those systems are based. In the U.S., there is increasing uncertainty as to the federal government's approach to AI regulation going forward, as the continued applicability of the White House's 2023 Executive Order on the Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence, which lays out a framework for the U.S. government, among other things, to monitor private sector development of certain foundation models, remains subject to regulatory development. Several states are considering enacting or have already enacted regulations concerning the use of AI technologies, including those focused on consumer protection, and depending on the scope of AI regulation at the federal level, some states may move to regulate AI model development and deployment. Further, at the federal and state level, there have been various proposals (and in some cases laws enacted) addressing “deepfakes” and other AI-generated synthetic media.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
AI: Laws and regulations focused on the development, use, and provision of AI technologies and other digital products and services, which could result in monetary penalties or other regulatory actions. For example, the EU AI Act came into force on August 1, 2024, and will generally become fully applicable after a two-year transitional period (although certain obligations have already taken effect). The EU AI Act introduces various requirements for AI systems and models placed on the market in the EU, including specific transparency, safety, and copyright requirements for general purpose AI systems and the models on which those systems are based. Various countries, including Brazil, India, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, and Vietnam, have also enacted or are considering enacting regulations focused on AI. In the US, an increasing amount of legislative and regulatory activity regarding AI is taking place at the state level. In 2025, state legislatures considered more than 1,000 AI-related bills, including on fundamental model research and development, synthetic media, algorithmic decision-making, and many others, and took a variety of approaches to AI regulation. For instance, in 2025, California and New York passed the Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act and the Responsible AI Safety and Education Act, respectively, each of which imposes safety and reporting obligations on developers of frontier models. At the same time, the White House's Executive Order, Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence, prioritizes deregulation, while its AI Action Plan emphasizes accelerating American innovation leadership.
The US AI regulatory landscape has shifted materially. The prior filing described federal uncertainty around the 2023 Executive Order; the current filing reports a new White House Executive Order prioritizing deregulation and innovation leadership. At the state level, the company now reports over 1,000 AI bills considered in 2025, with California and New York passing frontier-model safety laws. The EU AI Act language is also refined to specify "transparency, safety, and copyright requirements." This reflects a more concrete, fragmented regulatory environment with both deregulatory federal signals and aggressive state-level rulemaking.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Content moderation: Various laws covering content moderation and removal, and related disclosure obligations, such as the EU's Digital Services Act, Florida’s Senate Bill 7072 and Texas’ House Bill 20, and laws and proposed legislation in Singapore, Australia, and the United Kingdom that impose penalties for failure to remove certain types of content or require disclosure of information about the operation of our services and algorithms, which may make it harder for services like Google Search and YouTube to detect and deal with low-quality, deceptive, or harmful content, or on the other hand, may impinge on the rights of free expression, which, in turn, could impact how our platforms are viewed by users. Additionally, legislators are increasingly focused on regulating online child safety, including content protections for minors under eighteen years of age. These regulations could result in our having to modify our products and services and incur additional costs to operate and monitor minors’ experiences on our products and services.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Content moderation: Various laws covering content moderation and removal, and related disclosure obligations, such as the EU's Digital Services Act, Florida's Senate Bill 7072 and Texas' House Bill 20, and laws and proposed legislation in Singapore, Australia, and the United Kingdom (UK) that impose penalties for failure to remove certain types of content or require disclosure of information about the operation of our services and algorithms, which may make it harder for services like Google Search and YouTube to detect and limit low-quality, deceptive, or harmful content, or, on the other hand, may impinge on the rights of free expression and access to content. Additionally, new regulations apply to online child safety, including access and content restrictions as well as other limitations for minors, which may also conflict with rights of free expression and access to information. These regulations could result in our having to modify our products and services and monitor minors' experiences on our products and services.
The current filing strengthens the framing of content moderation laws as potentially impairing the company's ability to "detect and limit" harmful content (vs. prior "detect and deal with"), and adds that minor-protection regulations may "conflict with rights of free expression and access to information." The prior mention of "incur additional costs" is removed. This suggests the company is emphasizing the operational and free-speech tensions of these laws, rather than just compliance costs.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
International revenues accounted for approximately 51% of our consolidated revenues in 2024.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
International revenues accounted for approximately 52% of consolidated revenues in 2025.
International revenue share increased from approximately 51% in 2024 to approximately 52% in 2025, continuing the trend of geographic diversification and exposure to foreign regulatory and currency risks.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
sanctions, import and export controls, other market access barriers, political unrest, geopolitical tensions, changes in regimes, or armed conflict (such as ongoing conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine), any of which may affect our business continuity, increase our operating costs, limit demand for our products and services, limit our ability to source components or final products, or prevent or impede us from operating in certain jurisdictions, complying with local laws, or offering products or services;
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
sanctions, tariffs, import and export controls, other market access barriers, political unrest, geopolitical tensions, changes in regimes, or armed conflict (such as ongoing conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine), any of which may affect our business continuity, increase our operating costs, limit demand for our products and services, limit our ability to source components or final products, or prevent or impede us from operating in certain jurisdictions, complying with local laws, or offering products or services;
The company now explicitly lists "tariffs" alongside sanctions and export controls as a risk to international operations. This addition likely reflects heightened trade-policy uncertainty and potential cost impacts from tariff regimes.
Added in current filing · view on EDGAR →
Disruptions in our ability to access future financing or manage our indebtedness could adversely affect our ability to execute our strategy and harm our financial condition. We may from time to time access capital markets for debt or seek to enter into other forms of financing, such as leases. Any difficulty in accessing capital markets, entering into other forms of financing on favorable terms, or managing our existing indebtedness could increase our costs of financing and restrict our ability to invest in our business. Furthermore, the combination of our current and any future indebtedness, including obligations arising under leases, backstops, guarantees, and potential liabilities from large commercial agreements, could harm our financial condition and reduce our financial and business flexibility.
New standalone risk factor on financing and indebtedness. The company flags potential difficulty accessing capital markets or managing debt, and explicitly includes leases, backstops, guarantees, and large commercial agreements as sources of financial obligation. This is a new disclosure, likely reflecting the scale of AI infrastructure commitments and the need to preserve financial flexibility.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
We measure certain of our non-marketable equity and debt securities, certain other instruments including stock-based compensation awards settled in the stock of Other Bet companies, and certain assets and liabilities acquired in a business combination, at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, which is inherently subjective and requires management judgment and estimation. All gains and losses on non-marketable equity securities are recognized in OI&E, which increases the volatility of our OI&E. The unrealized gains and losses or impairments we record from fair value remeasurements in any particular period may differ significantly from the gains and losses we ultimately realize on such investments.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
We measure certain of our non-marketable equity and debt securities, and certain other instruments including stock-based compensation (SBC) awards of Other Bet companies, at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, which is inherently subjective and requires management judgment and estimation. Gains and losses on non-marketable equity securities are recognized in other income (expense), net (OI&E), which increases the volatility of our OI&E. The unrealized gains and losses or impairments we record from fair value remeasurements in any particular period may differ significantly from the gains and losses we ultimately realize on such investments. Changes in fair value on SBC awards are recognized primarily through operating expenses.
The current filing clarifies that SBC awards (not just those settled in Other Bet stock) are measured at fair value, and that changes in SBC fair value are recognized primarily through operating expenses (not OI&E). This is a technical refinement that affects how investors should interpret operating expense volatility.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
We have experienced and/or may in the future experience supply shortages, price increases, quality issues, and/or longer lead times that could negatively affect our operations, driven by raw material and/or component availability, manufacturing capacity, labor shortages, industry allocations, logistics capacity, inflation, foreign currency exchange rates, tariffs, sanctions and export controls, trade disputes and barriers, forced labor concerns, sustainability sourcing requirements, geopolitical tensions, armed conflicts, natural disasters or pandemics, the effects of climate change (such as sea level rise, drought, flooding, heat waves, wildfires and resultant air quality effects and power shutdowns associated with wildfire prevention, and increased storm severity), power and transmission availability, and significant changes in the financial or business condition of our suppliers.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
We have experienced and may in the future experience supply shortages, price increases, quality issues, or longer lead times that could harm our operations, driven by raw material or component availability, manufacturing capacity, labor shortages, industry allocations, logistics capacity, inflation, foreign currency exchange rates, tariffs, sanctions and export controls, trade disputes and barriers, forced labor concerns, sourcing requirements, geopolitical tensions, armed conflicts, natural disasters or pandemics, the effects of climate change, power and transmission availability, and significant changes in the financial or business condition of our suppliers.
The current filing removes the detailed parenthetical examples of climate change effects (sea level rise, drought, flooding, wildfires, etc.) and replaces "sustainability sourcing requirements" with the broader "sourcing requirements." This is a simplification, not a material change in risk—climate change remains listed as a supply chain risk factor.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
We have also seen, and will continue to see, industry-wide software supply chain vulnerabilities, which could affect our or other parties’ systems.
Current filing · view on EDGAR →
We have also seen, and will continue to see, industry-wide software supply chain vulnerabilities and attacks on telecommunications and other critical infrastructure, which could affect our or other parties' systems.
The company now explicitly includes "attacks on telecommunications and other critical infrastructure" alongside software supply chain vulnerabilities. This broadens the cybersecurity threat landscape to include infrastructure-layer attacks, which could disrupt service availability.
Previous filing · view on EDGAR →
In addition, we face the risk of cyber attacks by nation-states and state-sponsored actors.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
In addition, we face the risk of cyber attacks and data exfiltration or compromise by nation-states and state-sponsored actors.
The current filing adds "data exfiltration or compromise" to the description of nation-state cyber threats. This is a more specific articulation of the risk—not just service disruption, but also data theft.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Increased use of AI in our offerings and internal systems may create new avenues of abuse for bad actors.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Increased use of AI in our offerings and internal systems may create new instances of problematic content and increased potential for misuse and abuse.
The current filing broadens the AI content risk from "new avenues of abuse for bad actors" to "new instances of problematic content and increased potential for misuse and abuse." This is a more comprehensive framing, acknowledging that AI may generate problematic content directly (not just enable bad actors).
Added in current filing · verify on EDGAR →
We face legal and regulatory challenges to our efforts to address low-quality content, and our ability to address it may be constrained or made more costly through added compliance requirements.
New disclosure that the company faces legal and regulatory challenges to its content-quality enforcement efforts, and that compliance requirements may constrain or increase the cost of addressing low-quality content. This reflects the tension between content moderation and free-speech or competition laws.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Our brands have been, and may in the future be, negatively affected by a number of factors, including, among others, reputational issues, third-party content shared on our platforms, data privacy and security issues and developments, and product or technical performance failures.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Our brands have been, and may in the future be, harmed by a number of factors, including, among others, reputational issues, third-party content shared on our platforms, data privacy and security issues and developments, issues in delivering age-appropriate experiences to minors, and product or technical performance failures.
The company now explicitly lists "issues in delivering age-appropriate experiences to minors" as a brand risk. This reflects heightened regulatory and public scrutiny of how platforms serve minors, particularly in light of new child-safety laws.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) is coordinating negotiations among more than 140 countries with the goal of achieving consensus around substantial changes to international tax policies, including the implementation of a minimum global effective tax rate of 15%, on which various jurisdictions around the world have either introduced draft legislation or adopted final legislation. Our effective tax rate and cash tax payments could increase as a result of these changes.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Over 140 countries are negotiating changes to international tax policies led by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), including a 15% global minimum tax rate. In January 2026, the OECD announced a "Side-by-Side Safe Harbor" that exempts US operations of US-parented companies from global minimum tax rules. Adoption of minimum tax rules outside the US could increase our effective tax rate and cash tax payments.
The company now reports that the OECD announced a "Side-by-Side Safe Harbor" in January 2026 that exempts US operations of US-parented companies from global minimum tax rules. This is a material development—it reduces the near-term tax risk for the company's US operations, though foreign operations remain exposed.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
As of December 31, 2024, Larry Page and Sergey Brin beneficially owned approximately 87.4% of our outstanding Class B stock, which represented approximately 52.1% of the voting power of our outstanding common stock.
Current filing · view on EDGAR →
As of December 31, 2025, Larry Page and Sergey Brin beneficially owned approximately 89.3% of our outstanding Class B stock, which represented approximately 52.7% of the voting power of our outstanding common stock.
Larry and Sergey's Class B ownership increased from 87.4% to 89.3%, and their voting power increased from 52.1% to 52.7%. This reflects continued concentration of voting control, likely due to share repurchases of Class A and Class C stock.
Removed from previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
The trading price for our Class A stock and non-voting Class C stock may continue to be volatile.
The trading price of our stock has at times experienced significant volatility and may continue to be volatile. In addition to the factors discussed in this report, the trading prices of our Class A stock and Class C stock have fluctuated, and may continue to fluctuate widely, in response to various factors, including, among others, the size or continuity of either our share repurchase or dividend programs, the activities of our peers and changes in broader economic and political conditions around the world. These broad market and industry factors could harm the market price of our Class A stock and our Class C stock, regardless of our actual operating performance.
The standalone stock price volatility risk factor is removed from the current filing. This is a lifecycle removal—stock price volatility is a generic risk for all public companies and does not reflect a change in the company's underlying business or operations. The risk remains implicit in other factors (e.g., share repurchase program, market conditions).
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
failure to obtain required approvals on a timely basis, if at all, from governmental authorities; conditions placed upon approval that could, among other things, delay or prevent us from completing a transaction, or otherwise restrict our ability to realize the expected financial or strategic goals of a transaction; or investigations or litigation by governmental authorities related to our acquisitions and other strategic arrangements;
Current filing · view on EDGAR →
failure to obtain required approvals on a timely basis, if at all, from governmental authorities, or conditions placed upon approval, either of which could, among other things, delay or prevent us from completing a transaction, result in the payment of fees or penalties to a counterparty, or otherwise restrict our ability to realize the expected financial or strategic goals of a transaction; or investigations or litigation by governmental authorities related to our acquisitions, investments, and other strategic arrangements;
The current filing adds "result in the payment of fees or penalties to a counterparty" as a consequence of regulatory approval delays or failures. This is a new financial risk—the company may incur breakup fees or penalties if deals fall through due to regulatory issues.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
failure to realize the value of investments and joint ventures due to a lack of liquidity;
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
failure to realize the value of investments and joint ventures due to a lack of liquidity or an inability to identify buyers or negotiate favorable terms for intended divestitures;
The company now explicitly flags the risk of being unable to identify buyers or negotiate favorable terms for divestitures. This suggests the company may be considering or facing challenges in exiting certain investments or business units.
Previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
Competition in our industry for qualified employees is intense, and certain of our competitors have directly targeted, and may continue to target, our employees.
Current filing · verify on EDGAR →
Competition in our industry for qualified employees, particularly AI talent, is intense, and certain of our competitors have directly targeted, and may continue to target, our employees.
The company now explicitly calls out "particularly AI talent" as a focus of intense competition. This reflects the strategic importance of AI expertise and the risk of losing key personnel to competitors.
Removed from previous filing · verify on EDGAR →
In addition, we believe that our corporate culture fosters innovation, creativity, and teamwork. As our organization grows and evolves, we may need to adapt our corporate culture and work environments to ever-changing circumstances, such as during times of a natural disaster or pandemic, and these changes could affect our ability to compete effectively or have an adverse effect on our corporate culture. Under our hybrid work models, we may experience increased costs and/or disruption, in addition to potential effects on our ability to operate effectively and maintain our corporate culture.
The current filing removes the specific mention of "hybrid work models" and associated costs/disruption risks. This is a lifecycle removal—hybrid work is now the normalized operating model, and the company no longer views it as a discrete risk factor. The broader corporate culture risk remains.
Generated by AI · Jun 13, 2026 3:44 PM